Marina G. Roscoe

Dr. Marina G. Roscoe


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2015 in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMarina G. Roscoe
Marina G. Roscoe
JMJosete B.C. Meira
Josete B.C. Meira
PCPaolo M. Cattaneo
Paolo M. Cattaneo

1 June 2021 in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMarina G. Roscoe
Marina G. Roscoe
PCPaolo M. Cattaneo
Paolo M. Cattaneo
MDMichel Dalstra
Michel Dalstra
OUOmar Melendres Ugarte
Omar Melendres Ugarte
JMJosete B.C. Meira
Josete B.C. Meira

1 September 2020 in International Orthodontics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KTKaren Christina Soares Tenório
Karen Christina Soares Tenório
MFMurilo Fernando Neupmann Feres
Murilo Fernando Neupmann Feres
CTCaio Junji Tanaka
Caio Junji Tanaka
MAMayara Karolyne Mello Augusto
Mayara Karolyne Mello Augusto
JRJosé Augusto Rodrigues
José Augusto Rodrigues
MRMarina G. Roscoe
Marina G. Roscoe

1 January 2022 in Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RARogéria Christina de Oliveira Aguiar
Rogéria Christina de Oliveira Aguiar
LNLarissa Pereira Nunes
Larissa Pereira Nunes
EBEduardo Silva Batista
Eduardo Silva Batista
MVMarina Mariante Viana
Marina Mariante Viana
MRMarcela Charantola Rodrigues
Marcela Charantola Rodrigues
MRMarina G. Roscoe
Marina G. Roscoe
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the antimicrobial activity and shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets to bovine enamel using experimental composites with different concentrations of silicon dioxide-coated silver nanoparticles (Ag@SiO2 NPs). Methods: Fifty bovine incisors were divided into five groups according to the composite (n = 10): G1 - Control Group (Transbond XT Resin), G2 - Experimental composite without Ag@SiO2 NPs; G3 - Experimental composite with 0.5% of Ag@SiO2 NPs; G4 - Experimental composite with 1% of Ag@SiO2 NPs; G5 - Experimental composite with 3% of Ag@SiO2 NPs. The SBS test was performed using a universal mechanical testing machine, and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was analyzed by optical microscopy. For the antimicrobial activity evaluation, Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) biofilm was formed for three days in hydroxyapatite discs. Posteriorly, S. mutans colony forming units (CFU) were evaluated. For SBS analysis, Analysis of Variance was used, followed by the Tukey test, at a 5% statistical significance level. The CFU data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis, followed by Dunn as a post-hoc test. The ARI results were analyzed descriptively. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in SBS values between the experimental and control groups (p>0.05). A 3% incorporation of Ag@SiO2 NPs statistically reduced the SBS values (p<0.05) compared to the 1% group. The addition of 3% of Ag@SiO2 NPs to the composites significantly reduced S. mutans biofilm formation, compared to group G2 (p<0.05). Conclusion: Composites incorporating 3% of Ag@SiO2 NPs presented similar SBS values compared to the control group, and showed significant antimicrobial activity.

1 January 2021 in Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MFMurilo Fernando Neuppmann Feres
Murilo Fernando Neuppmann Feres
FVFernanda Vicioni-Marques
Fernanda Vicioni-Marques
FRFábio Lourenço Romano
Fábio Lourenço Romano
MRMarina G. Roscoe
Marina G. Roscoe
VSVinícius Matsuzaki de Souza
Vinícius Matsuzaki de Souza
BBBruno Bueno-Silva
Bruno Bueno-Silva
Introduction: Although self-ligating brackets presumably provide better hygiene conditions, no consensus has been reached so far. Objective: Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate, in an in vitro experimental design, the adherence of Streptococcus mutans (SM) in self-ligating and conventional brackets of different manufacturers and ligature types. Methods: Four commercial brands of maxillary premolar metal brackets were tested (Abzil®; Morelli®; 3M Unitek®; and GAC®). Each one was subdivided into three groups, which varied according to the type of ligature and bracket model (metallic, elastic, and self-ligating), totalizing twelve groups, composed of six brackets each. Previously sterilized brackets were initially immersed in saliva for one hour, and subsequently washed and added in a bacterial suspension, maintained in aerobiosis for 72 hours. The adhered bacteria were then separated and quantified by colony forming units (CFU/mL) counting after 48 hours of growth. The groups were compared by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn post-hoc tests (p< 0.05). Results: Regardless of the commercial brand, self-ligating brackets had significantly less CFU/mL. However, according to comparisons performed within each commercial brand, only Abzil® self-ligating brackets had significantly lower biofilm adhesion. Among all of the self-ligating models, GAC® brackets presented the highest bacterial adhesion rate. Conclusions: Self-ligating brackets are likely to present lower rates of biofilm adhesion. Particularly, Abzil® and GAC® self-ligating brackets are less likely to accumulate biofilm. Although such results are derived from an in vitro study, practitioners might acknowledge findings concerning bacterial adhesion as one of the relevant features to be considered during bracket selection.

25 October 2022 in Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IGIvan Onone Gialain
Ivan Onone Gialain
LSLeonardo Folmer Rodrigues da Silva
Leonardo Folmer Rodrigues da Silva
MTMarlene Kasumi Gantier Takano
Marlene Kasumi Gantier Takano
RBRafael Yagüe Ballester
Rafael Yagüe Ballester
MRMarina G. Roscoe
Marina G. Roscoe
JMJosete Barbosa Cruz Meira
Josete Barbosa Cruz Meira
Statement of the problem: Narrow implants have been recommended in high esthetic demand regions to ensure greater buccal bone thickness (BBT) and minimize soft-tissue recession due to insufficient bone support. However, a limited area of bone-implant interface can increase the risk of peri-implant bone resorption due to occlusal forces. Purpose: This article encourages the use of evidence-based finite element analysis to optimize the aesthetic outcomes in maxillary lateral incisor single-supported implant crown by accurate biomechanical planning. This study aimed to analyze the best implant dimensions that would preserve the maximum BBT and avoid peri-implant bone resorption due to occlusal forces. Materials and methods: A maxilla segment was constructed based on anthropological measurements. Four implant diameters (Ø = 3.25; 3.50; 3.75 or 4.00 mm) and two lengths (L = 10 or 13 mm) were simulated. The occlusal force parameters were defined to simulate clinical conditions. The bone resorption risk analysis was based on Frost’s mechanostat theory altering the strain output to strain energy density (SED). The peri-implant bone resorption risk indexes (PIBRri) were calculated by dividing the average of the top ten SED elements of the cortical and trabecular buccal wall by the pathologic resorption limit for each bone. Results: For trabecular bone, only the model Ø4.00L13 exhibited a low PIBRri. For cortical bone, all models presented a low PIBRri, except for models Ø3.25. Conclusion: The selection of a 3.25 mm dental implant to preserve a 2 mm BBT should be avoided since it generates a high peri-implant bone resorption risk induced by occlusal overload.