Cardiomyopathies are a heterogeneous group of myocardial diseases representing the first cause of heart transplantation in children. Diagnosing and classifying the different phenotypes can be challenging, particularly in this age group, where cardiomyopathies are often overlooked until the onset of severe symptoms. Cardiovascular imaging is crucial in the diagnostic pathway, from screening to classification and follow-up assessment. Several imaging modalities have been proven to be helpful in this field, with echocardiography undoubtedly representing the first imaging approach due to its low cost, lack of radiation, and wide availability. However, particularly in this clinical context, echocardiography may not be able to differentiate from cardiomyopathies with similar phenotypes and is often complemented with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. The latter allows a radiation-free differentiation between different phenotypes with unique myocardial tissue characterization, thus identifying the presence and extent of myocardial fibrosis. Nuclear imaging and computed tomography have a complementary role, although they are less used in daily clinical practice due to the concern related to the use of radiation in pediatric patients. However, these modalities may have some advantages in evaluating children with cardiomyopathies. This paper aims to review the strengths and limitations of each imaging modality in evaluating pediatric patients with suspected or known cardiomyopathies.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) results from a complex interplay of age, genetic, cardiac remodeling, and concomitant comorbidities including hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Renal failure is an important comorbidity of HFpEF, as well as a major pathophysiological mechanism for those patients at risk of developing HFpEF. Heart failure (HF) and CKD are intertwined conditions sharing common disease pathways; the so-called “kidney tamponade”, explained by an increase in intracapsular pressure caused by fluid retention, is only the latest model to explain renal injury in HF. Recognizing the different phenotypes of HFpEF remains a real challenge; the pathophysiological mechanisms of renal dysfunction may differ across the HF spectrum, as well as the prognostic role. A better understanding of the role of cardiorenal interactions in patients with HF in terms of symptom status, disease progression, and prognosis remains essential in HF management. Historically, patients with HF and CKD have been scarcely represented in clinical trial populations. Current concerns affect the practical approach to HF treatment, and, in this context, physicians are frequently hesitant to prescribe and titrate both new and old treatments. Therefore, the extensive application of HF drugs in diverse HF subtypes with numerous comorbidities and different renal dysfunction etiologies remains a controversial matter of discussion. Numerous recently introduced drugs, such as sodium–glucose-linked transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), constitute a new therapeutic option for patients with HF and CKD. Because of their protective vascular and hormonal actions, the use of these agents may be safely extended to patients with renal dysfunction in the long term. The present review delves into the phenotype of patients with HFpEF and CKD from a pathophysiological perspective, proposing a treatment approach that suggests a practical stepwise algorithm for the proper application of life-saving therapies in clinical practice.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors represent one of the main cornerstones of heart failure treatment. Nevertheless, while the cardiovascular beneficial effects of these drugs have been clearly demonstrated by several clinical trials, in clinical practice, it remains challenging to identify the appropriate timing to start SGLT2 inhibitors. The potential risk of side effects, like genito-urinary infections and interaction with other drugs, may often lead to delay the prescription of these drugs in the acute setting. However, several studies have demonstrated the safety and the prognostic impact of SGLT2 inhibitors in the hospitalized patient, suggesting that treatment initiation during hospitalization or early post-discharge may represent an ideal therapeutic option. In this review, we discuss the main trials on early administration of SGLT2 inhibitors in acute heart failure supporting early introduction of SGLT2 inhibitors to optimize heart failure treatment. The efficacy and safety of these drugs in patients with acute myocardial infarction are also discussed. Based on the review of existing evidences, a practical flowchart on early administration of SGLT2 inhibitors in the acute setting is proposed.

Purpose: Although biomarkers of myocardial fibrosis and inflammation have been proposed as potential modulators of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), their clinical utility and interaction with echocardiographic parameters remain incompletely understood. This study aims to assess the dynamic changes in these biomarkers, their relationship with echocardiographic variables, and their association with structural response to CRT. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 86 consecutive patients referred for CRT with symptomatic heart failure, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤ 35%, QRS width ≥ 130 ms and LBBB morphology. We measured sST-2, Gal-3, NTpro-BNP and eGFR at baseline and after 1 year of CRT. An echocardiographic reduction of LV end-systolic volume ≥ 15% was used to define a patient as a responder to CRT. Results: The mean baseline and follow-up values of Gal-3 (responders: 24.1 [16.8;32] ng/mL, non-responders: 30 [20;39.3] ng/mL, p = 0.03) and sST2 (responders: 28.5 [20;36] ng/mL, non-responders: 34.5 [25;37.7] ng/mL, p = 0.03) were lower in responders than non-responders. Responders showed a significant reduction between baseline and follow-up values of ΔGal-3 (−12.1% vs. −2.5%, p = 0.04), ΔsST2 (−30.8% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001), ΔNT-proBNP (−16.4% vs. 5.2, p = 0.04) and ΔeGFR (6.7 ± 24.3% vs. -6.3 ± 27.9%, p = 0.03). At the multivariate analyses, baseline Gal-3 [cut-off: 38.5 ng/mL, AUC: 0.63, p = 0.03, (OR 7.13 [1.12;45.41], p = 0.03), together with TAPSE > 17.5 mm (OR 10.86 [3.15;37.44], p < 0.001) significantly correlated with the structural response to CRT in several prediction models. Among echocardiographic parameters, TAPSE remained the strongest predictive factor of positive response to CRT at the univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions: In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction undergoing CRT, Gal-3 and TAPSE are significantly associated with a positive structural response to CRT.

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) represents a heterogeneous clinical entity encompassing multiple ischemic mechanisms, including atherosclerotic plaque disruption, coronary artery spasm, coronary microvascular dysfunction, coronary embolism, and spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Despite the absence of obstructive coronary disease, patients with MINOCA remain at substantial risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, underscoring the need for accurate early diagnosis and effective risk stratification. In this context, accumulating evidence indicates that circulating serum biomarkers may provide additional pathophysiological and prognostic insights in patients with a working diagnosis of MINOCA. Moreover, distinct biomarker profiles may help support the differential diagnostic evaluation between MINOCA and other causes of acute myocardial injury, such as myocardial infarction with obstructive coronary arteries, myocarditis, and Takotsubo syndrome. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on serum biomarkers in MINOCA, highlights their potential role in guiding tailored diagnostic strategies, and discusses future perspectives toward biomarker-driven precision medicine in patients presenting with acute myocardial injury.