Jiankun Peng

Mr. Jiankun Peng


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

1 July 2018 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJingda Wu
Jingda Wu
Hongwen HeHongwen He
Hongwen He
JPJiankun Peng
Jiankun Peng
YLYuecheng Li
Yuecheng Li
ZLZhanjiang Li
Zhanjiang Li

1 August 2019 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YWYuankai Wu
Yuankai Wu
HTHuachun Tan
Huachun Tan
JPJiankun Peng
Jiankun Peng
HZHailong Zhang
Hailong Zhang
Hongwen HeHongwen He
Hongwen He

1 November 2019 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XHXuefeng Han
Xuefeng Han
Hongwen HeHongwen He
Hongwen He
JWJingda Wu
Jingda Wu
JPJiankun Peng
Jiankun Peng
YLYuecheng Li
Yuecheng Li

3 July 2019 in IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYuecheng Li
Yuecheng Li
Hongwen HeHongwen He
Hongwen He
JPJiankun Peng
Jiankun Peng
HWHong Wang
Hong Wang
It is essential to develop proper energy management strategies (EMSs) with broad adaptability for hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs). This paper utilizes deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to develop EMSs for a series HEV (SHEV) due to DRL's advantages of requiring no future driving information in derivation and good generalization in solving energy management problem formulated as a Markov decision process (MDP). History cumulative trip information is also integrated for effective State of Charge (SoC) guidance in DRL-based EMSs. The proposed method is systematically introduced from offline training to online applications; its learning ability, optimality, and generalization are validated by comparisons with fuel economy benchmark optimized by dynamic programming (DP), and real-time EMSs based on model predictive control (MPC). Simulation results indicate that without priori knowledge of future trip, original DRL-based EMS achieves an average 3.5% gap from benchmark, superior to MPC-based EMS with accurate prediction; after further applying output frequency adjustment, a mean gap of 8.7%, which is comparable with MPC-based EMS with mean prediction error of 1m/s, is maintained with concurrently noteworthy improvement in reducing engine start times. Besides, its impressive computation speed of about 0.001s per simulation step proves its practical application potential, and this method is independent of powertrain topology such that it is applicative for any type of HEVs even when future driving information is unavailable.

1 November 2019 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJiankun Peng
Jiankun Peng
JLJiayi Luo
Jiayi Luo
Hongwen HeHongwen He
Hongwen He
BLBing Lu
Bing Lu