Intercropping is considered by its advocates to be a sustainable, environmentally sound, and economically advantageous cropping system. Intercropping systems are complex, with non-uniform competition between the component species within the cropping cycle, typically leading to unequal relative yields making evaluation difficult. This paper is a review of the main existing metrics used in the scientific literature to assess intercropping systems. Their strengths and limitations are discussed. Robust metrics for characterising intercropping systems are proposed. A major limitation is that current metrics assume the same management level between intercropping and monocropping systems and do not consider differences in costs of production. Another drawback is that they assume the component crops in the mixture are of equal value. Moreover, in employing metrics, many studies have considered direct and private costs and benefits only, ignoring indirect and social costs and benefits of intercropping systems per se. Furthermore, production risk and growers’ risk preferences were often overlooked. In evaluating intercropping advantage using data from field trials, four metrics are recommended that collectively take into account all important differences in private costs and benefits between intercropping and monocropping systems, specifically the Land Equivalent Ratio, Yield Ratio, Value Ratio and Net Gross Margin.

Improving fertiliser nitrogen (N) use efficiency is essential to increase productivity and avoid environmental damage. Using a ¹⁵N mass balance approach, we investigated the effects of five N fertiliser management strategies to test the hypothesis that increasing uptake of applied N by wheat improves productivity and reduces loss of N in a semi-arid environment. Three experiments were conducted between 2012 and 2014. Treatments included urea application (50 kg N/ha) at sowing with and without nitrification inhibitor (3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, DMPP) and surface broadcast with and without urease inhibitor (n-butyl thiophosphoric triamide, NBPT) at the end of tillering plus an unfertilised control. It was found that deferring fertiliser application until the end of tillering decreased losses of fertiliser N (35–52%) through increasing uptake by the crop and or recovery in the soil at harvest, while maintaining yield except when rainfall following application was low. In this case, deferring application reduced fertiliser uptake (− 71%) and grain yield (− 18%) and increased recovery of N in the soil (+ 121%). Use of DMPP or NBPT reduced N loss where seasonal conditions were conducive to denitrification during winter (DMPP) and volatilisation or denitrification later in the season (NBPT). Their effect on grain yield was less significant; DMPP increased yield (+ 3–31%) in all years and NBPT increased yield (+ 7–11%) in 2 of 3 years compared to unamended urea. The majority of crop N uptake was supplied from soil reserves and as a result, crop recovery of applied N was not strongly related to grain yield response.

Frost damage to broadacre crops can cause up to an 85% loss in productivity. Although growers have few options for crop protection from frost, a rapid method for assessing frost-induced sterility would allow for timely management decisions (e.g., cutting for hay and altering marketing strategies). Spectral mixture analysis (SMA) has shown success in mapping landscape components and was used with hyperspectral data collected on the canopy, heads, and leaves of wheat at different sites to determine if this could quantify frost damage. Spectral libraries were assembled from canopy components collected from local field sites to generate spectral libraries for SMA from which a series of fraction sets was derived. The frost (Fr) fraction was then used to estimate final yield as a means of measuring frost damage. The best-fitting Fr fractions to yield were derived from the same data set as the source Fr spectra, and these ranged over R² = 0.58–0.75 at the canopy scale. It was clear that spectral signatures need to be collected at scale to assess frost damage. While Fr fractions were able to estimate yield there was no “universal” endmember set from which a Fr fraction could be derived. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) was not able to estimate frost damage consistently. Future work requires determining whether there is a “universal” set of endmembers and a minimum set of targeted wavebands that could lead to multispectral instruments for frost assessment for use in ground and aerial sensors.

Grains intended for human consumption or feedstock are typically high-value commodities that are marketed based on either their visual characteristics or compositional properties. The combination of visual traits, chemical composition and contaminants is generally referred to as grain quality. Currently, the market value of grain is quantified at the point of receival, using trading standards defined in terms of visual criteria of the bulk grain and chemical constituency. The risk for the grower is that grain prices can fluctuate throughout the year depending on world production, quality variation and market needs. The assessment of grain quality and market value on-farm, rather than post-farm gate, may identify high- and low-quality grain and inform a fair price for growers. The economic benefits include delivering grain that meets specifications maximizing the aggregate price, increasing traceability across the supply chain from grower to consumer and identifying greater suitability of differentiated products for high-value niche markets, such as high protein product ideal for plant-based proteins. This review focuses on developments that quantify grain quality with a range of spectral sensors in an on-farm setting. If the application of sensor technologies were expanded and adopted on-farm, growers could identify the impact and manage the harvesting operation to meet a range of quality targets and provide an economic advantage to the farming enterprise.

Intercropping using mixtures of dryland crop species for grain or seed production was investigated in southern Australia across a range of rainfall zones over three years. The objective was to understand the productivity and profitability of intercropping in extensive, high-input grain cropping systems. Previous research has shown large productivity benefits of mixtures; however, few farmers practice intercropping in Australia, and an analysis of profitability is needed to support future potential adoption. Experimental results showed strong mixture responses (in terms of yield, value and land equivalence), but not all were profitable compared to an equivalent share of monoculture crops (as measured by gross margins). The most promising mixtures were those containing high-value crops (canola) and legumes (field pea or faba bean) at the wetter sites where the additional gross margin over equivalent monoculture crops ranged from $12/ha to $576/ha. Mixtures containing highly competitive crops (wheat or barley) were generally unprofitable. Mixtures involving cereals were doubly disadvantaged by the aggressiveness of these lower-value crops in the mixtures we examined and the high grain separation costs post-harvest. Cost reduction in mixture systems involving high-value crops that are synergistic (grain legumes) should provide enduring opportunities for intercropping in southern Australia.