Introduction: Mediastinal or hilar lymph node metastases are a challenging condition in patients affected by solid tumors. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) could play a crucial role in the therapeutic management and in the so-called “no-fly zone”, delivering high doses of radiation in relatively few treatment fractions with excellent sparing of healthy surrounding tissues and low toxicity. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of SBRT in the treatment of mediastinal and hilar lesions with particular regard to the radiotherapy doses, dose constraints for organs at risk, and clinical outcomes. Materials and methods: Two blinded investigators performed a critical review of the Medline, Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA), starting from a specific question: What is the clinical impact of SBRT for the treatment of oligorecurrent/oligoprogressive mediastinal and hilar metastasis? All retrospective and prospective clinical trials published in English up to February 2022 were analyzed. Results: A total of 552 articles were identified and 12 of them were selected with a total number of 478 patients treated with SBRT for mediastinal or hilar node recurrence. All the studies are retrospective, published between 2015 and 2021 with a median follow-up ranging from 12 to 42.2 months. Studies following SBRT for lung lesions or retreatments after thorax radiotherapy for stage III lung cancer were also included. The studies showed extensive heterogeneity in terms of patient and treatment characteristics. Non-small cell lung cancer was the most frequently reported histology. Different dose schemes were used, with a higher prevalence of 4–8 Gy in 5 or 6 fractions, but dose escalation was also used up to 52 Gy in 4 fractions with dose constraints mainly derived from RTOG 0813 trial. The radiotherapy technique most frequently used was volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with a median PTV volume ranging from 7 to 25.7 cc. The clinical outcome seems to be very encouraging with 1-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates ranging from 84 to 94%, 53 to 88% and 23 to 53.9%, respectively. Half of the studies did not report toxicity greater than G3 and only five cases of fatal toxicity were reported. CONCLUSIONS: From the present review, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions because of the heterogeneity of the studies analyzed. However, SBRT appears to be a safe and effective option in the treatment of mediastinal and hilar lymph node recurrence, with a good toxicity profile. Its use in clinical practice is still limited, and there is extensive heterogeneity in patient selection and fractionation schedules. Good performance status, small PTV volume, absence of previous thoracic irradiation, and administration of a high biologically effective dose (BED) seem to be factors that correlate with greater local control and better survival rates. In the presence of symptoms related to the thoracic lymph nodes, SBRT determines a rapid control that lasts over time. We look forward to the prospective studies that are underway for definitive conclusions.

Breast cancer represents the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the female population, despite continuing advances in treatment options that have significantly accelerated in recent years. Conservative treatments have radically changed the concept of healing, also focusing on the psychological aspect of oncological treatments. In this scenario, radiotherapy plays a key role. Brachytherapy is an extremely versatile radiation technique that can be used in various settings for breast cancer treatment. Although it is invasive, technically complex, and requires a long learning curve, the dosimetric advantages and sparing of organs at risk are unequivocal. Literature data support muticatheter interstitial brachytherapy as the only method with strong scientific evidence to perform partial breast irradiation and reirradiation after previous conservative surgery and external beam radiotherapy, with longer follow-up than new, emerging radiation techniques, whose effectiveness is proven by over 20 years of experience. The aim of our work is to provide a comprehensive view of the use of interstitial brachytherapy to perform breast lumpectomy boost, breast-conserving accelerated partial breast irradiation, and salvage reirradiation for ipsilateral breast recurrence, with particular focus on the implant description, limits, and advantages of the technique.

