More than half of the world’s population live in areas with a potential risk of acquiring dengue fever (DF). Health education interventions are effective, barring a language communication gap. The objective of this study was to estimate the effect of health education in the knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) towards DF control and prevention in public and private schools. We assessed the DF control and prevention strategy KAP of students of eight public and private schools in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia before the dengue health education intervention sessions (pre-I) and three months following the education intervention sessions (post-I) using the same closed-ended validated questionnaire. Schools and students were selected by a multistage stratified random sample method. Statistical analysis was done using the paired and independent T-test in IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). We found a significant mean difference in the overall knowledge (pre-I, 7.86 ± 2.61; post-I, 10.94 ± 2.35), attitude (pre-I, 5.16 ± 1.50; post-I 6.23 ± 1.30), and practice (pre-I, 2.96 ± 1.33; post-I, 3.94 ± 1.12) scores. Private schools scored better post-intervention scores in knowledge and practice compared to public schools in local and English language medium. Health education programs are essential for DF prevention and management. Institutes whose populations consists of students with various language backgrounds should not be ignored. Bilingual educational sessions are important in such private institutes. Our results indicate additional emphasis is required on putting interventional knowledge into practice.
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global public health problem in many developing countries including Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Patient compliance with anti-tuberculosis treatment is a determining factor in controlling the spread of TB. This study compares the default rate and the perception of their treatment among TB patients being treated by means of a community mobile outreach approach, with those of patients being treated by means of a facility-based Directly Observed Treatment Short course (DOTS) in the Jeddah region of Saudi Arabia. A comparative cross-sectional study of 200 TB patients who presented at the Madain Alfahd Primary Health Care Center (PHCC) Jeddah, between January 2018 and November 2018 was undertaken. In one group, randomly assigned patients were served by mobile outreach teams who administered oral anti-TB treatment under the DOTS regime. In the other group, the patients were treated by means of the traditional facility-based DOTS treatment. A questionnaire measuring patient attitudes and understanding of the disease and their treatment modes was completed by patients at the beginning of their treatment, and again after 3 months. The results were analysed by means of independent and Paired T Tests, along with chi square analysis. We found that the overall default rate among those patients served by our mobile outreach team was only 3%, compared with a 22% default rate among non-mobile team treated patients (p = < 0.001). A major change in the attitude and understanding scores of patients was noted in both groups after 3 months. A significant difference was also noted in the mean compliance scores (mobile team served =58.43 and facility-based =55.55, p < 0.001) after 3 months of treatment. Our study indicated that treatment by means of our mobile outreach DOTS can offer an effective strategy for the treatment of TB patients. A reduced patient default rate and a better understanding of the disease and its treatment confirmed a positive impact of mobile outreach teams on these patients. Treating TB patients by means of mobile outreach teams can thus be recommended as a means for the cure and prevention of the further spread of the disease.
Background: By the end of 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic spread all around the world with a wide spectrum of clinical presentations ranging from mild to moderate to severe or critical cases. T cell subtype dysregulation is mostly involved in the immunopathogenic mechanism. The present study aimed to highlight the role of monitoring T cell subtypes and their activation (expression of CD38) in COVID-19 patients compared to healthy subjects and their role in predicting severity and patients’ outcomes. Materials: The study involved 70 adult COVID-19 confirmed cases stratified into three groups: a mild/asymptomatic group, a clinically moderate group, and a clinically severe/critical group. Flow cytometry analysis was used for the assessment of CD3+ cells for total T cell count, CD4+ cells for helper T cells (Th), CD8+ cells for cytotoxic T cells (Tc), CD4+CD25+ cells for regulatory T cells (T reg), and CD38 expression in CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells for T cell activation. Results: A statistically significant difference was found between COVID-19 cases and healthy controls as regards low counts of all the targeted T cell subtypes, with the lowest counts detected among patients of the severe/critical group. Furthermore, CD38 overexpression was observed in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Conclusion: Decreased T cell count, specifically CD8+ T cell (Tc), with T cell overactivation which was indicated by CD38 overexpression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells had a substantial prognostic role in predicting severity and mortality among COVID-19 patients. These findings can provide a preliminary tool for clinicians to identify high-risk patients requiring vigilant monitoring, customized supportive therapy, or ICU admission. Studies on larger patient groups are needed.
