(1) Background: At present, the only potency assay approved in China for the in-country testing of botulinum toxin type A for injection products is the mouse bioassay (MBA). The Chinese market for neurotoxin products is rapidly expanding, but MBAs are subject to high variability due to individual variations in mice, as well as variations in injection sites, in addition to the limited number of batches tested for one MBA. Compared with the mLD₅₀ method, the cell-based potency assay (CBPA) developed for the potency testing of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX) by AbbVie not only does not use any experimental animals but also allows for significant time and cost savings. Due to the significant benefits conferred by the replacement of the mLD₅₀ assay with CBPA in China, the CBPA method has been transferred, validated, and cross-validated to demonstrate the equivalence of the two potency methods. (2) Methods: The differentiated SiMa cells were treated with both BOTOX samples and the reference standard, and the cleaved SNAP25₁₉₇ in the cell lysates was quantified using Chemi-ECL ELISA. A 4-PL model was used for the data fit and sample relative potency calculation. The method accuracy, linearity, repeatability, and intermediate precision were determined within the range of 50% to 200% of the labeled claim. A statistical equivalence of the two potency methods (CBPA and mLD₅₀) was initially demonstrated by comparing the AbbVie CBPA data with NIFDC mLD₅₀ data on a total of 167 commercial BOTOX lots (85 50U lots and 82 100U lots). In addition, six lots of onabotulinumtoxinA (three 50U and three 100U) were re-tested as cross-validation by these two methods for equivalence. (3) Results: The overall assay’s accuracy and intermediate precision were determined as 104% and 9.2%, and the slope, R-square, and Y-intercept for linearity were determined as 1.071, 0.998, and 0.036, respectively. The repeatability was determined as 6.9%. The range with the acceptable criteria of accuracy, linearity, and precision was demonstrated as 50% to 200% of the labeled claim. The 95% equivalence statistic test using margins [80%, 125%] indicates that CBPA and mLD₅₀ methods are equivalent for both BOTOX strengths (i.e., 50U and 100U). The relative potency data from cross-validation were within the range of ≥80% to ≤120%. (4) Conclusions: The CBPA meets all acceptance criteria and is equivalent to mLD₅₀. The replacement of mLD₅₀ with CBPA is well justified in terms of ensuring safety and efficacy, as well as for animal benefits.

Pertussis remains a leading cause of infant mortality globally, with rising cases in China post-COVID-19. Despite vaccination, waning immunity from acellular pertussis vaccines has driven resurgence. We evaluated a novel diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (acellular, three components) combined vaccine, adsorbed (DTcP), China's first genetically engineered three-component pertussis vaccine, administered under two primary schedules (2/3/4 vs. 2/4/6 months) compared to licensed DTaP-IPV-Hib (Pentaxim). In this randomized, blinded, phase III clinical trial, 1380 healthy 2-month-old infants from Henan, China, received DTcP-1 (2/3/4 months) or DTcP-2 (2/4/6 months) or DTaP-IPV-Hib (2/3/4 months). The primary safety endpoints were the incidence of adverse reactions within 0∼30 days after primary vaccination. The primary immunogenicity endpoints were to evaluate the non-inferiority and superiority of seroconversion rates and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of anti-pertussis toxoid (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), pertactin (PRN), diphtheria toxoid (DT), tetanus toxoid (TT), antibodies 30 days after primary vaccination. Immunogenicity was assessed via Luminex-based multiplex immunoassay. Both DTcP-1 and DTcP-2 schedules demonstrated non-inferior safety to DTaP-IPV-Hib (total adverse reactions: 14.52/16.59% vs. 16.91%, P = 0.183), with DTcP-2 (2/4/6 months) showing lower swelling (2.59% vs. 4.83%, P = 0.008) and irritability (0.07% vs. 1.02/1.40%, P < 0.001). DTcP-2 elicited higher GMCs against pertussis antigens (PT: 84.23 vs. 65.35; FHA: 132.16 vs. 102.13, both P < 0.001) and comparable DT/TT responses. DTcP exhibited favorable safety and superior pertussis immunogenicity, particularly with the 2/4/6-month schedule. Its genetically engineered three-component design offers a promising strategy to combat pertussis amid global resurgence.

