Alessandro Pardolesi

Dr. Alessandro Pardolesi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 July 2017 in Journal of Visualized Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSStefano Sanna
Stefano Sanna
JBJury Brandolini
Jury Brandolini
APAlessandro Pardolesi
Alessandro Pardolesi
DADesideria Argnani
Desideria Argnani
MMMarta Mengozzi
Marta Mengozzi
PSPiergiorgio Solli
Piergiorgio Solli
Extensive chest wall resection and reconstruction are a challenging procedure that requires a multidisciplinary approach, including input from thoracic surgeon, plastic surgeon and oncologist. In particular chest wall neoplastic pathology is associated with high surgical morbidity and can result in full thickness defects hard to reconstruct. The goals of a successful chest wall reconstruction are to restore the chest wall rigidity, preserve pulmonary mechanic and protect the intrathoracic organs minimizing the thoracic deformity. In case of large full thickness defects synthetic, biologic or composite meshes can be used, with or without titanium plate to restore thoracic cage rigidity as like as more recently the use of allograft to reconstruct the sternum. After skeletal stability is established full tissue coverage can be achieved using direct suture, skin graft or local advancement flaps, pedicled myocutaneous flaps or free flaps. The aim of this article is to illustrate the indications, various materials and techniques for chest wall reconstruction with the goal to obtain the best chest wall rigidity and soft tissue coverage.

1 September 2012 in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAlessandro Pardolesi
Alessandro Pardolesi
BPBernard Park
Bernard Park
Francesco PetrellaFrancesco Petrella
Francesco Petrella
ABAlessandro Borri
Alessandro Borri
Roberto GasparriRoberto Gasparri
Roberto Gasparri
GVGiulia Veronesi
Giulia Veronesi

5 May 2019 in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Luca BertolacciniLuca Bertolaccini
Luca Bertolaccini
HBHasan Batirel
Hasan Batirel
ABAlessandro Brunelli
Alessandro Brunelli
DGDiego Gonzalez-Rivas
Diego Gonzalez-Rivas
MIMahmoud Ismail
Mahmoud Ismail
Gaetano RoccoGaetano Rocco
Gaetano Rocco
OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to report the results of the first consensus paper among international experts in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UniVATS) lobectomy obtained through a Delphi process, the objective of which was to define and standardize the main procedural steps, optimize its indications and perioperative management and identify elements to assist in future training. METHODS: The 40 members of the working group were convened and organized on a voluntary basis by the Uniportal VATS Interest Group (UVIG) of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). An e-consensus finding exercise using the Delphi method was applied to require 75% agreement for reaching consensus on each question. Repeated iterations of anonymous voting continued for 3 rounds. RESULTS: Overall, 31 international experts from 18 countries completed all 3 rounds of questionnaires. Although a technical quorum was not achieved, most of the responders agreed that the maximum size of a UniVATS incision should be ≤4 cm. Agreement was reached on many points outlining the currently accepted definition of a UniVATS lobectomy, its indications and contraindications, perioperative clinical management and recommendations for training and future research directions. CONCLUSIONS: The UVIG Consensus Report stated that UniVATS offers a valid alternative to standard VATS techniques. Only longer follow-up and randomized controlled studies will predict whether UniVATS represents a valid alternative approach to multiport VATS for major lung resections or whether it should be performed only in selected cases and by selected centres. The next step for the ESTS UVIG is the establishment of a UniVATS section inside the ESTS databases.

20 December 2019 in Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Paolo MendogniPaolo Mendogni
Paolo Mendogni
JVJacopo Vannucci
Jacopo Vannucci
MGMarco Ghisalberti
Marco Ghisalberti
MAMarco Anile
Marco Anile
Beatrice AraminiBeatrice Aramini
Beatrice Aramini
EREmanuele Russo
Emanuele Russo
Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is one of the most common thoracic diseases affecting adolescents and young adults. Despite the high incidence of PSP and the availability of several international guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment, a significant behavioural heterogeneity can be found among those management recommendations. A working group of the Italian Society of Thoracic Surgery summarized the best evidence available on PSP management with the methodological tool of a systematic review assessing the quality of previously published guidelines with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II. Concerning PSP physiopathology, the literature seems to be equally divided between those who support the hypothesis of a direct correlation between changes in atmospheric pressure and temperature and the incidence of PSP, so it is not currently possible to confirm or reject this theory with reasonable certainty. Regarding the choice between conservative treatment and chest drainage in the first episode, there is no evidence on whether one option is superior to the other. Video-assisted thoracic surgery represents the most common and preferred surgical approach. A primary surgical approach to patients with their first PSP seems to guarantee a lower recurrence rate than that of a primary approach consisting of a chest drainage positioning; conversely, the percentage of futile surgical interventions that would entail this aggressive attitude must be carefully evaluated. Surgical pleurodesis is recommended and frequently performed to limit recurrences; talc poudrage offers efficient pleurodesis, but a considerable number of surgeons are concerned about administering this inert material to young patients. Clinical trial registration number: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42018084247.

1 January 2018 in Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAntonio Mazzella
Antonio Mazzella
APAlessandro Pardolesi
Alessandro Pardolesi
PMPatrick Maisonneuve
Patrick Maisonneuve
FPFrancesco Petrella
Francesco Petrella
DGDomenico Galetta
Domenico Galetta
LSLorenzo Spaggiari
Lorenzo Spaggiari

1 April 2017 in Journal of Thoracic Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Luca BertolacciniLuca Bertolaccini
Luca Bertolaccini
PSPiergiorgio Solli
Piergiorgio Solli
APAlessandro Pardolesi
Alessandro Pardolesi
Antonello PasiniAntonello Pasini
Antonello Pasini
The artificial neural networks (ANNs) are statistical models where the mathematical structure reproduces the biological organisation of neural cells simulating the learning dynamics of the brain. Although definitions of the term ANN could vary, the term usually refers to a neural network used for non-linear statistical data modelling. The neural models applied today in various fields of medicine, such as oncology, do not aim to be biologically realistic in detail but just efficient models for nonlinear regression or classification. ANN inference has applications in tasks that require attention focusing. ANNs also have a niche to carve in clinical decision support, but their success depends crucially on better integration with clinical protocols, together with an awareness of the need to combine different paradigms to produce the simplest and most transparent overall reasoning structure, and the will to evaluate this in a real clinical environment. We have performed an assessment of the evidence for improvements in the use of ANN in lung cancer research. Our analysis showed that often the use of ANN in the medical literature had not been performed in an accurate manner. A strict cooperation between physician and biostatisticians could be helpful in determine and resolve these errors.