BACKGROUND:Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common issue in intensive care units and is a potentially lethal consequence of severe burns. In severely burned patients with non-renal indications, renal replacement treatment is frequently used. This study’s aim was to compile a 10-year summary of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) experience at a single burn center, including patient outcomes, effectiveness, and potential complications in the context of severe burns. MATERIAL AND METHODS:This retrospective analysis included the clinical data from 723 burned patients. The data analysis of 300 patients with CRRT therapy included clinical data, laboratory tests, and CRRT parameters. The study group was split into 2 subgroups regarding onset of CRRT: early (up to 7 days after the trauma) and late. RESULTS:Age, burn extent, length of stay, and inhalation injury all had an impact on survival. Early CRRT was linked to a greater probability of death (P<0.005). Upon admission to the burn center, patients with early CRRT exhibited a bigger burn area, higher Baux and SOFA scores, and were younger (P<0.05). Sepsis was diagnosed more frequently in the late CRRT group. CONCLUSIONS:Our findings show that patients who require CRRT within the first 7 days following a burn injury have a poorer prognosis; however, this is not due to CRRT’s effect, but rather to the trauma’s severity. Future studies should explore long-term patient outcomes of CRRT among burn patients.

Katastrofy oparzeniowe i zdarzenia masowe są potencjalnymi scenariuszami, wymagającymi stworzenia odrębnych planów reagowania.

Background: Children make up a large percentage of those affected by burns worldwide, with most of them suffering from severe injuries that necessitate skilled medical attention. Despite medical progress, there is still no ideal dressing for the treatment of burn wounds in children. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of epidermal substitutes in the treatment of burn wounds in children. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluates the use of three dressings in the treatment of pediatric burns at a major Polish burn center. A patient database was used to identify children who received treatment with silver dressings, paraffin dressings or epidermal substitutes from 2009 to 2023. A demographic analysis was performed to collect the following information: causes of burns, procedural details and patient outcomes. Results: There were 439 patients aged between 1 month and 18 years. For severe burns, the number of interventions was lowest among children with epidermal substitute application (p = 0.039). Paraffin gauze resulted in the greatest number of skin grafts, whereas alloplastic replacement produced the least amount of transplantation (p < 0.005) regardless of the severity of the burn. Conclusions: Epidermal substitutes offer a good dressing option for burn wounds to improve their treatment and reduce the need for skin graft coverage. In the future, extended comparative or randomized trials are needed to confirm our results.

Background: Burns in children represent a significant public health issue, as there is no single targeted dressing for the treatment of burn wounds in children. The alloplastic epidermal skin substitute is the dressing of choice for treating burns in children in our burn center. However, it sometimes occurs that the dressing separates from the wound too early, before the process of full re-epithelialization. The inflammatory phase of wound healing seems to be crucial for maintaining the adhesion of the dressing, and thus, changes in parameters such as leukocyte levels and protein changes are of clinical significance. The aim of our study is to find laboratory factors that could contribute to premature dressing separation. Methods: The documentation of 182 children treated for acute burns at a major Polish burn center in the years 2009–2023 was analyzed. A demographic analysis was performed to collect information. The group was split into the following two categories based on the condition of the dressing: “attached to the wound” and “detached from the wound”. Laboratory tests were collected on admission and with control tests 3–5 days after injury. Results: The results indicate that only a few of the parameters studied showed a statistically significant difference between the groups of patients in whom the dressing did or did not attach. The most pronounced relationship was found for the pre-treatment leukocyte level (leuk1). Statistical significance was also demonstrated for hemoglobin levels and changes in protein (protein_diff) and also glucose levels (glucose_diff). Conclusions: Our study shows that there are blood parameters (leukocyte, protein, and glucose levels) that influence the adhesion of the dressing. Unfortunately, there are no other studies on this topic in the literature, so it seems very important to expand research in this direction.