1 September 2019 in Journal of Infection and Public Health
Background: Saudi Arabia being a major pilgrimage center with an annual turnover of millions of pilgrims from all over the world has a high risk for transmission of infections; Ebola virus disease (EVD) being one of them. Health care workers (HCWs) are particularly vulnerable to these infections. The objectives of this research were to assess the overall knowledge and infection control practices of HCWs about EVD, and to evaluate and compare the role of pre deployment Hajj training of HCWs assigned Hajj duties with those HCWs who did not receive this training. Methods: Through a comparative cross sectional study design a randomly selected representative sample of HCWs who performed Hajj duties in 2015 were compared with those who were not part of Hajj. Participants were taken from different Makkah and Jeddah region hospitals. A validated self-administered questionnaire was used to assess EVD awareness of 1216 HCWs. Chi square test was applied to check the association between the two groups using SPSS 22. Results: Overall, medical practitioners had a higher level of knowledge (76.5%) about EVD (in-terms of average correct answers) compared to nurses (59.6%) and other HCWs (56.7%). There was relatively poor knowledge about the EVD management, the Ebola cases fatality rate and the risk of the health care workers from this infectious disease. However, it was obvious that the HCWs who performed Hajj duties and underwent pre-deployment training had more knowledge and better practices about EVD compared to the Non Hajj HCWs and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study concludes that even though the HCWs were well aware about EVD but there was a lack of practice. As infection control routine trainings are limited, gaps have been identified in knowledge and practice of infection control. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Limited on behalf of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Background: Little is known about morbidity patterns and healthcare utilization among specific Hajj pilgrim groups. This study examined influenza vaccination coverage, disease spectrum and healthcare utilization outcomes among Sudanese pilgrims during Hajj 2025. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using de-identified patient records from the Saudi Health Electronic Surveillance Network for Sudanese Hajj pilgrims in 1–9 June 2025. Data included demographics, influenza vaccination status, healthcare utilization metrics, morbidities and temporal distribution of visits. Comparisons between hospital and primary healthcare center (PHC) attendees were performed using appropriate statistical tests. Results: A total of 1130 pilgrims sought care, with 88.6% (n = 1001) attending PHCs and 11.4% (n = 129) hospitals. Their mean age was 49.7 ± 12.9 years, and 67.9% (n = 767) were male. Influenza vaccination coverage was 79% (893/1130); vaccinated pilgrims had lower incidence of influenza-like illness (ILI) compared to unvaccinated pilgrims (5.2% vs. 15.2%, p < 0.01). Respiratory illnesses were the most frequent diagnoses (40.8% in PHCs and 24.8% in hospitals), followed by musculoskeletal disorders (24.5% and 16.3%, respectively). Compared to PHCs, presentation rate for chronic diseases was higher in hospitals (19.4% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.001), so was the median clinic time (14.1 vs. 8.6 min, p < 0.001). Healthcare utilization peaked on days 3–5 coinciding with the ‘Arafat Day’. Conclusions: Sudanese pilgrims most commonly presented with acute respiratory conditions, with PHCs managing the majority of cases, and influenza vaccination was protective against ILI. Findings emphasize the need for strong primary care, efficient resource allocation, and targeted preventive strategies to safeguard pilgrims’ health in the future.
There have been multiple reports of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) testing positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) after discharge; however, information on the characteristics of such cases is limited. In this case report, we aimed to identify clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients who had a repeat positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2. We analyzed data of 22 COVID-19 patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing after two consecutive negative PCR results following discharge from hospitals. The interval between the two positive tests in the episodes of COVID-19 ranged from 4 to 117 days. More than one-third of the cases were healthcare workers (HCWs) and one-third of them had comorbidities. The main symptoms were cough and fever, and we noticed that males experienced more symptoms and signs of COVID-19 than females. Individuals with repeat SARS-CoV-2 positivity tend to experience milder illness during the second episode than the first episode. To confirm the reinfection of SARS-CoV-2, the results of other tests, such as viral culture and immunological assays of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM), need to be considered. Recovered COVID-19 patients should continue social distancing, using face masks, and practicing hand hygiene, especially HCWs who are more likely to be exposed to SARS-CoV-2.