Early detection of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) is crucial. Whilst the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET scan has high diagnostic accuracy, it suffers from inter-reader variability, and the time-consuming reporting process. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (ID CRD42023456044) and aims to evaluate AI’s ability to enhance reporting, diagnostics, and predictive capabilities for mPCa on PSMA PET scans. Inclusion criteria covered studies using AI to evaluate mPCa on PSMA PET, excluding non-PSMA tracers. A search was conducted on Medline, Embase, and Scopus from inception to July 2023. After screening 249 studies, 11 remained eligible for inclusion. Due to the heterogeneity of studies, meta-analysis was precluded. The prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST) indicated a low overall risk of bias in ten studies, though only one incorporated clinical parameters (such as age, and Gleason score). AI demonstrated a high accuracy (98%) in identifying lymph node involvement and metastatic disease, albeit with sensitivity variation (62–97%). Advantages included distinguishing bone lesions, estimating tumour burden, predicting treatment response, and automating tasks accurately. In conclusion, AI showcases promising capabilities in enhancing the diagnostic potential of PSMA PET scans for mPCa, addressing current limitations in efficiency and variability.

Active surveillance remains a treatment option for low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) has emerged as a useful modality to assess intraprostatic lesions. This systematic review aims to evaluate PSMA PET/CT in localized low- to intermediate-risk PCa to determine its role in active surveillance. Following PRISMA guidelines, a search was performed on Medline, Embase, and Scopus. Only studies evaluating PSMA PET/CT in localized low- to intermediate-risk PCa were included. Studies were excluded if patients received previous treatment, or if they included high-risk PCa. The search yielded 335 articles, of which only four publications were suitable for inclusion. One prospective study demonstrated that PSMA PET/CT-targeted biopsy has superior diagnostic accuracy when compared to mpMRI. One prospective and one retrospective study demonstrated MRI occult lesions in 12.3–29% of patients, of which up to 10% may harbor underlying unfavorable pathology. The last retrospective study demonstrated the ability of PSMA PET/CT to predict the volume of Gleason pattern 4 disease. Early evidence demonstrated the utility of PSMA PET/CT as a tool in making AS safer by detecting MRI occult lesions and patients at risk of upgrading of disease.

Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is an important component in the staging and prognostication of prostate cancer. We performed a narrative review to assess the literature surrounding PLND: (I) the current guideline recommendations and contemporary utilization, (II) the calculation of patient-specific risk to perform PLND using available nomograms, (III) to review the extent of dissection, and its associated outcomes and complications. Due to the improved lymph node yield, better staging, and theoretical improvement in the control of micro-metastatic disease, guidelines have supported the use of (extended-) PLND in patients deemed to be at intermediate or high risk of lymph node involvement (often at a threshold of 5% on modern risk nomograms). However, in practice, real-world utilization of PLND varies considerably due to multiple reasons. Conflicting evidence persists with no clear oncological benefit to PLND, and a small, but important, risk of morbidity. Complications are rare, but include lymphoceles; thromboembolic events; and more rarely, obturator nerve, vascular, and ureteric injury. Furthermore, changing disease incidence and stage migration in the context of earlier detection overall have led to a decreased risk of nodal disease. The trade-offs between the benefits, harms, and risk tolerance/threshold must be carefully considered between each patient and their clinician.

Introduction: Urological cancers account for a significant portion of cancer diagnoses and mortality rates worldwide. The traditional treatment options of surgery and chemoradiation can have significant morbidity and become ineffective in refractory disease. The discovery of the CRISPR system has opened up new avenues for cancer research by targeting specific genes or mutations that play a role in cancer development and progression. In this review, we summarise the current state of research on CRISPR in urology and discuss its potential for improving the diagnosis and treatment of urological cancers. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The keywords included CRISPR and urology OR prostate OR renal OR bladder OR testicular cancer. Results: CRISPR has been used extensively in a preclinical setting to identify and target genes in prostate cancer, including AR, NANOG, ERβ, TP53, PTEN, and PD-1. Targeting PRRX2 and PTEN has also been shown to overcome enzalutamide and docetaxel resistance in vitro. In bladder cancer, CBP, p300, hTERT, lncRNA SNGH3, SMAD7e, and FOXA1 have been targeted, with HNRNPU knockout demonstrating tumour inhibition, increased apoptosis and enhanced cisplatin sensitivity both in vitro and in vivo. Renal cancer has seen CRISPR target VHL, TWIST1, PTEN, and CD70, with the first in-human clinical trial of Anti-CD70 CAR T cell therapy showing an excellent safety profile and durable oncological results. Lastly, testicular cancer modelling has utilised CRISPR to knockout FLNA, ASH2L, HMGB4, CD24, and VIRMA, with NAE1 found to be over-expressed in cisplatin-resistant germ cell colonies. Conclusions: CRISPR is a cutting-edge technology that has been used extensively in the pre-clinical setting to identify new genetic targets, enhance drug sensitivity, and inhibit cancer progression in animal models. Although CAR T cell therapy has shown promising results in RCC, CRISPR-based therapeutics are far from mainstream, with further studies needed across all urological malignancies.

Clinical History: A 72-year-old man undergoes a transurethral resection of a 1.5 cm bladder tumor completely obliterating the left ureteral orifice (UO). A radical cystectomy was performed as the tumor was found to be a high-grade pT2 urothelial carcinoma. A computed-tomography intravenous pyelogram phase clearly demonstrated a filling defect in the left lower pole and renal calix; however, an magnetic resonance imaging postcontrast failed to detect the same filling defects, possibly secondary to inadequate filling as the obstruction progressed. Physical Examination: Physical examination was unremarkable and vital signs were within normal parameters. Diagnosis: The history raises high clinical suspicion for an upper tract urothelial carcinoma. At a multidisciplinary team meeting, some surgeons advocated for a radical nephroureterectomy, others a unique drape technique that facilitates on-table pyeloscopy. Intervention: To investigate the upper tract filling defect, retrograde pyeloscopy was not possible because of the obliterated left UO. Our novel technique is the first described to facilitate on-table pyeloscopy with an open ureter that diverts ureteral fluid into a pouch instead of the abdomen after radical cystectomy when upper tract access is not otherwise possible. The diversion of ureteral fluid from the abdominal cavity minimizes the catastrophic theoretical risk of tumor seeding ^{1 – 5} that has been known to happen along percutaneous nephrostomy tracts. ⁶ Follow-up/Outcomes: The filling defect was most likely caused by a fungal ball seen on pyeloscopy, and as there were no signs of malignancy observed this patient was saved from a potential nephroureterectomy. No competing financial interests exist. No funding was received for this article. Authors have received and archived patient consent for video recording/publication in advance of video recording of procedure. Patient consent statement: “I give full informed consent to the research team for this research project including recording of the operation for the purposes of research and publication of a video and any written materials.” Runtime of video: 4 mins 56 secs