Light shelves have been discussed in numerous studies as suitable solutions for controlling daylight in side-lit spaces. It is a system that can be easily modified, offering a range of design solutions. It can be easily mounted on the exterior and/or the interior of a vertical opening, it can come in various shapes from static flat forms to curved reflective surfaces, or it can even be actively controlled. A light shelf can offer shading and at the same time can redirect a significant part of the incoming light flux towards the ceiling improving daylight uniformity. Due to the aforesaid functions, light shelves are among the most popular system design solutions when it comes to daylight exploitation. The purpose of this paper is twofold. Firstly, to present the main research findings in relation to light shelves as daylighting systems and secondly to analyze the results, trying to establish a common basis for some efficient and practical design rules. The present paper is a review of the research realized in the last three decades concerning these systems together with their associated implications in a building’s daylight performance as well as in its energy balance in a few cases. In addition, the critical review of their design principles is included, which makes the presented information useful for design teams trying to select the optimal available system for any specific project.
Daylight utilization significantly contributes to energy savings in office buildings. However, daylight integration requires careful design so as to include variations in daylight availability and maintain a balance between factors such as lighting quality and heat gain or loss. Designers with proper planning can not only improve the visual environment and create higher-quality spaces, but simultaneously minimize energy costs for buildings. The utilization of photosensors can exploit the benefits of daylighting by dimming the lighting system, so that no excessive luminous flux is produced, thus leading to energy savings as well as visual contentment. However, the human factor is crucial for the proper function of a lighting control system. Without its acceptance from the users, energy savings can be minimized or even negligible. The objective of this paper is to present a post-occupancy evaluation regarding occupant satisfaction and acceptance in relation to daylighting in offices equipped with automated daylight controls. In addition, the response of the users was compared with lighting measurements that were performed during the post-occupancy evaluation. Three case studies of office buildings with installed daylight-harvesting systems were examined. The age of the occupants was a crucial factor concerning their satisfaction in relation to the lighting levels. Aged users were more comfortable with lighting levels over 500lx, while young users were satisfied with 300lx. The impact of different control algorithms was outlined, with the integral reset algorithm performing poorly. The acceptance of the users for the closed loop systems maintained the expected energy savings of the daylight harvesting technique. Most of the occupants preferred to use daylight as a light source combined with artificial light but having the control to either override or switch it on and off at will. The results shown that a post-occupancy survey along with lighting measurements are significant for making an office environment a humancentric one.
1 January 2020 in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
The aim of this work is to assess the impacts, both in terms of daylight efficiency and energy impacts, of an advanced daylighting system that utilizes a heliostatic configuration for sunlight redirection in a deep South oriented office room in two (2) different climate conditions. Conventional daylighting systems such as windows, and clerestories placed on building facades, for a variety of reasons, have been proven ineffective in solving the problem of deep interior daylighting. This effect even with the use of modern daylighting techniques can effectively maintain the required illuminances. In such cases, systems that are designed to take advantage both the direct and diffuse natural light while maintaining and improving occupant visual comfort, particularly at greater distances from the external walls can provide higher work-plane illuminance levels deeper into the space. The results summarized here demonstrate that, if selected according to daylight climate and integrated appropriately with electric lighting controls, the system can enhance daylight in building interiors and thereby promote energy savings. It should be noted, however, that the performance of these systems is dependent on daylight availability. Nonetheless, the information presented in this paper demonstrates the potential benefits and shortcomings from the use of sunlighting technologies in different climate zones.