The aim of the research was to determine the potential of hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) in reducing nitrogen oxides and particulate matter emissions from the Perkins 854E-E34TA compression ignition engine. The concentrations of these toxic exhaust gas components were measured using the following analyzers: AVL CEB II (for NOx concentration measurement) and Horiba Mexa 1230 PM (for PM measurement). The measurements were carried out in the ESC test on a compression ignition engine with direct fuel injection and a turbocharger. The engine had a common rail fuel supply system and met the Stage IIIB/Tier 4 exhaust emission standard. Two fuels were used in the tests: diesel fuel (DF) and hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO). As part of the experiment, the basic indicators of engine operation were also determined (torque, effective power, and fuel consumption) and selected parameters of the combustion process, such as the instantaneous pressure of the working medium in the combustion chamber, maximum pressures and temperatures in the combustion chamber, and the heat release rate (HRR), were calculated. The tests were carried out in accordance with the ESC test because the authors wanted to determine how the new generation HVO fuel, powering a modern combustion engine with a common rail fuel system, would perform in a stationary emission test. Based on the obtained research results, the authors concluded that HVO fuel can replace diesel fuel in diesel engines even without major modifications or changes in engine settings.

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of adding ethanol to diesel fuel on particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions in the Perkins 854E compression-ignition engine. Tests were carried out under European Stationary Cycle (ESC) conditions using the Horiba Mexa 1230 PM analyzer (HORIBA, Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) for particulate measurement and the AVL CEB II analyzer (AVL, Graz, Austria) for NO_x concentration. The engine under investigation featured direct injection, turbocharging, a common-rail fuel supply system, and complied with the Stage IIIB/Tier 4 emission standard. Two types of fuel were used: conventional diesel fuel (DF) and diesel with a 10% ethanol additive by volume (DFE10). In addition to emissions measurements, key engine performance parameters, such as torque, effective power, and fuel consumption, were analyzed. The ESC test was specifically chosen to isolate the influence of the fuel’s properties by avoiding the effects of changes in combustion control strategies. Due to the lower calorific value of DFE10 compared to DF, a slight increase in fuel consumption was observed under certain operating conditions. Nevertheless, overall engine performance remained largely unchanged. The test results showed that the use of DFE10 led to a significant 44% reduction in particulate matter emissions and a moderate 2.2% decrease in NO_x emissions compared to conventional diesel fuel. These findings highlight the potential of ethanol as a diesel fuel additive to reduce harmful exhaust emissions without negatively affecting the performance of modern diesel engines.