Microalgae have commercial potential in different sectors of the industry. Specifically in modern agriculture, they can be used because they have the ability to supply nutrients to the soil and produce plant growth hormones, polysaccharides, antimicrobial compounds, and other metabolites that improve agricultural productivity. Therefore, products formulated from microalgae as biofertilizers and biostimulants turn out to be beneficial for agriculture and are positioned as a novel and environmentally friendly strategy. However, these bioproducts present challenges in preparation that affect their shelf life due to the rapid degradation of bioformulated products. Therefore, this work aimed to provide a comprehensive review of biofertilizers and biostimulants from microalgae, for which a bibliometric analysis was carried out to establish trends using scientometric indicators, technological advances were identified in terms of formulation methods, and the global market for these bioproducts was analyzed.

The alarming levels of carbon dioxide (CO₂) are an environmental problem that affects the economic growth of the world. CO₂ emissions represent penalties and restrictions due to the high carbon footprint. Therefore, sustainable strategies are required to reduce the negative impact that occurs. Among the potential systems for CO₂ capture are microalgae. These are defined as photosynthetic microorganisms that use CO₂ and sunlight to obtain oxygen (O₂) and generate value-added products such as biofuels, among others. Despite the advantages that microalgae may present, there are still technical–economic challenges that limit industrial-scale commercialization and the use of biomass in the production of added-value compounds. Therefore, this study reviews the current state of research on CO₂ capture with microalgae, for which bibliometric analysis was used to establish the trends of the subject in terms of scientometric parameters. Technological advances in the use of microalgal biomass were also identified. Additionally, it was possible to establish the different cooperation networks between countries, which showed interactions in the search to reduce CO₂ concentrations through microalgae.

En este trabajo se evalúa el efecto de la concentración de nitrógeno y fósforo sobre la acumulación de Astaxantina en Haematococcus pluvialis UTEX 2505, utilizando un diseño de experimentos factorial 3². Las variables de respuestas cuantificadas fueron el crecimiento celular, la producción de Astaxantina, perfil lipídico y el módulo de Young de la membrana celular. Se encontró que la productividad celular aumenta al incrementar los niveles de nitrógeno, en contraste con las bajas concentraciones de nitrógeno y fósforo que muestra un efecto positivo sobre la producción de Astaxantina. El estrés generado por la limitación de nutrientes (fuente de nitrógeno y fósforo) disminuye la rigidez de la pared celular en la microalga. Como conclusión, para obtener concentraciones más altas de Astaxantina, es necesario limitar los niveles de nitrógeno y fósforo.

Microalgae have been characterized as an effective raw material for obtaining bioproducts from a biorefinery approach. However, production costs limit the large-scale production of microalgae, which makes these processes uncompetitive in the market. Therefore, in the present work, different agricultural fertilizers were evaluated as low-cost culture media for microalgae growth and the use of the biomass for biocrude production. The tests were carried out in three phases: phase I, Laboratory scale 1 L Erlenmeyer (Boeco, Hamburg, Germany) and phase II–III Pilot scale with cylindrical photobioreactors (PBRs) (Atb services S.A.S, Medellin, Colombia) with a capacity of 20 L. In phase I, four commercial fertilizers Crecilizer^® (C), Florilizer^® (F) (Fertilizer, Bogota, Colombia), AcuaLeaf Macros^® (Ma), and AcuaLeaf Micros^® (Mi) (Deacua, Medellin, Colombia) were tested separately and in combination (C + Ma, F + M, and Ma + Mi). The most effective treatments (C and F) in phase I were chosen for scale-up during phase II. In phase III, the concentration of the best treatment from phase II was increased. The biomass obtained from the best phase III treatment showed a cultivation medium cost 50% lower than the biomass obtained using Bold’s Basal Medium (BBM). Following each treatment, the harvested biomass was processed via hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) to yield biocrude. The reduction in culture medium cost contributed to an estimated 40% decrease in the relative biocrude yield cost.