Chronic non-communicable diseases are a significant public health problem and imbalanced nutrition is one of the most significant risk factor for them. The objective of this study was to examine Croatia’s general practitioners’ nutrition counselling practice and determine the factors that influence such practice. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 444 (17.0%) randomly selected general practitioners (GPs) in Croatia from May to July 2013 via a 32-item anonymous questionnaire. Study showed that 77.0% of participants had provided nutrition counselling exclusively to patients with specific health risks; 18.7% participants had provided nutrition counselling for all patients, regardless of their individual risks, while 4.3% had not provide nutrition counselling. As the most significant stimulating factor for implementing nutrition counselling in their daily work with patients, 55.6% of the participants identified personal interest regarding nutrition and the effects it has on health. The latter factor was more frequently emphasized among female general practitioners (p < 0.001) and general practitioners without chronic diseases (p < 0.001). The most significant barrier for nutrition counselling was lack of time (81.6%). It is necessary to make additional efforts to increase the frequency of nutrition counselling provided by general practitioners in Croatia. The majority of Croatian general practitioners could increase their nutrition counselling practice in order to promote balanced nutrition and improve the overall health status of their patients.

Background/Objectives: The Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is one of the most common causes of STIs, posing a significant public health problem. Today, the transmission of HPV can be very effectively prevented, making it important to vaccinate the target population at a young age. The aim of this study was to examine the attitudes and beliefs of parents regarding the HPV vaccine and the HPV vaccination of their child. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Osijek, Croatia, from June 2021 to September 2022 via a self-administered questionnaire and included 215 respondents. Results: The results showed that respondents who would vaccinate their child were significantly more likely to be those who work in the healthcare field, who had heard of the term HPV, who had sought information about the HPV vaccine on their own, and who had received information about vaccination from school doctors. The attitude towards vaccination was more negative among respondents who did not intend to vaccinate their child. In predicting the decision not to vaccinate one’s child against HPV, bivariate logistic regression revealed that the probability of non-vaccination increases with working outside the field of healthcare (OR = 4.61) and a negative attitude towards vaccination (OR = 1.46), while the probability of non-vaccination decreases if information was received from a school doctor (OR = 0.46). Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression showed that there is a significant model in predicting non-vaccination against HPV, consisting of two predictors: working outside the healthcare field (OR = 8.15) and a negative attitude towards vaccination (OR = 1.49). Conclusions: Given that parents are responsible for making the decision about HPV vaccination, it is necessary to invest additional efforts in educating them about the importance of preventing HPV infections and the benefits of HPV vaccination itself.

Introduction: Horne and Östberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) is a questionnaire widely used to assess the circadian typology.The aim of this study was to translate the MEQ from English into Croatian.Methods: The translation process included two independent forward translations, integration of the forward translation into a single translation, back-translation, back translation review and drafting of the final translation.Results: No semantic differences were observed when comparing the original and the back-translation; thus, only minimal alterations were done to the final translation, compared to the first one.Conclusions: The Croatian version of the MEQ is a reliable translation ready to be tested in a Croatian sample.

Background: Advances in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in recent decades have been primarily focused on its broader understanding in the context of the possibility of preventing the development and progression of the disease and of cardiovascular (CV) complications. Nevertheless, worldwide research indicates that individuals with T2D are still under-regulated, both in terms of glycemic control and in preventing CV complications. The aim of this study was to examine Croatian general practitioners (GPs)’ practice and patterns in prescribing antidiabetic medications and their understanding of guidelines. Methods: Research was conducted using a self-designed anonymous survey, which was delivered to the e-mail addresses of GPs throughout Croatia in digital format. Respondents were solely GPs, without any restrictions with regard to their characteristics. Data on the number of individuals diagnosed with T2D and prescribed a specific medication were based on declarations by respondents from their e-health records. Results: Approximately 59% of individuals with T2D are cared for solely by GPs. In terms of achieving targeted values of HbA1c, 47% of individuals with T2D are well regulated. Almost all the respondents claim that they review prescribed T2D therapy at least once a year. A total of 47.6% of respondents have read and entirely understood the EASD/ADA guidelines, but 58.3% apply the dual principles of controlling HbA1c levels and CV risk in the treatment of T2D. In individuals with associated CV comorbidity, SGLT2ins were the most frequently prescribed. Conclusions: The results indicate that Croatian GPs are still inclined to apply outdated paradigms of T2D treatment but that they are gradually accepting new regimens of care and recommendations for prescribing novel, more effective medications.

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are a diverse group of tumors that pose a major global health challenge. Early detection is crucial for reducing mortality from GI cancers; however, conventional screening methods are often invasive, costly, and uncomfortable, leading to low participation rates, particularly among asymptomatic individuals or those with limited healthcare access. The global incidence of GI cancers continues to rise, largely due to late-stage diagnoses associated with poor survival outcomes. Biomarkers – quantifiable indicators of biological processes or disease states – represent a valuable tool for improving early diagnosis and prognosis. This paper reviews current strategies, recent evidence on novel biomarkers, their strengths and limitations, and the challenges and opportunities for their translation into clinical practice. Future perspectives suggest that multimodal, personalized surveillance strategies integrating molecular biomarkers, imaging, and artificial intelligence may provide the best path forward in improving early detection and reducing the global burden of GI cancer.

Background/Objectives: Cancer places emotional and psychosocial demands on healthcare professionals; therefore, this study aimed to examine sociodemographic and psychosocial determinants, including emotional competence, empathy, and stigma, and to assess their interrelationships with mental health, attitudes towards cancer, and cancer-related stigma among healthcare professionals involved in cancer care. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2025 to January 2026 via a self-administered questionnaire among 264 hospital and primary care healthcare professionals in Osijek, Croatia (69 men and 195 women; median age 37 years, IQR 31–47, age range 20–64 years), all directly involved in providing healthcare to cancer patients in Croatia. Results: Significant differences were observed by gender, age, occupation, and workplace. Men were more frequently physicians and had higher education levels and socioeconomic status, whereas women achieved higher scores in emotional competence and empathy. Physicians more often had shorter overall work experience and reported greater perceived controllability of cancer. Age-related differences were found in perceived discrimination, stigma, and controllability of cancer. Primary healthcare professionals showed a higher level of empathy and proactivity and a lower perception of cancer as an incurable disease. Higher empathy was associated with lower stigma, while negative emotions and greater proactivity were associated with higher stigma, and emotional competence was a strong predictor of empathy. Conclusions: The study identified notable sociodemographic and psychosocial differences among healthcare professionals. Emotional competence strongly predicted empathy, which was inversely associated with cancer-related stigma, suggesting potential targets for interventions to improve attitudes towards cancer care. Furthermore, women exhibited significantly higher emotional competence and empathy than men, highlighting the importance of incorporating gender-specific perspectives into developing educational and support strategies for cancer healthcare professionals.