Eric Lindsey

Dr. Eric Lindsey

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 September 2015 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JGJ Galetzka
J Galetzka
DMD Melgar
D Melgar
JGJ F Genrich
J F Genrich
Jianghui GengJianghui Geng
Jianghui Geng
SOS Owen
S Owen
NMN Maharjan
N Maharjan
The bigger they are, the harder they fall: The magnitude 7.8 Gorkha earthquake hit Nepal on 25 April 2015. The earthquake killed thousands and caused great damage. Galetzka et al. determined how the fault that caused this earthquake ruptured. The rupture showed a smooth slip pulse 20 km wide that moved eastward along the fault over about 6 s. The nature of the rupture limited damage to regular dwellings but generated shaking that collapsed taller structures. Science , this issue p. 1091

9 August 2015 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ELEric Lindsey
Eric Lindsey
Ryo NatsuakiRyo Natsuaki
Ryo Natsuaki
XXXiaohua Xu
Xiaohua Xu
MSMasanobu Shimada
Masanobu Shimada
MHManabu Hashimoto
Manabu Hashimoto
DSDavid T. Sandwell
David T. Sandwell
Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) is a key tool for the analysis of displacement and stress changes caused by large crustal earthquakes, particularly in remote areas. A challenge for traditional InSAR has been its limited spatial and temporal coverage especially for very large events, whose dimensions exceed the typical swath width of 70–100 km. This problem is addressed by the ALOS‐2 satellite, whose PALSAR‐2 instrument operates in ScanSAR mode, enabling a repeat time of 2 weeks and a swath width of 350 km. Here we present InSAR line‐of‐sight displacement data from ALOS‐2/PALSAR‐2 observations covering the Mw 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal earthquake and its Mw 7.3 aftershock that were acquired within 1 week of each event. The data are made freely available and we encourage their use in models of the fault slip and associated stress changes. The Mw 7.3 aftershock not only extended the rupture area of the main shock toward the east but also left a 20 km gap where the fault has little or no coseismic slip. We estimate this unslipped fault patch has the potential to generate a Mw 6.9 event.

12 September 2022 in Nature Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CTCheryl Tay
Cheryl Tay
ELEric Lindsey
Eric Lindsey
SCShi Tong Chin
Shi Tong Chin
JMJamie W. McCaughey
Jamie W. McCaughey
DBDavid Bekaert
David Bekaert
EHEmma L. Hill
Emma L. Hill

4 February 2013 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ELEric Lindsey
Eric Lindsey
YFY. Fialko
Y. Fialko

25 March 2019 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RMRishav Mallick
Rishav Mallick
ELEric Lindsey
Eric Lindsey
LFLujia Feng
Lujia Feng
JHJudith Hubbard
Judith Hubbard
PBParamesh Banerjee
Paramesh Banerjee
EHEmma L. Hill
Emma L. Hill
The Rakhine (Arakan)‐Bangladesh megathrust, along which the Indian and Burma plates collide, is assumed by some to be inactive/aseismic due to the lack of notable interplate earthquakes in the modern instrumental catalog. However, geological and historical evidence of the great 1762 Arakan earthquake suggest the megathrust can produce M~8 events that could adversely affect the lives of millions of people in the region. To investigate the seismogenic potential and determine the slip budget of the megathrust, we first need to solve for India‐Burma‐Sunda relative plate motions. We present a new set of 24 GPS velocities (2011–2017) from the Myanmar‐India‐Bangladesh‐Bhutan continuous GPS network. We use the new velocities and those from previously published studies to explore the geometries and slip rates of three major faults (Rakhine‐Bangladesh megathrust, Churachandpur‐Mao Fault, and Sagaing Fault) that accommodate the India‐Burma‐Sunda plate motion. Our results suggest that the three major faults we studied are likely fully coupled; the modern shortening rate across the Burma plate is 12–24 mm/year, while the total dextral shear rate is 25–32 mm/year. The possibly fully coupled shallow megathrust, and splay faults that may sole into it, are geodetically invisible while they are not slipping. However, we can identify the transition from coupling to steady creep on the deeper extension of the megathrust; we use this to show active oblique India‐Burma convergence and to map along‐strike and along‐dip variations in dip‐slip and strike‐slip motion. This implies that the megathrust is currently accumulating strain which will eventually be released in earthquakes.

18 September 2014 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ELEric Lindsey
Eric Lindsey
YFYuri Fialko
Yuri Fialko
YBYehuda Bock
Yehuda Bock
DSDavid T. Sandwell
David T. Sandwell
RBRoger Bilham
Roger Bilham
We investigate the spatial pattern of surface creep and off‐fault deformation along the southern segment of the San Andreas Fault using a combination of multiple interferometric synthetic aperture radar viewing geometries and survey‐mode GPS occupations of a dense array crossing the fault. Radar observations from Envisat during the period 2003–2010 were used to separate the pattern of horizontal and vertical motion, providing a high‐resolution image of uplift and shallow creep along the fault trace. The data reveal pervasive shallow creep along the southernmost 50 km of the fault. Creep is localized on a well‐defined fault trace only in the Mecca Hills and Durmid Hill areas, while elsewhere creep appears to be distributed over a 1–2 km wide zone surrounding the fault. The degree of strain localization is correlated with variations in the local fault strike. Using a two‐dimensional boundary element model, we show that stresses resulting from slip on a curved fault can promote or inhibit inelastic failure within the fault zone in a pattern matching the observations. The occurrence of shallow, localized interseismic fault creep within mature fault zones may thus be partly controlled by the local fault geometry and normal stress, with implications for models of fault zone evolution, shallow coseismic slip deficit, and geologic estimates of long‐term slip rates.