This study was conducted to compare and analyze whether Pilates exercise and yoga exercise help improve the performance of female fencers and prevent injury, and the dynamic balance test (LQ-YBT) and functional movement screening (FMS) test score of the elite adult female fencers were compared and analyzed as evaluation indicators. Participants were randomly classified into Pilates (n = 10) and yoga groups (n = 10), members of which took part in 50 min of exercise (5 min of warm-up, 40 min of main exercise, and 5 min of cool-down) twice weekly for eight weeks. The results obtained from this study were analyzed via independent t-test and 2-way ANOVA. The results were as follows: LQ-YBT measures (reaching distance) increased significantly for both groups, as did FMS scores (deep squat, hurdle step, inline lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight-leg raise, trunk-stability push-up, and rotary stability). These results suggest that Pilates exercise and yoga exercise might be likely effective in improving the performance of adult female fencers and injury prevention by increasing their dynamic balance ability and functional movement.

Aim: Evogliptin is a newly developed oral glucose-lowering medication of the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor class for type 2 diabetes mellitus. The combination of a DPP-4 inhibitor with pioglitazone is a promising therapeutic option. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between evogliptin and pioglitazone. Materials and Methods: A randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, three-treatment, three-period, six-sequence crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean male subjects. All subjects received evogliptin 5 mg once daily for 7 days (EVO), pioglitazone 30 mg once daily for 7 days (PIO) and co-administration of evogliptin 5 mg and pioglitazone 30 mg once daily for 7 days (EVO+PIO) according to the assigned sequence and period. Serial blood samples were collected for 24 hours for pharmacokinetic analysis and 3 hours after the oral glucose tolerance test for the pharmacodynamic analysis. Results: Thirty-four subjects completed the study. EVO+PIO and EVO showed a similar maximum plasma concentration at steady state (C_max,ss) and area under the concentration-time curve during the dosing interval at the steady state (AUC_τ,ss) of evogliptin, with geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90% confidence interval (CI)) of 1.01 (0.97– 1.05) and 1.01 (0.98– 1.04), respectively. EVO+PIO and PIO showed a similar C_max,ss and AUC_τ,ss of pioglitazone, with GMRs (90% CI) of 1.07 (0.99– 1.17) and 1.08 (0.99– 1.17), respectively. Reduction of the glucose level after EVO+PIO was larger compared to PIO and similar with EVO. Conclusion: Concomitant administration of evogliptin and pioglitazone showed similar glucose-lowering effects with those of evogliptin alone without pharmacokinetic interactions when compared to the intake of each drug alone.

Zastaprazan (JP‐1366) is a novel potassium‐competitive acid blocker for the treatment of acid‐related disorders. We aimed to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of zastaprazan, thereby characterizing the PK of zastaprazan in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as well as evaluating the impact of various covariates, including CYP2C19 phenotypes, on zastaprazan PK. This population PK analysis included zastaprazan plasma concentration–time data from 92 patients with erosive GERD and 68 healthy volunteers without any gastrointestinal disorders and was performed using nonlinear mixed‐effect modeling. Simulations were conducted to predict zastaprazan PK under various dosing regimens in patients with GERD. The plasma PK of zastaprazan was adequately described by a two‐compartment model with Erlang‐type absorption (six sequential compartments) and first‐order elimination. CYP2C19 phenotypes had no significant effect on zastaprazan PK. The disease status was identified as a significant covariate on apparent clearance of zastaprazan, showing lower values in patients with GERD compared to healthy volunteers. However, the model‐based simulation indicated that the impact of disease status on zastaprazan exposure was not clinically meaningful. Overall, the current population PK model successfully characterized the observed zastaprazan PK in both patients with GERD and healthy volunteers.

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a prodrug antiseizure medication for the treatment of focal seizures. ESL shows a well‐established pharmacokinetic (PK)‐pharmacodynamic relationship and has similar extrinsic epilepsy‐related factors across ethnicities. This study evaluated and compared ESL safety, tolerability, and PK characteristics between Korean and White subjects. A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, single‐ and multiple‐dose escalation study was conducted in healthy Korean and White adults. Participants randomly received a single dose and multiple oral doses of ESL (400–1600 mg) or placebo once daily for 11 days at a ratio of 8:2. Serial blood samples were collected to determine the plasma concentration of ESL and its metabolites (eslicarbazepine, [R‐licarbazepine and oxcarbazepine). Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study. A total of 29 Korean and 20 White subjects completed the study. The PK profiles of the metabolites of ESL were similar between Korean and White subjects. The geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of Korean to White subjects for the area under the concentration–time curve within a dosing interval of eslicarbazepine was 1.06 (0.97–1.17) and 0.96 (0.87–1.06) after multiple oral doses of 400 and 1600 mg ESL, respectively. Other PK parameters were also similar between the two ethnic groups. ESL was well‐tolerated in healthy Korean and White subjects, and its PK characteristics were similar between the two ethnic groups. The results of this study support to use the same dosage regimen of ESL in both White and Korean patients with seizures.