Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Classically, liver transplantation (LT) can be curative for HCC tumors within the Milan criteria. Bridging strategies to reduce the dropouts from LT waiting lists and/or to downstage patients who are beyond the Milan criteria are widely utilized. We conducted a literature-based review to evaluate the role of systemic therapies as a bridging treatment to liver transplantation (LT) in HCC patients. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can be used as a systemic bridging therapy to LT in patients with contraindications for locoregional liver-directed therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment can be utilized either as a monotherapy or as a combination therapy with bevacizumab or TKIs prior to LT. Acute rejection after liver transplantation is a concern in the context of ICI treatment. Thus, a safe ICI washout period before LT and cautious post-LT immunosuppression strategies are required to reduce post-LT rejections and to optimize clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, prospective clinical trials are needed to establish definitive conclusions about the utility of systemic therapy as a bridging modality prior to LT in HCC patients.

Background: CIC-rearranged sarcoma is a rare and aggressive type of undifferentiated round cell tumor characterized by CIC gene fusion, most commonly CIC::DUX4. This study presents a series of eleven cases, highlighting their clinicopathological features. Methods: Pathology records (2019 to 2024) were searched using “sarcoma with CIC”, identifying eleven cases, of which seven referred cases were initially misdiagnosed. Pathological and clinical analysis was conducted. Treatment was dictated upon multidisciplinary panel discussion based on tumor stage. Follow-up data (1–25 months) was available for all patients. Results: The cohort included six males and five females, with a median age of 43 years (range;14–53), with nine in soft tissue and two in bone. Tumor size ranged from 3.5 cm to 20.0 cm (mean: 9.8 cm). Most cases showed sheets of undifferentiated round- to oval-shaped cells. Two cases showed an Ewing-like pattern, and one case showed spindle cells in a fibrotic stroma transitioning to epithelioid cells. Necrosis was present in nine cases, and mitotic count ranged from 2 to 38/ 10HPFs (mean = 14.2). CD99 was positive in (10/11) cases and WT-1 in (6/9). NKX2.2, S100, and MDM2 were positive in rare cases. CIC::DUX4 fusion was detected in four cases. FISH for CIC gene rearrangement was positive in seven cases, two of them confirmed by methylation analysis. Metastasis at diagnosis was common (n = 8), primarily in the lungs, with later metastasis to the brain and bone. At time of final analysis, eight patients died within a median of 10 months (range: 1–19 months), while three were alive, two with stable disease (for a period of 6 and 25 months) and one with progression after 10 months. Significant correlation was seen between overall survival and the presence of metastasis at diagnosis (p value = 0.03). Conclusions: CIC-rearranged sarcomas are rare, high-grade tumors with predilection for soft tissue. Misdiagnosis is frequent, necessitating molecular confirmation. These tumors are treatment-resistant, often present with lung metastasis, and carry a poor prognosis, especially with initial metastasis.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Classically, liver transplantation (LT) can be curable for HCC tumors within the Milan criteria. Bridging strategies to reduce the dropouts from LT waiting lists or/and to downstage patients who are beyond Milan criteria are widely utilized. We conducted a literature-based review to evaluate the role of systemic therapies as a bridging treatment to liver transplantation (LT) in HCC patients. Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) can be used as a bridging systemic therapy to LT in patients with contraindication to locoregional liver-directed therapies. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) treatment can be utilized either as a monotherapy or as a combination therapy with Bevacizumab or TKIs prior to LT. Acute rejection post liver transplantation is a concern in the context of ICIs treatment. Thus, a safe ICI washout period before LT and cautious post-LT immunosuppression strategies are required to reduce post-LT rejections and to optimize clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, prospective clinical trials are needed to establish definitive conclusions about the utility of systemic therapy as a bridging modality prior to LT in HCC patients.

We report a case of recurrent pericarditis as an immune-related adverse event in a 47-year-old man with de novo metastatic renal cell carcinoma. After first-line treatment with sunitinib failed, he received three cycles of nivolumab and developed pericarditis following each cycle. The third cycle was accompanied by colchicine as a secondary prophylaxis. Pericarditis is an uncommon and potentially life-threatening immune-related adverse event, if not managed promptly.

Melanoma is a common cancer worldwide. Introduction of new treatments through clinical trials is essential to reduce the global burden from melanoma; however, it is estimated that 22% of oncological clinical trials are terminated early. We conducted the first cross-sectional study to assess melanoma clinical trial termination and nonpublication with an aim to guide scientists conducting such trials. We identified all phase III/IV clinical trials evaluating melanoma therapies in the ClinicalTrials.gov database between 2010 and 2024. For each trial, we extracted data on the trial’s status, melanoma stage, melanoma subtype, included age, funding sources, trial locations, publication status, and reasons for termination. A descriptive and frequency analysis was performed in JASP 0.19 software. A total of 108 trials were analyzed; the majority of trials included stage III/IV melanoma (n = 95), and cutaneous melanoma was the most common subtype. Only 15 trials included pediatric patients. Industrial funding accounted for 74% (n = 80) of trials’ financing. Most of the trials were conducted internationally in North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, with a few trials conducted in South Africa (n = 1), South America (n = 1), or China (n = 5). Early termination was observed in 21% (n = 23) of trials, with no association between early termination and melanoma stage, subtype, age, funding source, or trial locations. Notably, the most common reason for early termination was publication of interim efficacy and safety results (n = 14/23). Our study confirms that early termination of phase III and IV melanoma trials doesn’t raise a significant concern; however, diversified funding and broader geographic representation are needed to create more equitable and inclusive trials. We also suggest conducting further cross-sectional studies on phase I/II melanoma trials.

Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare malignancy. Despite effective local control, 10–50% of patients develop metastatic disease, which is associated with poor prognosis. Real-world data remain lacking. This study evaluated the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes of metastatic UM in a comprehensive cancer center in Jordan. Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients with metastatic UM treated and followed at King Hussein Cancer Center in Jordan (2006–2025). Baseline characteristics and treatment patterns were collected. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed in JASP v0.95.4 and R v4.5.3. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Among 125 patients with followed UM, 31 (24.8%) had metastatic disease and were included in the analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 51 years, 61.3% were males, 61.2% had an ECOG PS 0–1, and 51.6% had hepatic-only metastases. Median time to distant metastasis was 25 months. Median OS from initial diagnosis was 35 months, while median post-metastatic OS (PM-OS) was 10 months. First-line immunotherapy was associated with improved PM-OS compared to Dacarbazine (median, 11 vs. 5 months; p = 0.034; 24-month PM-OS, 44.4% vs. 0%). In exploratory analysis, patients who continued immunotherapy beyond radiologic progression, consistent with pseudoprogression, had longer PM-OS than those who discontinued therapy (median, 32 vs. 6 months; Log-rank p = 0.020). Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, metastatic UM was associated with poor outcomes and limited access to novel therapies including Tebentafusp. First-line immunotherapy may be associated with favorable survival outcomes, and hypothesis-generating exploratory analysis suggested potential benefit from immunotherapy continuation beyond radiologic progression.