Objectives: To report the clinical performance of massively parallel sequencing‐based non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in detecting trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in over 140 000 clinical samples and to compare its performance in low‐risk and high‐risk pregnancies.Methods: Between 1 January 2012 and 31 August 2013, 147 314 NIPT requests to screen for fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13 using low‐coverage whole‐genome sequencing of plasma cell‐free DNA were received. The results were validated by karyotyping or follow‐up of clinical outcomes.Results: NIPT was performed and results obtained in 146 958 samples, for which outcome data were available in 112 669 (76.7%). Repeat blood sampling was required in 3213 cases and 145 had test failure. Aneuploidy was confirmed in 720/781 cases positive for trisomy 21, 167/218 cases positive for trisomy 18 and 22/67 cases positive for trisomy 13 on NIPT. Nine false negatives were identified, including six cases of trisomy 21 and three of trisomy 18. The overall sensitivity of NIPT was 99.17%, 98.24% and 100% for trisomies 21, 18 and 13, respectively, and specificity was 99.95%, 99.95% and 99.96% for trisomies 21, 18 and 13, respectively. There was no significant difference in test performance between the 72 382 high‐risk and 40 287 low‐risk subjects (sensitivity, 99.21% vs 98.97% (P = 0.82); specificity, 99.95% vs 99.95% (P = 0.98)). The major factors contributing to false‐positive and false‐negative NIPT results were maternal copy number variant and fetal/placental mosaicism, but fetal fraction had no effect.Conclusions: Using a stringent protocol, the good performance of NIPT shown by early validation studies can be maintained in large clinical samples. This technique can provide equally high sensitivity and specificity in screening for trisomy 21 in a low‐risk, as compared to high‐risk, population. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) slough off primary tumor tissues and are swept away by the circulatory system. These CTCs can remain in circulation or colonize new sites, forming metastatic clones in distant organs. Recently, CTC analyses have been successfully used as effective clinical tools to monitor tumor progression and prognosis. With advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) and single-cell sequencing (SCS) technologies, scientists can obtain the complete genome of a CTC and compare it with corresponding primary and metastatic tumors. CTC sequencing has been successfully applied to monitor genomic variations in metastatic and recurrent tumors, infer tumor evolution during treatment, and examine gene expression as well as the mechanism of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. However, compared with cancer biopsy sequencing and circulating tumor DNA sequencing, the sequencing of CTC genomes and transcriptomes is more complex and technically difficult. Challenges include enriching pure tumor cells from a background of white blood cells, isolating and collecting cells without damaging or losing DNA and RNA, obtaining unbiased and even whole-genome and transcriptome amplification material, and accurately analyzing CTC sequencing data. Here, we review and summarize recent studies using NGS on CTCs. We mainly focus on CTC genome and transcriptome sequencing and the biological and potential clinical applications of these methodologies. Finally, we discuss challenges and future perspectives of CTC sequencing.

The goal of this work was to investigate the molecular profiles and metastasis markers in Chinese patients with gastric carcinoma (GC). In total, we performed whole exome sequencing (WES) on 74 GC patients with tumor and adjacent normal formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples. The mutation spectrum of these samples showed a high concordance with TCGA and other studies on GC. PTPRT is significantly associated with metastasis of GC, suggesting its predictive role in metastasis of GC. Patients carrying BRCA2 mutations tend not to metastasize, which may be related to their sensitivity to chemotherapy. Mutations in MACF1, CDC27, HMCN1, CDH1 and PDZD2 were moderately enriched in peritoneal metastasis (PM) samples. Furthermore, we found two genomic regions (1p36.21 and Xq26.3) were associated with PM of GC, and patients with amplification of 1p36.21 and Xq26.3 have a worse prognosis (P = 0.002, 0.01, respectively). Our analysis provides GC patients with potential markers for single and combination therapies.

Pathological examination is the gold standard for cancer diagnosis, and breast tumor cells are often found in clusters. We report a case study on one triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patient, analyzing tumor development, metastasis, and prognosis with simultaneous DNA and RNA sequencing of pathologist-defined cell clusters from multiregional frozen sections. The cell clusters are isolated by laser capture microdissection (LCM) from primary tumor tissue, lymphatic vessels, and axillary lymph nodes. Data are reported for a total of 97 cell clusters. A combination of tumor cell-cluster clonality and phylogeny reveals 3 evolutionarily distinct pathways for this patient, each associated with a unique mRNA signature, and each correlated with disparate survival outcomes. Hub gene analysis indicates that extensive downregulation of ribosomal protein mRNA is a potential marker of poor prognosis in breast cancer.

This study was conducted to investigate oropharyngeal microbiota alterations during the progression of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by analyzing these alterations during the infection and clearance processes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed by using positive SARS-CoV-2 quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The alterations in abundance, diversity, and potential function of the oropharyngeal microbiome were identified using metatranscriptomic sequencing analyses of oropharyngeal swab specimens from 47 patients with COVID-19 (within a week after diagnosis and within two months after recovery from COVID-19) and 40 healthy individuals. As a result, in the infection process of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the healthy individuals, the relative abundances of Prevotella, Aspergillus, and Epstein–Barr virus were elevated; the alpha diversity was decreased; the beta diversity was disordered; the relative abundance of Gram-negative bacteria was increased; and the relative abundance of Gram-positive bacteria was decreased. After the clearance of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the healthy individuals and patients with COVID-19, the above disordered alterations persisted in the patients who had recovered from COVID-19 and did not return to the normal level observed in the healthy individuals. Additionally, the expressions of several antibiotic resistance genes (especially multi-drug resistance, glycopeptide, and tetracycline) in the patients with COVID-19 were higher than those in the healthy individuals. After SARS-CoV-2 was cleared, the expressions of these genes in the patients who had recovered from COVID-19 were lower than those in the patients with COVID-19, and they were different from those in the healthy individuals. In conclusion, our findings provide evidence that potential secondary infections with oropharyngeal bacteria, fungi, and viruses in patients who have recovered from COVID-19 should not be ignored; this evidence also highlights the clinical significance of the oropharyngeal microbiome in the early prevention of potential secondary infections of COVID-19 and suggests that it is imperative to choose appropriate antibiotics for subsequent bacterial secondary infection in patients with COVID-19.