Correct classification of irritability is extremely important to assess prognosis and treatment indications of juvenile mood disorders. We assessed factors associated with low versus high parent- and self-rated irritability using the affective reactivity index (ARI) in a sample of 289 adolescents diagnosed with a bipolar or a major depressive disorder. Bivariate analyses were followed by multilinear logistic regression model. Factors significantly and independently associated with high versus low parent-rated ARI score were: more severe emotional dysregulation and bipolar disorders diagnosis. Factors significantly and independently associated with high versus low self-rated ARI score were: lower children depression rating scale (CDRS-R) difficulty of having fun item score, greater children depression inventory (CDI-2) self-report score, more severe emotional dysregulation, and greater CDRS-R appetite disturbance item score. High parent-rated irritability was strictly related with a bipolar disorder diagnosis, whereas high youth-rated irritability was related to depressive phenotype characterized by appetite/food-intake dysregulation, mood lability, and less anhedonia and apathy.

Background: Emotional dysregulation (ED) is a transdiagnostic construct implicated in a broad range of psychiatric conditions. However, the influence of gender on ED remains understudied, particularly among adolescents with severe mood and behavioral disorders. Furthermore, few studies have controlled for confounding effects of specific psychiatric diagnoses. Methods: We assessed 182 adolescents (80.8% female; mean age 15.7 years) referred to our clinical institution. Participants completed the Cyclothymic–Hypersensitive Temperament Questionnaire (CHTQ), the Reactivity, Intensity, Polarity, and Stability Questionnaire (RIPoSt-Y), and the K-SADS-PL interview. Results: Females reported significantly higher levels of CHTQ mood lability (7.53 vs. 5.94, p = 0.012), RIPoSt-Y affective instability (62.33 vs. 53.31, p = 0.023), and interpersonal sensitivity (30.80 vs. 24.97, p < 0.001). They also exhibited higher rates of cyclothymic–hypersensitive temperament (46.6% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.001). Regression analysis revealed that gender and specific psychiatric diagnoses exerted significant independent effects on ED dimensions. Mood lability/hypersensitivity was significantly predicted by bipolar disorder (p = 0.001), depressive disorder (p = 0.002), and female sex (p = 0.025). Affective instability was independently predicted by bulimia nervosa (p = 0.019), depressive disorder (p = 0.004), and female sex (p = 0.033). Significant predictors for interpersonal sensitivity included female sex (p = 0.002), depressive disorder (p = 0.008), bulimia nervosa (p = 0.044), and the absence of conduct disorder (p = 0.048). Conclusions: Female adolescents with severe psychiatric presentations exhibited higher levels of ED, specifically regarding mood lability, affective instability, and interpersonal sensitivity. These associations persisted independently of current mood disorder diagnoses or comorbidities. While findings from this clinical cohort may not be fully generalizable to the general population, they highlight the need for gender-informed clinical interventions for adolescents characterized by severe ED.