Background: Since the onset of COVID-19, public health policies and public opinions changed from stringent preventive measures against spread of COVID-19 to policies accommodating life with continued, diminished risk for contracting COVID-19. Poland is a country that demonstrated severe psychological impact and negative mental health. The study aims to examine psychological impact and changes in levels of depression, anxiety, and stress among three cross-sectional samples of Polish people and COVID-19-related factors associated with adverse mental health. Methods: In total, 2324 Polish persons participated in repeated cross-sectional studies across three surveys: Survey 1 (22 to 26 March 2020), Survey 2 (21 October to 3 December 2020), and Survey 3 (3 November to 10 December 2021). Participants completed an online survey, including Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21), demographics, knowledge, and concerns of COVID-19 and precautionary measures. Results: A significant reduction of IES-R scores was seen across surveys, while DASS-21 scores were significantly higher in Survey 2. There was significant reduction in the frequency of following COVID-19 news, recent COVID-19 testing, and home isolation from Survey 1 to 3. Being emale was significantly associated with higher IES-R and DASS-21 scores in Surveys 1 and 2. Student status was significantly associated with higher DASS-21 across surveys. Chills, myalgia, and fatigue were significantly associated with high IES-R or DASS-21 scores across surveys. Frequency of wearing masks and perception that mask could reduce risk of COVID-19 were significantly associated with higher IES-R and DASS-21 scores. Conclusion: Conclusions: The aforementioned findings indicate a reduction in the level of the measured subjective distress andin the frequency of checking COVID-19 news-related information across three periods during the pandemic in Poland.

Background: Clinical practice suggests that objective assessment tools are needed to assess adults with inattention or hyperactivity, informed by the underlying pathophysiology of attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This systematic review comprehensively evaluates the current objective assessment methods as an adjunct diagnostic tool for these adults. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies investigating various objective diagnostic methods to assess adults with ADHD and healthy controls. The database search occurred from its inception to 23 December 2024. Results: Our search yielded 46 studies that reported on various objective methods to assess adults with ADHD. The MOXO-distracted Continuous Performance Test (MOXO-d-CPT), eye-tracker with MOXO-d CPT, Conners’ Continuous Performance Test—3rd edition (CCPT-3), and oculomotricity can differentiate between true and feigned ADHD or other diagnostic possibilities. The Quantified Behavior Test (Qb Test+) can detect hyperactivity and differentiate it from other psychiatric disorders. Mono-d, CCPT-3, Qb Test+, Test of Variables and Attention (TOVA), Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test (IVA-CPT), and oculomotricity can monitor pharmacotherapy response. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) offers more promise than structural imaging and demonstrates a moderate level of sensitivity and specificity to differentiate adults with and without ADHD by performing the verbal fluency test. Notwithstanding, electroencephalography (EEG)/event-related potential (ERP) shows potential in diagnosis and treatment monitoring (e.g., neurofeedback training). In addition, transcriptome-based biomarkers have also been explored as diagnostic tools. Conclusion: The diagnosis and monitoring of ADHD in adults come with a unique set of challenges due to psychiatric comorbidity, including depression and anxiety; fluctuation of symptoms over time; and lack of consensus among clinicians and professional organizations to adopt objective tests in the diagnostic process. Our findings support the notion that a combination of clinical assessment and objective biomarkers targeting distinct pathophysiological aspects may enhance the accuracy of ADHD diagnosis.