At its earliest appearance, atrial fibrillation (AF) is often unnoticed, asymptomatic, and/or merely device-detected. Widespread use of heart-rate monitoring technologies has facilitated such “nascent atrial fibrillation (nAF)” recognition. Consequently, clinicians face a growing number of patients affected by new-onset AF in the absence of a definite indication for anticoagulation due to several counterarguments: (1) a CHA₂DS₂-VA score ≤ 1 in otherwise apparently healthy subjects; (2) an uncertain embolic/hemorrhagic benefit/risk ratio with anticoagulation; (3) EKG demonstration and confirmation of AF; and (4) existence of a pathogenic mechanism other than atrial hypercoagulability. In this frustrating limitation of pharmacological options, cardiologists may miss a complete comprehension of drugs with proven anti-ictal potential, whose administration may serve both as a bridge strategy toward future anticoagulation and as a consolidative strategy paralleling anticoagulation. This review aims to summarize and elucidate such therapeutic strategies and their preventative mechanisms.

Arrhythmic risk stratification in patients with Lamin A/C gene (LMNA)-related cardiomyopathy influences clinical decisions. An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) should be considered in patients with an estimated 5-year risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmia (MVA) of ≥10%. The risk prediction score for MVA includes non-missense LMNA mutations, despite their role as an established risk factor for sudden cardiac death (SCD) has been questioned in several studies. The purpose of this study is to investigate cardiac features and find gene–phenotype correlations that would contribute to the evidence on the prognostic implications of non-missense vs. missense mutations in a cohort of LMNA mutant patients. An observational, prospective study was conducted in which 54 patients positive for a Lamin A/C mutation were enrolled, and 20 probands (37%) were included. The median age at first clinical manifestation was 41 (IQR 19) years. The median follow-up was 8 years (IQR 8). The type of LMNA gene mutation was distributed as follows: missense in 26 patients (48%), non-frameshift insertions in 16 (30%), frameshift deletions in 5 (9%), and nonsense in 7 (13%). Among the missense mutation carriers, two (8%) died and four (15%) were admitted onto the heart transplant list or underwent transplantation, with a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate of 35%. No statistically significant differences in MACE prevalence were identified according to the missense and non-missense mutation groups (p value = 0.847). Our data shift the spotlight on this considerable topic and could suggest that some missense mutations may deserve attention regarding SCD risk stratification in real-world clinical settings.