This paper aims to introduce a standardized test methodology for drone detection, tracking, and identification systems. It is the aim that this standardized test methodology for assessing the performance of counter-drone systems will lead to a much better understanding of the capabilities of these solutions. This is urgently needed, as there is an increase in drone threats and there are no cohesive policies to evaluate the performance of these systems and hence mitigate and manage the threat. The presented methodology has been developed within the framework of the project COURAGEOUS funded by European Union’s Internal Security Fund Police. This standardized test methodology is based upon a series of standard user-defined scenarios representing a wide set of use cases. At this moment, these standard scenarios are geared toward civil security end users. However, the proposed standard methodology provides an open architecture where the standard scenarios can be modularly extended, providing standard users the possibility to easily add new scenarios. For each of these scenarios, operational needs and functional performance requirements are provided. Using this information, an integral test methodology is presented that allows for a fair qualitative and quantitative comparison between different counter-drone systems. The standard test methodology concentrates on the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of counter-drone systems. This test methodology was validated during three user-scripted validation trials.

This paper aims to introduce a standardized test methodology for drone detection, tracking and identification systems. It is the aim that this standardized test methodology for assessing the performance of counter-drone systems will lead to a much better understanding of the capabilities of these solutions. This is urgently needed, as there is an increase in drone threats and there are no cohesive policies to evaluate the performance of these systems and hence mitigate and manage the threat. The presented methodology has been developed within the framework of the project COURAGEOUS funded by European Union’s Internal Security Fund Police. This standardized test methodology is based upon a series of standard user-defined scenarios representing a wide set of use cases. At this moment, these standard scenarios are geared towards civil security end users. However, the proposed standard methodology provides an open architecture where the standard scenarios can modularly be extended, providing the standard users the possibility to easily add new scenarios. For each of these scenarios, operational needs and functional performance requirements are provided. Using this information, an integral test methodology is presented that allows for a fair qualitative and quantitative comparison between different counter-drone systems. The standard test methodology concentrates on the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of counter-drone systems. This test methodology was validated during three user-scripted validation trials.

The increasing need to reduce reliance on fossil-derived aviation fuels and mitigate environmental impacts has intensified research into renewable alternatives for aviation energy systems. The growing interest in ethanol-based fuels is primarily driven by their simple oxygen-rich molecular structure and advantageous physicochemical characteristics, yet experimental studies examining their application in hybrid power architectures, including micro-turboprop engine-based power sources, are still limited. This study presents an experimental investigation of ethanol–Jet A1 fuel blends used in a micro-turboprop engine operating as a power generation unit for unmanned aerial vehicle applications. Ethanol was blended with Jet A1 at volumetric fractions of 10%, 20% and 30% and the engine was tested under multiple operating regimes corresponding to different electrical power outputs. Exhaust gas temperature, electrical power output and gaseous emissions (CO and NO_x) were measured for each operating condition. The results indicate that low ethanol fractions (E10) provide performance comparable to neat kerosene, while higher ethanol fractions lead to a reduction in exhaust gas temperature at low-power regimes due to the lower heating value and high latent heat of vaporization of ethanol. Emission measurements showed a decrease in NO_x emissions with increasing ethanol content, associated with lower combustion temperatures, while CO emissions increased at low-power regimes due to incomplete combustion under lean conditions. Additionally, combustion instability was observed during rapid transitions from maximum to idle regime operation for higher ethanol blends, attributed to transient ultra-lean mixtures, evaporative cooling, and reduced reaction rates. The results demonstrate that ethanol–kerosene blends can be used in micro-turboprop systems at low blend ratios without major performance penalties, but transient operating conditions impose stability limits that must be considered in practical UAV power system applications.

The transition toward sustainable aviation fuels for unmanned aerial vehicle propulsion requires alternative fuel blends that reduce emissions while maintaining stable power generation. This study investigates the combustion performance, electrical output, emission behavior, and near-field pollutant dispersion of butanol–kerosene blends in a hybrid micro-turboprop propulsion platform representative of UAV applications. Conventional kerosene and three butanol–kerosene blends, containing 10%, 20%, and 30% butanol by volume, were tested under four operating regimes ranging from idle to approximately 2.5 kW electrical load. Exhaust gas temperature, CO, NO, NOx, SO₂, electrical power output, throttle response, and pollutant dispersion behavior were evaluated experimentally, while polynomial regression was applied to quantify throttle–power relationships. The results show that the 20% butanol blend provided the most favorable overall performance. Relative to conventional kerosene, B20 achieved approximately 4.8% higher electrical power output at equivalent throttle settings, reduced fuel demand by nearly 3.9%, and decreased the throttle requirement for 2 kW electrical output by almost 5%. In terms of emissions, B20 reduced CO formation across low and intermediate operating regimes while maintaining moderate NOx levels and stable exhaust gas temperature behavior. Increasing butanol content also improved plume homogenization: the anisotropy index decreased from 2.41 for B10 to 1.96 for B20 and 1.58 for B30, while high-concentration plume regions were reduced by up to 31%. However, B30 introduced stronger evaporative cooling, ignition delay effects, and reduced mid-load responsiveness. Overall, moderate butanol blending, particularly B20, represents the most balanced solution for reducing the environmental footprint of hybrid UAV micro-turboprop propulsion without significant performance penalties.

The development of low-emission and reliable propulsion systems is essential for extending the operational capability of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Although aviation decarbonization is widely recognized as an important objective, it must be considered within the broader context of limited renewable-energy availability. Recent system-level analyses of transportation decarbonization have shown that the allocation of renewable electricity and sustainable fuels should prioritize sectors where direct electrification is most efficient, while hard-to-electrify sectors require alternative pathways. Aviation is one of the most difficult transport sectors to electrify because of strict energy-density requirements, especially for long-endurance airborne platforms. Therefore, sustainable liquid fuels and hybrid propulsion systems should not be considered universal replacements for electrification, but rather complementary solutions for applications where batteries alone cannot provide the required endurance, payload capacity or operational flexibility. In this context, the present study focuses on alcohol–kerosene blends for hybrid UAV power systems, where liquid-fuel energy density and partial emission reduction remain relevant engineering requirements. This work provides one of the first systematic experimental evaluations of ethanol–, butanol– and octanol–kerosene blends in a micro-turboprop engine operating as part of a hybrid UAV power-generation architecture. Unlike previous studies focused mainly on micro-turbojet thrust response, the present work evaluates the coupled influence of alcohol chain length and blending ratio on exhaust gas temperature, gaseous emissions, electrical output and operational stability under multi-load conditions representative of UAV operation. Jet-A and nine alcohol–kerosene blends containing 10%, 20% and 30% ethanol, butanol or octanol by volume were tested over four operating regimes, from idle to 2500 W electrical load. The results show that ethanol blends provided the strongest CO reduction, with E30 reducing CO by 24.9% relative to Jet-A under R3, while E10 offered the most balanced behavior across the full operating range. Higher ethanol fractions improved CO suppression but introduced NOx and low-load stability penalties. Octanol blends, particularly O20, exhibited the most kerosene-like and stable response, supporting reliable power delivery with reduced operational variability. Butanol blends showed intermediate behavior without providing a dominant advantage. A multi-criteria evaluation combining emissions, EGT behavior, relative performance, operational stability and cost identified E10 as the best overall compromise for hybrid UAV use. The study demonstrates that alcohol chain length produces nonlinear system-level effects in hybrid micro-turboprop architectures and provides an experimental basis for fuel selection in low-emission UAV power systems.