Ying Liu

Dr. Ying Liu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
SZShimei Zheng
Shimei Zheng
YWYandong Wang
Yandong Wang
CCCuihong Chen
Cuihong Chen
XZXiaojing Zhou
Xiaojing Zhou
YLYing Liu
Ying Liu
Fengxia YangFengxia Yang
Fengxia Yang
Antibiotics are used extensively throughout the world and their presence in the environment has caused serious pollution. This review summarizes natural methods and enhanced technologies that have been developed for antibiotic degradation. In the natural environment, antibiotics can be degraded by photolysis, hydrolysis, and biodegradation, but the rate and extent of degradation are limited. Recently, developed enhanced techniques utilize biological, chemical, or physicochemical principles for antibiotic removal. These techniques include traditional biological methods, adsorption methods, membrane treatment, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), constructed wetlands (CWs), microalgae treatment, and microbial electrochemical systems (such as microbial fuel cells, MFCs). These techniques have both advantages and disadvantages and, to overcome disadvantages associated with individual techniques, hybrid techniques have been developed and have shown significant potential for antibiotic removal. Hybrids include combinations of the electrochemical method with AOPs, CWs with MFCs, microalgal treatment with activated sludge, and AOPs with MFCs. Considering the complexity of antibiotic pollution and the characteristics of currently used removal technologies, it is apparent that hybrid methods are better choices for dealing with antibiotic contaminants.

26 June 2024 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYing Liu
Ying Liu
XTXiao Tang
Xiao Tang
XYXi-Hai Yan
Xi-Hai Yan
WLWang Li-Hua
Wang Li-Hua
TXTai Xi-Shi
Tai Xi-Shi
DZDong-Qiu Zhao
Dong-Qiu Zhao
A new binuclear Gd(III) complex, [Gd2(L)6(Phen)2]·4H2O, was synthesized via the reaction of gadolinium(III) nitrate hexahydrate, 4-acetylphenoxyacetic acid (HL), NaOH, and 1,10-phenanthroline (Phen) in a solution of water–ethanol (v:v = 1:1). The Gd(III) complex was characterized using IR, UV–vis, TG-DSC, fluorescence, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. The results showed that the Gd(III) complex crystallizes in the triclinic system, space group P-1, and each Gd(III) ion was coordinated with two nitrogen atoms (N1, N2, or N1a, and N2a) from two Phen ligands and seven oxygen atoms (O1, O2, O7a, O9, O8, O8a, O10a, or O1a, O2a, O7, O8, O8a, O9a, and O10) from six L ligands, respectively, forming a nine-coordinated coordination mode. The Gd(III) complex molecules formed a one-dimensional chained and three-dimensional network structure via benzenering π-π stacking. The Hirschfeld surface analysis and the calculations of the electron density distributions of the frontier molecular orbitals of the Gd(III) complex were performed. The catalytic activities of the photocatalytic CO2 reduction and benzyl alcohol oxidation using the Gd(III) complex as a catalyst were performed. The results of the photocatalytic CO2 reduction showed that the yield and the selectivity of CO reached 41.5 μmol/g and more than 99% after four hours, respectively. The results of the benzyl alcohol oxidation showed that the yield of benzaldehyde was 45.7% at 120 °C with THF as the solvent under 0.5 MPa O2 within 2 h.

28 April 2022 in ACS Omega
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JYJinmei Yang
Jinmei Yang
QGQijin Geng
Qijin Geng
YZYaobin Zhou
Yaobin Zhou
YWYuanfang Wang
Yuanfang Wang
ZLZhihua Li
Zhihua Li
YLYing Liu
Ying Liu
The quantitative evaluation of azelaic acid is becoming critical in the development of new medicinal products and in environment. A feasible method for the determination of azelaic acid in cosmetics by gas chromatographic-mass spectrometer detector (GC-MS) with derivation was developed and optimized. The derivative effect was good, when azelaic acid was derivatized through ethanol at room temperature for 10 min with 800 μL of sulfuric acid as a catalyst. A good linear relationship of azelaic acid derivative was present from 10 to 1000 mg L-1 (R 2 = 0.9997). Detection limit and quantitative limit of GC was 15 and 50 mg kg-1, respectively. The recovery rate was in the range from 87.7% to 101% with all relative standard deviation (RSD) values less than 4%, denoting the method meeting the requirement of the analysis. Therefore, this method has the advantages of strong anti-interference ability and accurate results. Among the eight samples nominally azelaic acid, only three were detected. The respective content was 78 133, 16 710, and 2431 mg kg-1. The results showed that the actual addition of the azelaic acid in the market was quite different with label identification, being worthy of further attention. Further, it also provided a favorable experience for the monitoring of azelaic acid in the environment.