Paul Pavelic

Dr. Paul Pavelic


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 August 2012 in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Murali Krishna GummaMurali Krishna Gumma
Murali Krishna Gumma
PPPaul Pavelic
Paul Pavelic

22 July 2013 in Water International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PPPaul Pavelic
Paul Pavelic
KVKaren G. Villholth
Karen G. Villholth
YSYunqiao Shu
Yunqiao Shu
LRLisa-Maria Rebelo
Lisa-Maria Rebelo
VSVladimir Smakhtin
Vladimir Smakhtin
The abundance of groundwater resources of Sub-Saharan Africa is generally well recognized, but quantitative estimates of their potential for irrigation development are lacking. This study derives estimates using a simple and generic water balance approach and data from secondary sources for 13 countries. Even with conservative assumptions and accounting for water demands from other sectors, including the environment, a 120-fold increase (by 13.5 million hectares) in the area under groundwater irrigation is possible for the countries considered. This expansion could improve the livelihoods of approximately 40% of the present-day rural population.

4 April 2020 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMohammad Faiz Alam
Mohammad Faiz Alam
PPPaul Pavelic
Paul Pavelic
NSNavneet Sharma
Navneet Sharma
ALOK SIKKAALOK SIKKA
ALOK SIKKA
The managed aquifer recharge (MAR) of excess monsoonal runoff to mitigate downstream flooding and enhance groundwater storage has received limited attention across the Indo-Gangetic Plain of the Indian subcontinent. Here, we assess the performance of a pilot MAR trial carried out in the Ramganga basin in India. The pilot consisted of a battery of 10 recharge wells, each 24 to 30 m deep, installed in a formerly unused village pond situated adjacent to an irrigation canal that provided river water during the monsoon season. Over three years of pilot testing, volumes ranging from 26,000 to 62,000 m3 were recharged each year over durations ranging from 62 to 85 days. These volumes are equivalent to 1.3–3.6% of the total recharge in the village, and would be sufficient to irrigate 8 to 18 hectares of rabi season crop. High inter-year variation in performance was observed, with yearly average recharge rates ranging from 430 to 775 m3 day−1 (164–295 mm day−1) and overall average recharge rates of 580 m3 day−1 (221 mm day−1). High intra-year variation was also observed, with recharge rates at the end of recharge period reducing by 72%, 88% and 96% in 2016, 2017 and 2018 respectively, relative to the initial recharge rates. The observed inter- and intra-year variability is due to the groundwater levels that strongly influence gravity recharge heads and lateral groundwater flows, as well as the source water quality, which leads to clogging. The increase in groundwater levels in response to MAR was found to be limited due to the high specific yield and transmissivity of the alluvial aquifer, and, in all but one year, was difficult to distinguish from the overall groundwater level rise due to a range of confounding factors. The results from this study provide the first systematic, multi-year assessment of the performance of pilot-scale MAR harnessing village ponds in the intensively groundwater irrigated, flood prone, alluvial aquifers of the Indo-Gangetic Plain.

6 October 2017 in Sustainable Water Resources Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Pennan ChinnasamyPennan Chinnasamy
Pennan Chinnasamy
LMLal Muthuwatta
Lal Muthuwatta
NENishadi Eriyagama
Nishadi Eriyagama
PPPaul Pavelic
Paul Pavelic
SLSurinaidu Lagudu
Surinaidu Lagudu

11 December 2017 in Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GLGuillaume Lacombe
Guillaume Lacombe
SDSomphasith Douangsavanh
Somphasith Douangsavanh
SVSinxay Vongphachanh
Sinxay Vongphachanh
PPPaul Pavelic
Paul Pavelic
Groundwater recharge remains almost totally unknown across the Mekong River Basin, hindering the evaluation of groundwater potential for irrigation. A regional regression model was developed to map groundwater recharge across the Lower Mekong Basin where agricultural water demand is increasing, especially during the dry season. The model was calibrated with baseflow computed with the local-minimum flow separation method applied to streamflow recorded in 65 unregulated sub-catchments since 1951. Our results, in agreement with previous local studies, indicate that spatial variations in groundwater recharge are predominantly controlled by the climate (rainfall and evapotranspiration) while aquifer characteristics seem to play a secondary role at this regional scale. While this analysis suggests large scope for expanding agricultural groundwater use, the map derived from this study provides a simple way to assess the limits of groundwater-fed irrigation development. Further data measurements to capture local variations in hydrogeology will be required to refine the evaluation of recharge rates to support practical implementations.

23 December 2017 in Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MVMathieu Viossanges
Mathieu Viossanges
PPPaul Pavelic
Paul Pavelic
LRLisa-Maria Rebelo
Lisa-Maria Rebelo
GLGuillaume Lacombe
Guillaume Lacombe
TSTouleelor Sotoukee
Touleelor Sotoukee
This study focuses on Laos, a landlocked nation located in South-East Asia with sub-tropical climate and highly seasonal rainfall distribution. Laos is one of the world’s least developed countries, and currently witnesses an unprecedented level of development that is highly reliant on its natural resources, including groundwater. There is currently very limited data and no nationwide assessment of shallow (<30 m) groundwater resources to support sustainable management. This study provides a first step towards addressing this issue by (i) identifying the major aquifer units of the country; (ii) integrating localized data and regional maps into an assessment of the groundwater potential; and (iii) producing quantitative maps of key hydrogeological indicators. Eight aquifer units have been described and evaluated: (i) Basement aquifers, (ii) Volcanic aquifers, (iii) Schists, (iv) Paleozoic sedimentary, (v) Karsts, (vi) Limestones, (vii) Mesozoic sedimentary and (viii) Alluvial sediments. The Mesozoic sandstones and the Alluvial aquifers are the most extensive and productive hydrogeological systems in the country. The Volcanic and Karstic aquifers, although poorly known, might also have important potential. This assessment, along with the maps of quantitative aquifer indicators, provide a significant improvement in both spatial resolution and accuracy compared to previously available information. It will likely support improved management plans and the identification of areas with higher potential for groundwater development.