OSon behalf of members of the Australian Candidemia Study
on behalf of members of the Australian Candidemia Study
+4
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this work was to identify differences in incidence, risk factors, microbiology, treatment, and clinical outcome of candidemia in neonates, children, and adults that might impact on management. PATIENTS AND METHODS. Cases of candidemia in Australia were identified prospectively by blood culture surveillance over 3 years. Episodes of candidemia in neonatal, pediatric, and adult age groups were analyzed and compared. RESULTS. Of 1005 incident cases, 33 occurred in neonates, 110 in children, and 862 in adults. The respective annual age-specific incidences were 4.4, 0.9, and 1.8 per 100 000 population. Prematurity and ICU admission were major risk factors in neonates. Hematologic malignancy and neutropenia were significantly more frequent in children than in neonates and adults. Diabetes, renal disease, hemodialysis, and recent surgery were more common in adults. Candidemia was attributed to a vascular access device in 58% of neonates, 70% of children, and 44% of adults. Candida albicans caused ∼48% of cases in all of the age groups. Candida parapsilosis was significantly more common in neonates and children (42% and 38% vs 15%). Candida glabrata was infrequent in neonates and children (9% and 3% vs 17%). Significantly more isolates from children were susceptible to fluconazole compared with those from adults (95% vs 75%). Fluconazole-resistant candidal isolates were infrequent in all of the age groups. Neonates and children were more likely to receive amphotericin B compared with adults. Adults were more likely to receive fluconazole. Survival rates at 30 days were 78% in neonates, 90% in children, and 70% in adults. CONCLUSIONS. This study identifies significant differences in candidemia in neonates, children, and adults. Neonatologists and pediatricians must consider age-specific differences when interpreting adult studies and developing treatment and prevention guidelines.
Recurrent acute otitis media (rAOM, recurrent ear infection) is a common childhood disease caused by bacteria termed otopathogens, for which current treatments have limited effectiveness. Generic probiotic therapies have shown promise, but seem to lack specificity. We hypothesised that healthy children with no history of AOM carry protective commensal bacteria that could be translated into a specific probiotic therapy to break the cycle of re-infection. We characterised the nasopharyngeal microbiome of these children (controls) in comparison to children with rAOM (cases) to identify potentially protective bacteria. As some children with rAOM do not appear to carry any of the known otopathogens, we also hypothesised that characterisation of the middle ear microbiome could identify novel otopathogens, which may also guide the development of more effective therapies. Middle ear fluids, middle ear rinses and ear canal swabs from the cases and nasopharyngeal swabs from both groups underwent 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The nasopharyngeal microbiomes of cases and controls were distinct. We observed a significantly higher abundance of Corynebacterium and Dolosigranulum in the nasopharynx of controls. Alloiococcus, Staphylococcus and Turicella were abundant in the middle ear and ear canal of cases, but were uncommon in the nasopharynx of both groups. Gemella and Neisseria were characteristic of the case nasopharynx, but were not prevalent in the middle ear. Corynebacterium and Dolosigranulum are characteristic of a healthy nasopharyngeal microbiome. Alloiococcus, Staphylococcus and Turicella are possible novel otopathogens, though their rarity in the nasopharynx and prevalence in the ear canal means that their role as normal aural flora cannot be ruled out. Gemella and Neisseria are unlikely to be novel otopathogens as they do not appear to colonise the middle ear in children with rAOM.
13 February 2017 in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy