Ashwin Ramachandran

Prof. Ashwin Ramachandran

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 November 2020 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAshwin Ramachandran
Ashwin Ramachandran
DHDiego A. Huyke
Diego A. Huyke
ESEesha Sharma
Eesha Sharma
MSMalaya K. Sahoo
Malaya K. Sahoo
CHChunHong Huang
ChunHong Huang
Juan G. SantiagoJuan G. Santiago
Juan G. Santiago
Significance: Rapid, early-stage screening is crucial during pandemics for early identification of infected patients and control of disease spread. CRISPR biology offers new methods for rapid and accurate pathogen detection. Despite their versatility and specificity, existing CRISPR diagnostic methods suffer from the requirements of up-front nucleic acid extraction, large reagent volumes, and several manual steps—factors which prolong the process and impede use in low-resource settings. We here combine microfluidics, on-chip electric field control, and CRISPR to directly address limitations of current CRISPR diagnostic methods. We apply our method to the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples. Our method takes about 35 min from raw sample to result, a significant improvement over existing nucleic acid-based diagnostic methods for COVID-19.

1 April 2019 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SHSteven A. Hawks
Steven A. Hawks
ARAshwin Ramachandran
Ashwin Ramachandran
SPSlawomir Porada
Slawomir Porada
PCPatrick G. Campbell
Patrick G. Campbell
MSMatthew E. Suss
Matthew E. Suss
MSMichael Stadermann
Michael Stadermann
In the growing field of capacitive deionization (CDI), a number of performance metrics have emerged to describe the desalination process. Unfortunately, the separation conditions under which these metrics are measured are often not specified, resulting in optimal performance at minimal removal. Here we outline a system of performance metrics and reporting conditions that resolves this issue. Our proposed system is based on volumetric energy consumption (Wh/m3) and throughput productivity (L/h/m2) reported for a specific average concentration reduction, water recovery, and feed salinity. To facilitate and rationalize comparisons between devices, materials, and operation modes, we propose a nominal standard separation of removing 5 mM from a 20 mM NaCl feed solution at 50% water recovery. We propose this particular separation as a standard, but emphasize that the rationale presented here applies irrespective of separation details. Using our proposed separation, we compare the desalination performance of a flow-through electrode (fte-CDI) cell and a flow between membrane (fb-MCDI) device, showing how significantly different systems can be compared in terms of generally desirable desalination characteristics. In general, we find that performance analysis must be considered carefully so to not allow for ambiguous separation conditions or the maximization of one metric at the expense of another. Additionally, for context and clarity, we discuss a number of important underlying performance indicators and cell characteristics that are not performance measures in and of themselves but can be examined to better understand differences in performance.

12 May 2021 in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAshwin Ramachandran
Ashwin Ramachandran
Juan G. SantiagoJuan G. Santiago
Juan G. Santiago

1 May 2019 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAshwin Ramachandran
Ashwin Ramachandran
DODiego I. Oyarzun
Diego I. Oyarzun
SHSteven A. Hawks
Steven A. Hawks
MSMichael Stadermann
Michael Stadermann
Juan G. SantiagoJuan G. Santiago
Juan G. Santiago

24 August 2018 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAli Hemmatifar
Ali Hemmatifar
ARAshwin Ramachandran
Ashwin Ramachandran
KLKang Liu
Kang Liu
DODiego I. Oyarzun
Diego I. Oyarzun
MBMartin Z. Bazant
Martin Z. Bazant
Juan G. SantiagoJuan G. Santiago
Juan G. Santiago

22 June 2022 in Chemical Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ARAshwin Ramachandran
Ashwin Ramachandran
Juan G. SantiagoJuan G. Santiago
Juan G. Santiago
Isotachophoresis (ITP) is a versatile electrophoretic technique that can be used for sample preconcentration, separation, purification, and mixing, and to control and accelerate chemical reactions. Although the basic technique is nearly a century old and widely used, there is a persistent need for an easily approachable, succinct, and rigorous review of ITP theory and analysis. This is important because the interest and adoption of the technique has grown over the last two decades, especially with its implementation in microfluidics and integration with on-chip chemical and biochemical assays. We here provide a review of ITP theory starting from physicochemical first-principles, including conservation of species, conservation of current, approximation of charge neutrality, pH equilibrium of weak electrolytes, and so-called regulating functions that govern transport dynamics, with a strong emphasis on steady and unsteady transport. We combine these generally applicable (to all types of ITP) theoretical discussions with applications of ITP in the field of microfluidic systems, particularly on-chip biochemical analyses. Our discussion includes principles that govern the ITP focusing of weak and strong electrolytes; ITP dynamics in peak and plateau modes; a review of simulation tools, experimental tools, and detection methods; applications of ITP for on-chip separations and trace analyte manipulation; and design considerations and challenges for microfluidic ITP systems. We conclude with remarks on possible future research directions. The intent of this review is to help make ITP analysis and design principles more accessible to the scientific and engineering communities and to provide a rigorous basis for the increased adoption of ITP in microfluidics.