Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most lethal subtype of breast cancer. TNBC diagnoses account for approximately one-fifth of all breast cancer cases globally. The lack of receptors for estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2, CD340) results in a lack of available molecular-based therapeutics. This increases the difficulty of treatment and leaves more traditional as well as toxic therapies as the only available standards of care in many cases. Recurrence is an additional serious problem, contributing substantially to its higher mortality rate as compared to other breast cancers. Tumor heterogeneity also poses a large obstacle to treatment approaches. No driver of tumor development has been identified for TNBC, and large variations in mutational burden between tumors have been described previously. Here, we describe the biology of six different subtypes of TNBC, based on differential gene expression. Subtype differences can have a large impact on metastatic potential and resistance to treatment. Emerging antibody-based therapeutics, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, have available targets for small subsets of TNBC patients, leading to partial responses and relatively low overall efficacy. Immuno-oncolytic viruses (OVs) have recently become significant in the pursuit of effective treatments for TNBC. OVs generally share the ability to ignore the heterogeneous nature of TNBC cells and allow infection throughout a treated tumor. Recent genetic engineering has allowed for the enhancement of efficacy against certain tumor types while avoiding the most common side effects in non-cancerous tissues. In this review, TNBC is described in order to address the challenges it presents to potential treatments. The OVs currently described preclinically and in various stages of clinical trials are also summarized, as are their strategies to enhance therapeutic potential.

Over the past several decades, advancements in the treatment of BRAF-mutant melanoma have led to the development of BRAF inhibitors, BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations, anti-PD-1 therapy, and anti-CTLA4 therapy. Although these therapies have shown substantial efficacy in clinical trials, their sustained effectiveness is often challenged by the tumor microenvironment, which is a highly heterogeneous and complex milieu of immunosuppressive cells that affect tumor progression. The era of personalized medicine holds substantial promise for the tailoring of treatments to individual genetic profiles. However, tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion mechanisms contribute to the resistance to immunotherapy. Despite these challenges, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy, as exemplified by lifileucel, has demonstrated notable efficacy against BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. Additionally, early response biomarkers, such as COX-2 and MMP2, along with FDG-PET imaging, offer the potential to improve personalized immunotherapy by predicting patient responses and determining the optimal treatment duration. Future efforts should focus on reducing the T-cell harvesting periods and costs associated with TIL therapy to enhance efficiency and accessibility.

Skin grafting is a critical procedure for treating skin defects from burns, trauma, and surgical interventions, yet complications such as ischemia, necrosis, and infection can limit graft success. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) has emerged as a promising adjunctive treatment that enhances skin graft viability through mechanisms including enhanced oxygenation, angiogenesis, reduced inflammation, and anti-infective effects. This review synthesizes findings from clinical studies, comparative analyses, and case reports to clarify HBOT’s efficacy in improving skin graft outcomes. Methods include a comprehensive analysis of HBOT’s impact on graft take rates, healing times, and complication rates. Results indicate that HBOT significantly improves graft survival by mitigating ischemia and infection, while comparative studies show a reduction in major amputations and improved healing in complex cases, such as diabetic foot ulcers and traumatic injuries. These findings suggest that HBOT can serve as a valuable adjunct to standard grafting procedures, offering a multifaceted approach to improve graft viability, especially in high-risk cases. This review highlights HBOT’s potential for integration into wound management protocols, providing a foundation for further exploration into its efficacy and applications in reconstructive surgery.

Background: Research advancing effective treatments for breast cancer is crucial for eradicating the disease, reducing recurrence, and improving survival rates. Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), a common method for treating breast cancer, often leads to complications requiring re-operation. Despite advancements, the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for treating these complications remains underexplored. Therefore, we analyze the efficacy of HBOT in the post-operative care of patients undergoing NSM. Methods: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were assessed for eligibility using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) framework and classified based on American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) levels of evidence. Seven studies, totaling a pool of 63 female patients, met the inclusion criteria. Among these studies, four were categorized as Level III (57.1%), one as Level IV (14.3%), and two as Level V (28.6%). These studies focused on HBOT’s role in wound healing, the successful salvage of breast reconstruction, and the optimal timing for HBOT. Results: This review revealed that HBOT indeed has potential for improving tissue oxygenation, vascularization, and, consequently, wound healing. It is noted that HBOT is efficacious for mitigating post-NMS complications, including infections, re-operation, flap loss, seroma, and hematoma. Conclusions: Overall, HBOT could be beneficial in standard post-surgical care protocols for patients undergoing NSM due to its role in mitigating common adverse effects that occur after mastectomy. Despite promising outcomes, the recent literature lacks rigorous clinical trials and well-defined control groups, underscoring the need for further research to establish standardized HBOT protocols.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is one of the most common non-melanoma skin cancers, and particularly challenging to treat in advanced or metastatic stages. Traditional therapies, including chemotherapy and radiation, often result in limited efficacy and severe side effects. Cosibelimab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting PD-L1, has emerged as a promising immunotherapy for advanced CSCC. In this review, we evaluate the therapeutic potential of cosibelimab by analyzing its mechanism of action, clinical trial data, and its role compared to other PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab and cemiplimab. We synthesized the available preclinical and clinical data on cosibelimab, focusing on published Phase I and II trial results involving 76 patients. Objective response rates (ORRs), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles were compared between cosibelimab, pembrolizumab, and cemiplimab. Mechanistic insights into cosibelimab’s dual action, including PD-L1 blockade and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), were also explored. Phase II trials demonstrated an ORR of 47.5%, with a median PFS of 12.9 months in advanced CSCC patients. Cosibelimab demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with predominantly mild to moderate adverse events. Comparative analysis with pembrolizumab and cemiplimab showed similar efficacy, although long-term survival data for cosibelimab is still emerging. Given its efficacy and safety, cosibelimab holds promise not only as a monotherapy but also for future exploration in combination regimens and broader oncologic indications. Future trials are required to validate its long-term outcomes, including overall survival, and to explore its use in combination therapies and neoadjuvant/adjuvant settings.

Precision medicine has revolutionized the approach to breast cancer treatment by leveraging molecular subtyping, biomarker identification, genomic profiling, and targeted therapies. This comprehensive review explores the significance of breast cancer subtypes—Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2+, and triple-negative—and their respective molecular characteristics and prognoses. It discusses the pivotal role of biomarkers such as HER2, estrogen receptors (ER), and progesterone receptors (PR) in predicting prognosis and therapy response. The review delves into advanced genomic profiling techniques, including next-generation sequencing (NGS) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and their implications for personalized treatment plans. Furthermore, it highlights the potential of liquid biopsies and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in non-invasive cancer diagnostics and monitoring. The integration of machine learning and artificial intelligence in predictive modeling and treatment algorithms is examined, along with the challenges posed by tumor heterogeneity and access to genomic testing. Future prospects, such as the expansion of CRISPR-based technologies and machine learning, are also discussed. Finally, strategies for integrating precision medicine into clinical practice and future innovations in the field are highlighted, emphasizing the importance of collaboration, patient education, and shared decision-making.