Marie-Christine ETIENNE-GRIMALDI

Dr. Marie-Christine ETIENNE-GRIMALDI

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 September 2011 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CDCoralie Dorard
Coralie Dorard
ATAurélie de Thonel
Aurélie de Thonel
ACAda Collura
Ada Collura
LMLaetitia Marisa
Laetitia Marisa
MSMagali Svrcek
Magali Svrcek
ADAlex Duval
Alex Duval

1 April 2018 in Bulletin du Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MLMarie-Anne Loriot
Marie-Anne Loriot
Joseph CiccoliniJoseph Ciccolini
Joseph Ciccolini
FTFabienne Thomas
Fabienne Thomas
CBchantal barin
chantal barin
BRBernard Royer
Bernard Royer
MEMarie-Christine ETIENNE-GRIMALDI
Marie-Christine ETIENNE-GRIMALDI
Fluoropyrimidines (FU) are still the most prescribed anticancer drugs for the treatment of solid cancers. However, fluoropyrimidines cause severe toxicities in 10 to 40% of patients and toxic deaths in 0.2 to 0.8% of patients, resulting in a real public health problem. The main origin of FU-related toxicities is a deficiency of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the rate-limiting enzyme of 5-FU catabolism. DPD deficiency may be identified through pharmacogenetics testing including phenotyping (direct or indirect measurement of enzyme activity) or genotyping (detection of inactivating polymorphisms on the DPYD gene). Approximately 3 to 15% of patients exhibit a partial deficiency and 0.1 to 0.5% a complete DPD deficiency. Currently, there is no regulatory obligation for DPD deficiency screening in patients scheduled to receive a fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. Based on the levels of evidence from the literature data and considering current French practices, the Group of Clinical Pharmacology in Oncology (GPCO)-UNICANCER and the French Network of Pharmacogenetics (RNPGx) recommend the following: (1) to screen DPD deficiency before initiating any chemotherapy containing 5-FU or capecitabine; (2) to perform DPD phenotyping by measuring plasma uracil (U) concentrations (possibly associated with dihydrouracil/U ratio), and DPYD genotyping (variants *2A, *13, p.D949V, HapB3); (3) to reduce the initial FU dose (first cycle) according to DPD status, if needed, and further, to consider increasing the dose at subsequent cycles according to treatment tolerance. In France, 17 public laboratories currently undertake routine screening of DPD deficiency.

1 January 2020 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBchantal barin
chantal barin
CLClaire Lafay-Chebassier
Claire Lafay-Chebassier
IIIsabelle Ingrand
Isabelle Ingrand
JTJean-François Tournamille
Jean-François Tournamille
ABAdeline Boudet
Adeline Boudet
MEMarie-Christine ETIENNE-GRIMALDI
Marie-Christine ETIENNE-GRIMALDI

1 April 2017 in Oral Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBDelphine Borchiellini
Delphine Borchiellini
MEMarie-Christine ETIENNE-GRIMALDI
Marie-Christine ETIENNE-GRIMALDI
RBRené-Jean BENSADOUN
René-Jean BENSADOUN
KBK. Benezery
K. Benezery
ODO. Dassonville
O. Dassonville
GMGérard Milano
Gérard Milano

4 April 2014 in Nucleosides, Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Godefridus J. PetersGodefridus J. Peters
Godefridus J. Peters
RHRichard Honeywell
Richard Honeywell
MMMarie Maulandi
Marie Maulandi
Elisa GiovannettiElisa Giovannetti
Elisa Giovannetti
NLNienke Losekoot
Nienke Losekoot
FGfor the EORTC-Pharmacology and Molecular Mechanism Group
for the EORTC-Pharmacology and Molecular Mechanism Group
Cytidine deaminase (CDA) plays a crucial role in the degradation of cytidine analogs, such as gemcitabine and cytarabine. Several studies showed that a low CDA activity is associated with more toxicity but a higher efficacy, while a high activity will lead to a lower efficacy but less toxicity. A stratified dosing strategy based on the relative CDA activity would increase efficiency. In order to predict these events, a reliable measurement of CDA with a validated method is crucial. We aimed to determine which phenotype assay would be most suitable; a spectrophotometric assay using cytidine as a substrate, or an HPLC assay using gemcitabine as a substrate. In serum and whole blood of 26 volunteers, both assays showed an excellent correlation (R > 0.999), but not in plasma nor in red blood cells. Moreover, there was no difference between males and females. In conclusion, the spectrophotometric assay seems the most simple and cost-effective test. It should be performed in serum, while it should be normalized on protein content as measured by the Bicinchoninic Acid.

23 November 2020 in Pharmaceuticals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJocelyn Gal
Jocelyn Gal
GMGérard Milano
Gérard Milano
PBPatrick Brest
Patrick Brest
NENathalie EBRAN
Nathalie EBRAN
JGJulia Gilhodes
Julia Gilhodes
JPJean-Yves Pierga
Jean-Yves Pierga
The prospective multicenter COMET trial followed a cohort of 306 consecutive metastatic breast cancer patients receiving bevacizumab and paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy. This study was intended to identify and validate reliable biomarkers to better predict bevacizumab treatment outcomes and allow for a more personalized use of this antiangiogenic agent. To that end, we aimed to establish risk scores for survival prognosis dichotomization based on classic clinico-pathological criteria combined or not with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The genomic DNA of 306 patients was extracted and a panel of 13 SNPs, covering seven genes previously documented to be potentially involved in drug response, were analyzed by means of high-throughput genotyping. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, the hazard model based on a triple-negative cancer phenotype variable, combined with specific SNPs in VEGFA (rs833061), VEGFR1 (rs9582036) and VEGFR2 (rs1870377), had the highest predictive value. The overall survival hazard ratio of patients assigned to the poor prognosis group based on this model was 3.21 (95% CI (2.33–4.42); p < 0.001). We propose that combining this pharmacogenetic approach with classical clinico-pathological characteristics could markedly improve clinical decision-making for breast cancer patients receiving bevacizumab-based therapy.