Pertussis remains a significant global public health challenge, particularly in China, where no licensed pertussis-containing vaccines are available for individuals aged 6 years and older. This blind, randomised, and controlled phase I clinical trial evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the Tetanus, Reduced Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis (Five Components) Combined Vaccine, Adsorbed (Tdcp). Participants aged 6 years and above were divided into three age subgroups (6–11, 12–17, and ≥18 years) and randomised to receive Tdcp or control vaccines (PPV23 or DT). Safety endpoints included the incidence of adverse reactions within 30 days post-vaccination, while immunogenicity was assessed through seroconversion rates and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of anti-DT, TT, PT, FHA, PRN, and FIM 2&3 antibodies at 30 days post-vaccination. Among 178 participants, the incidence of total adverse reactions in the Tdcp group was 54.62%, primarily local reactions such as pain and itching, with no significant differences compared to controls (p > 0.05). Immunogenicity analysis revealed robust immune responses in the Tdcp groups, with seroconversion rates for pertussis-related antigens exceeding 75% in all age groups. The GMCs for anti-PT antibodies reached 125.60 IU/mL, 150.28 IU/mL, and 131.14 IU/mL in the ≥18 years, 12–17 years, and 6–11 years of Tdcp groups, respectively. Overall, the Tdcp vaccine demonstrated a good safety profile and robust immunogenicity in participants aged 6 years and above. The inclusion of five pertussis antigens, particularly PT, elicited strong immune responses, supporting its potential as an effective booster vaccine for adolescents and adults.Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT06056050.

Background: The three commercial Enterovirus 71 (EV71) inactivated vaccines which have effectively controlled the EV71 pandemic currently rely on inherent variable in vivo potency methods for batch release. To align with 3R (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) principles and enhance quality control, this study referred to WHO guidelines and the European Pharmacopoeia to develop in vitro relative potency (IVRP) methods. Methods: Working standards tracing to phase 3 clinical vaccines were established. Manufacture-specific IVRP methods were developed and validated per ICH Q14/Q2(R2), utilizing conformational epitope-targeting neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). One of the MAbs (CT11F9) recognition sites was clarified with Cryo-EM. Subsequently, the performance of IVRP was assessed using varied concentrations and heat-treated vaccines. The correlation between IVRP and in vivo methods was analyzed, followed by setting IVRP specifications. Results: The manufacturer-specific working standard exhibited ED50 values comparable to those of related phase 3 clinical vaccines. All IVRP methods achieved a relative bias/precision/total error ≤ 15%. The IVRP methods correlated with in vivo methods (p < 0.05, r > 0.9) can discriminate EV71 antigen concentrations (p < 0.01, r > 0.99) and indicate the stability of the vaccines. Cryo-EM was adopted to identify the epitopes recognized by CT11F9, revealing that this neutralizing antibody recognizes a conformational epitope spanning VP1-3 of the same protomer. Using 31–47 batches of commercial vaccines, IVRP specifications were proposed as 0.56–1.35, 0.58–1.40, and 0.54–1.50. Conclusions: Based on conformational epitope-targeting neutralizing MAbs, manufacturer-specific IVRP methods, which were sensitive to process variations and correlated with in vivo results, have been established. IVRP methods provide a reliable, animal-free alternative for EV71 vaccine batch release.

Background/Objectives: Enterovirus 71 (EV71) and coxsackieviruses A16 (CA16), A10 (CA10), and A6 (CA6) are the primary pathogens that cause hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). Currently, many manufacturers are developing bivalent, trivalent, and tetravalent vaccines that target these antigens. Cell-based neutralization assay (CBNA), the gold standard for detecting neutralizing antibodies (NtAbs), which are used as indicators of HFMD vaccine efficacy, has several limitations. We aimed to develop a novel assay for detecting NtAbs against a quadrivalent HFMD vaccine. Methods: We developed a four-color pseudovirus-based neutralization assay (PBNA), utilizing fluorescent reporter genes, to rapidly evaluate neutralizing antibodies against EV71, CA16, CA10, and CA6 in multivalent vaccines and compared it with CBNA. Results: PBNA could rapidly and simultaneously detect NtAbs against the four serotypes and required lesser amounts of sera compared to CBNA. A good consistency in determining NtAb titers was observed for PBNA and CBNA. Conclusions: PBNA provides a robust tool for evaluating the efficacy of multivalent HFMD vaccines and conducting seroepidemiological studies.

Enterovirus A71 (EVA71) is a major pathogen that causes hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). Although the symptoms of HFMD can be self-limiting, severe meningitis, encephalitis, myocarditis, and acute flaccid paralysis may occur. Upon EVA71 infection, the host cells deploy an intricate network of factors to orchestrate cellular responses and maintain cellular homeostasis. However, the virus has evolved various strategies to avoid unfavorable host restrictions and to establish a productive infection process. As response regimens are correlated with disease symptoms, exploring the interactions between the virus and host contributes to understanding the pathogenesis and underlying mechanisms of infection. In this review, we summarized the recent research progress related to pro-viral factors during EVA71 infection and discussed the underlying mechanisms employed by EVA71 to facilitate virion production. These insights may help identify antiviral therapeutic candidates and support vaccine development.