Background: Current standard practice for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) entails a multidisciplinary approach that includes preoperative chemoradiotherapy, followed by total mesorectal excision, and then adjuvant chemotherapy. The latter has been accompanied by low compliance rates and no survival benefit in phase III randomized trials, so the strategy of administering neoadjuvant, rather than adjuvant, chemotherapy has been adapted by many trials, with improvement in pathologic complete response. Induction chemotherapy with oxaliplatin has been shown to have increased efficacy in rectal cancer, while short-course radiation therapy with consolidation chemotherapy increased short-term overall survival rate and decreased toxicity levels, making it cheaper and more convenient than long-course radiation therapy. This led to recognition of total neoadjuvant therapy as a valid treatment approach in many guidelines despite limited available survival data. With the upregulation (PDL-1) expression in rectal tumors after radiotherapy and the increased use of in malignant melanoma, the novel approach of combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy after radiation may have a role in further increasing pCR and improving overall outcomes in rectal cancer. Methods: The study is an open label single arm multi- center phase II trial. Forty-four recruited LARC patients will receive 5Gy x 5fractions of SCRT, followed by 6 cycles of mFOLFOX-6 plus avelumab, before TME is performed. The hypothesis is that the addition of avelumab to mFOLFOX-6, administered following SCRT, will improve pCR and overall outcomes. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of patients who achieve a pCR, defined as no viable tumor cells on the excised specimen. Secondary objectives are to evaluate 3-year progression-free survival, tumor response to treatment (tumor regression grades 0 & 1), density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, correlation of baseline Immunoscore with pCR rates and changes in PD-L1 expression. Discussion: Recent studies show an increase in PD-L1 expression and density of CD8+ TILs after CRT in rectal cancer patients, implying a potential role for combinatory strategies using PD-L1- and programmed-death- 1 inhibiting drugs. We aim through this study to evaluate pCR following SCRT, followed by mFOLFOX-6 with avelumab, and then TME procedure in patients with LARC. Trial registration: Trial Registration Number and Date of Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03503630, April 20, 2018.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Classically, liver transplantation (LT) can be curative for HCC tumors within the Milan criteria. Bridging strategies to reduce the dropouts from LT waiting lists and/or to downstage patients who are beyond the Milan criteria are widely utilized. We conducted a literature-based review to evaluate the role of systemic therapies as a bridging treatment to liver transplantation (LT) in HCC patients. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can be used as a systemic bridging therapy to LT in patients with contraindications for locoregional liver-directed therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment can be utilized either as a monotherapy or as a combination therapy with bevacizumab or TKIs prior to LT. Acute rejection after liver transplantation is a concern in the context of ICI treatment. Thus, a safe ICI washout period before LT and cautious post-LT immunosuppression strategies are required to reduce post-LT rejections and to optimize clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, prospective clinical trials are needed to establish definitive conclusions about the utility of systemic therapy as a bridging modality prior to LT in HCC patients.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Classically, liver transplantation (LT) can be curable for HCC tumors within the Milan criteria. Bridging strategies to reduce the dropouts from LT waiting lists or/and to downstage patients who are beyond Milan criteria are widely utilized. We conducted a literature-based review to evaluate the role of systemic therapies as a bridging treatment to liver transplantation (LT) in HCC patients. Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) can be used as a bridging systemic therapy to LT in patients with contraindication to locoregional liver-directed therapies. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) treatment can be utilized either as a monotherapy or as a combination therapy with Bevacizumab or TKIs prior to LT. Acute rejection post liver transplantation is a concern in the context of ICIs treatment. Thus, a safe ICI washout period before LT and cautious post-LT immunosuppression strategies are required to reduce post-LT rejections and to optimize clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, prospective clinical trials are needed to establish definitive conclusions about the utility of systemic therapy as a bridging modality prior to LT in HCC patients.

Background/Objectives: Predictive tools are needed to assess the response to treatment and guide treatment decisions for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This study explores the value of combining the immunoscore (IS) and magnetic resonance imaging tumor regression grade (mrTRG) with pathologic and radiologic neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) scores in predicting pathologic complete response (pCRs). Methods: The scores were assessed for patients with LARC enrolled in the Averectal study (NCT03503630), who received five fractions of short-course radiotherapy, followed by six cycles of mFOLFOX-6 plus avelumab, and total mesorectal excision. The IS was calculated using the mean density percentiles of CD3- and CD8-positive T-cells on baseline biopsy samples. Baseline and post-treatment MRIs were reviewed to measure the mrTRG. NAR scores were calculated using the pre-treatment T stage and post-treatment pathologic and radiologic N and T stages. Results: Fifteen out of thirty-five patients whose data were available achieved pCR (42.8%), and seven out of fourteen patients with mrTRG = 1 (complete response) attained pCR. In patients with both a mrTRG = 1 and high IS, the pCR rate was 66.7% (6/9). All of the patients who achieved pCR had a low or intermediate pathologic NAR score with a significant correlation between pCR and pathologic NAR scores (p < 0.0001). Both pathologic and radiologic NAR scores were correlated with overall survival and disease-free survival. Conclusions: The IS can supplement the mrTRG to better predict TNT outcomes, along with the use of the NAR score. This combination could potentially help with patient selection for non-operative management and guide treatment strategies for those with different recurrence risks.

Background Defunctioning stomas are standard in low anterior resection (LAR) posttotal neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) to mitigate anastomotic complications. While loop ileostomy is common, it poses significant metabolic risks. This study investigates whether loop colostomy may reduce renal and electrolyte complications, without compromising surgical or stoma reversal outcomes. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 97 patients with rectal cancer treated at King Hussein Cancer Center (January 2020 to November 2024) who underwent TNT followed by LAR with a defunctioning stoma (ileostomy, n = 57; colostomy, n = 40). Primary outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI) and hyponatremia. Secondary outcomes included stoma-related and closure-related complications. Data were compared using chi-squared, Mann–Whitney U-test, and Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable, except for higher baseline creatinine in ileostomy patients (p = 0.002). Ileostomy was associated with more AKI (35.1% versus 2.5%, p < 0.001) and hyponatremia (57.8% versus 20.0%, p < 0.001) with greater stoma output (p < 0.001). Skin excoriation was more frequent with ileostomy (24.5% versus 5.0%, p = 0.011), while colostomy had higher stoma prolapse (22.5% versus 1.7%, p < 0.001). Other postoperative outcomes were similar. However, blood loss during stoma reversal was greater with ileostomy (p < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no difference in time to closure (median 84 versus 85 days, p = 0.491). In multivariate analysis, ileostomy remained associated with AKI and hyponatremia after adjustment for the included covariates. Conclusions Loop colostomy may represent an alternative to loop ileostomy after LAR following TNT, with fewer metabolic complications and comparable surgical outcomes, despite a higher prolapse risk.