Bioinformatics has emerged as a valuable tool for screening drugs and understanding their effects. This systematic review aimed to evaluate whether in silico studies using anti-obesity peptides targeting therapeutic pathways for obesity, when subsequently evaluated in vitro and in vivo, demonstrated effects consistent with those predicted in the computational analysis. The review was framed by the question: “What peptides or proteins have been used to treat obesity in in silico studies?” and structured according to the acronym PECo. The systematic review protocol was developed and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022355540) in accordance with the PRISMA-P, and all stages of the review adhered to these guidelines. Studies were sourced from the following databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, Virtual Heath Library, and EMBASE. The search strategies resulted in 1015 articles, of which, based on the exclusion and inclusion criteria, 7 were included in this systematic review. The anti-obesity peptides identified originated from various sources including bovine alpha-lactalbumin from cocoa seed (Theobroma cacao L.), chia seed (Salvia hispanica L.), rice bran (Oryza sativa), sesame (Sesamum indicum L.), sea buckthorn seed flour (Hippophae rhamnoides), and adzuki beans (Vigna angularis). All articles underwent in vitro and in vivo reassessment and used molecular docking methodology in their in silico studies. Among the studies included in the review, 46.15% were classified as having an “uncertain risk of bias” in six of the thirteen criteria evaluated. The primary target investigated was pancreatic lipase (n = 5), with all peptides targeting this enzyme demonstrating inhibition, a finding supported both in vitro and in vivo. Additionally, other peptides were identified as PPARγ and PPARα agonists (n = 2). Notably, all peptides exhibited different mechanisms of action in lipid metabolism and adipogenesis. The findings of this systematic review underscore the effectiveness of computational simulation as a screening tool, providing crucial insights and guiding in vitro and in vivo investigations for the discovery of novel anti-obesity peptides.

In the age of information technology and the additional computational search tools and software available, this systematic review aimed to identify potential therapeutic targets for obesity, evaluated in silico and subsequently validated in vivo. The systematic review was initially guided by the research question “What therapeutic targets have been used in in silico analysis for the treatment of obesity?” and structured based on the acronym PECo (P, problem; E, exposure; Co, context). The systematic review protocol was formulated and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022353808) in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items Checklist for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P), and the PRISMA was followed for the systematic review. The studies were selected according to the eligibility criteria, aligned with PECo, in the following databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, BVS, and EMBASE. The search strategy yielded 1142 articles, from which, based on the evaluation criteria, 12 were included in the systematic review. Only seven these articles allowed the identification of both in silico and in vivo reassessed therapeutic targets. Among these targets, five were exclusively experimental, one was exclusively theoretical, and one of the targets presented an experimental portion and a portion obtained by modeling. The predominant methodology used was molecular docking and the most studied target was Human Pancreatic Lipase (HPL) (n = 4). The lack of methodological details resulted in more than 50% of the papers being categorized with an “unclear risk of bias” across eight out of the eleven evaluated criteria. From the current systematic review, it seems evident that integrating in silico methodologies into studies of potential drug targets for the exploration of new therapeutic agents provides an important tool, given the ongoing challenges in controlling obesity.

Background: In silico studies using dynamic simulation or molecular docking have boosted the screening and identification of molecules and/or targets in studies aimed at treating diseases such as obesity and diabetes mellitus, optimizing the development of new drugs. This study aims to describe a systematic review protocol on peptides and proteins evaluated in silico as potential therapeutic agents for obesity or diabetes mellitus. Methods: This protocol followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Protocols and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (number: CRD42022355540). The databases to be searched will be PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, virtual health library, and EMBASE. It will be included in silico studies that evaluate the simulation by dynamics or molecular docking of proteins or peptides involved in treating obesity or diabetes mellitus. Two independent reviewers will select studies, extract data, and assess methodological quality using the adapted Strengthening the reporting of empirical simulation studies. A narrative synthesis of the included studies will be performed for the systematic reviews. Results: This protocol contemplates the production of 2 systematic reviews to be developed focusing on obesity or diabetes mellitus. Conclusion: The reviews will enable knowledge of peptides and proteins involved in research treating these diseases and will emphasize the importance of in silico studies in this context and for the development of future studies.