Introduction: Considering the increasing number of conservative surgeries (quadrantectomies) for primary breast carcinoma, especially in the early stages, often followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, the incidence of radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAS) is expected to rise in the coming decades, and it will represent a clinical and therapeutic challenge, as limited data are available due to the rarity and heterogeneity of the disease. Though the prognosis of these patients is poor, a number of clinical and pathological factors can be evaluated to better understand the course of RAS. The aim of this systematic review is to explore the available clinical-pathological, therapeutic, and prognostic data regarding RAS to evaluate its occurrence, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Method: RAS clinical data were identified by a systematic review conducted in five different databases (Medline, Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane). Only RAS works published in English, with access to the full manuscript text, and with clear results, were considered as eligible. Results: We considered 52 papers comprising 319 RAS cases. The patient age at diagnosis ranged from 37 to 93 years, with most cases occurring from 5 to 10 years after breast irradiation. The most common clinical presentation was an aggressive development of macules, papules, or erythematous-violaceous skin discoloration at the site of previous radiation treatment for primary breast carcinoma. Complete surgical excision appeared to be the first-line treatment of the disease, in some cases followed by adjuvant local and/or systemic therapies. Despite different treatments, local recurrence rates ranged from 40% to 90%, leading to negative outcomes and poor prognosis for patients. Conclusion: Although the literature is limited and the data are heterogeneous and contentious, our review aims to highlight the importance of early diagnosis, multimodal treatment, and long-term follow-up of RAS in order to limit and prevent the aggressiveness of this neoplasm.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive astrocytic primary brain tumor, and concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy (RT) followed by maintenance of adjuvant TMZ is the current standard of care. Despite advances in imaging techniques and multi-modal treatment options, the median overall survival (OS) remains poor. As an alternative to surgery, re-irradiation (re-RT) can be a therapeutic option in recurrent GBM. Re-irradiation for brain tumors is increasingly used today, and several studies have demonstrated its feasibility. Besides differing techniques, the published data include a wide range of doses, emphasizing that no standard approach exists. The current study aimed to investigate the safety of moderate–high-voxel-based dose escalation in recurrent GBM. From 2016 to 2019, 12 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in this prospective single-center study. Retreatment consisted of re-irradiation with a total dose of 30 Gy (up to 50 Gy) over 5 days using the IMRT (arc VMAT) technique. A dose painting by numbers (DPBN)/dose escalation plan were performed, and a continuous relation between the voxel intensity of the functional image set and the risk of recurrence in that voxel were used to define target and dose distribution. Re-irradiation was well tolerated in all treated patients. No toxicities greater than G3 were recorded; only one patient had severe G3 acute toxicity, characterized by muscle weakness and fatigue. Median overall survival (OS2) and progression-free survival (PFS2) from the time of re-irradiation were 10.4 months and 5.7 months, respectively; 3-, 6-, and 12-month OS2 were 92%, 75%, and 42%, respectively; and 3-, 6-, and 12-month PFS2 were 83%, 42%, and 8%, respectively. Our work demonstrated a tolerable tolerance profile of this approach, and the future prospective phase II study will analyze the efficacy in terms of PFS and OS.

Background: The rates of local failure after curative radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PC) remain high despite more accurate locoregional treatments available, with one third of patients experiencing biochemical failure and clinical relapse occurring in 30–47% of cases. Today, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the treatment of choice in this setting, but with not negligible toxicity and low effects on local disease. Therefore, the treatment of intraprostatic PC recurrence represents a challenge for radiation oncologists. Prostate reirradiation (Re-I) might be a therapeutic possibility. We present our series of patients treated with salvage stereotactic Re‑I for intraprostatic recurrence of PC after radical radiotherapy, with the aim of evaluating feasibility and safety of linac-based prostate Re‑I. Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated toxicities and outcomes of patients who underwent salvage reirradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for intraprostatic PC recurrence. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, histologically proven diagnosis of PC, salvage Re‑I for intraprostatic recurrence after primary radiotherapy for PC with curative intent, concurrent/adjuvant ADT with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allowed, performance status ECOG 0–2, restaging choline/PSMA-PET/TC and prostate MRI after biochemical recurrence, and signed informed consent. Results: From January 2019 to April 2022, 20 patients were recruited. Median follow-up was 26.7 months (range 7–50). After SBRT, no patients were lost at follow-up and all are still alive. One- and 2‑year progression free survival (PFS) was 100% and 81.5%, respectively, while 2‑year biochemical progression-free survival (bFFS) was 88.9%. Four patients (20%) experienced locoregional lymph node progression and were treated with a further course of SBRT. Prostate reirradiation allowed the ADT start to be postponed for 12–39 months. Re‑I was well tolerated by all patients and none discontinued the treatment. No cases of ≥ G3 genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were reported. Seven (35%) and 2 (10%) patients experienced acute G1 and G2 GU toxicity, respectively. Late GU toxicity was recorded in 10 (50%) patients, including 8 (40%) G1 and 2 (10%) G2. ADT-related side effects were found in 7 patients (hot flashes and asthenia). Conclusion: Linac-based SBRT is a safe technique for performing Re‑I for intraprostatic recurrence after primary curative radiotherapy for PC. Future prospective, randomized studies are desirable to better understand the effectiveness of reirradiation and the still open questions in this field.