Guoji Xu

Guoji Xu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2018 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FFFenghong Fan
Fenghong Fan
ZLZhen Liu
Zhen Liu
GXGuoji Xu
Guoji Xu
HPHui Peng
Hui Peng
CCC.S. Cai
C.S. Cai

1 March 2022 in Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJinsheng Wang
Jinsheng Wang
GXGuoji Xu
Guoji Xu
YLYongle Li
Yongle Li
AKAhsan Kareem
Ahsan Kareem

1 October 2021 in International Journal of Impact Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WWWenzheng Wan
Wenzheng Wan
JYJian Yang
Jian Yang
GXGuoji Xu
Guoji Xu
YLYikang Liu
Yikang Liu

1 October 2015 in Engineering Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GXGuoji Xu
Guoji Xu
CCC.S. Cai
C.S. Cai

1 December 2021 in Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJinsheng Wang
Jinsheng Wang
CLChenfeng Li
Chenfeng Li
GXGuoji Xu
Guoji Xu
YLYongle Li
Yongle Li
Ahsan KareemAhsan Kareem
Ahsan Kareem

23 March 2016 in Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GXGuoji Xu
Guoji Xu
CCChunsheng Cai
Chunsheng Cai
LDLu Deng
Lu Deng
In this study, a numerical method for predicting solitary wave forces on a typical coastal bridge deck with girders is utilised in order to obtain an alternative way to assess solitary wave forces on coastal bridge decks with sufficient accuracy. Firstly, a wave model based on the solitary wave theory representing the incident wave of tsunamis is applied through a computational fluid dynamics computer program, where the shear stress transport k-ω model is adopted as the turbulent closure for the Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes model equations. Then, the numerical wave profiles and the predicted wave forces are compared with the analytical solutions and the reported laboratory measurements, respectively. These verifications assure the results in the following parametric study reliable. Finally, comparisons between the numerical results and those acquired through the empirical methods are conducted in order to examine the appropriateness of these empirical procedures regarding this specific case. Furthermore, an expanded formula is proposed with the definitions of the key parameters being discussed thereafter. This method can be expanded to cases where different deck cross sections rather than the typical one used in the present study are considered and to scenarios where different wave parameters are involved. It is hoped that the expanded formula could provide straightforward but advisable results for practicing engineers.