In response to the critical need for enhanced resource management in the construction industry, this research develops an innovative, integrated methodology that synergistically combines Agent-Based Modeling (ABM), Building Information Modeling (BIM), and Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) technologies. Central to our approach is a sophisticated technological framework that incorporates a Client Early Warning System (CEWS) and a Decision Support System (DSS). These systems facilitate real-time monitoring and management of construction resources, ensuring operational efficiency and optimal resource utilization. Our methodology was empirically validated through a comprehensive case study at Helwan University’s College of Engineering. The results demonstrated a significant enhancement in operational efficiency, particularly in resource allocation and progress tracking. Key practical outcomes include the development of a CEWS master dashboard that provides in-depth, real-time insights into project metrics. This dashboard was crucial for managing compliance with health protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic, showcasing the framework’s adaptability to critical health standards. Further, the integration of indoor tracking technology revolutionized attendance tracking by replacing outdated manual methods with automated processes. This capability not only underscores the practical applicability of our research but also establishes a new benchmark for future technological advancements in construction project management. Our study sets the stage for subsequent innovations, paving the way for a more connected, efficient, and data-driven approach in the construction industry.

This study delves into the dynamics of ‘Variations’ and ‘Claims’ in construction projects. This study aims to identify, categorize, and devise mitigation strategies for critical types of variations and claims that are aligned with the contract’s FIDIC conditions. The research draws on input from construction industry professionals, including contract administrators and project managers, and focuses on the MENA region. The region’s extensive adoption of FIDIC standards and the rapidly growing construction sector drive this choice. Data collection encompassed a questionnaire distributed to 80 industry experts, predominantly through interviews focused on countries such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait, and Egypt. Utilizing SPSS-V.25 for statistical analysis, this study uncovers the most prevalent and impactful causes of variations and claims, highlighting the critical need for managerial intervention. A key feature is the integration of scientometric analysis into a quantitative finding. Implementing a k-means clustering analysis is a significant addition to the methodology. The survey had high internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.97, and the respondents reported frequent and significant claims such as delayed drawings, ambiguous documents, and client changes. The results showed that effective claims management requires clear communication and balanced contracts, while poor design and contract documentation cause variations and claims. The correlation analysis showed strong positive correlations between claim types and causes. To reduce claims and address these factors, most respondents said the survey could predict and reduce claims.

The domain of construction engineering and management is evolving rapidly. Optimizing resource positioning is crucial for meeting the challenges of efficiency and productivity. This research presents a novel methodology that incorporates Agent-Based Modeling (ABM), Building Information Modeling (BIM), and Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) technologies, augmented with a Client Early Warning System (CEWS) and a Decision Support System (DSS). What makes this study unique is that it provides a real-time methodology for resource allocation and project management, tailored to address the complexities of modern construction projects. The application of this integrated technological framework marks a significant leap in construction management, empowering data-driven decision-making and significantly improving project efficiency. Empirically validated through a case study at Helwan University's College of Engineering and substantiated by expert surveys, this research showcases a transformative model for resource management. The findings not only underscore the practical applicability of this approach but also open new horizons for its adoption in global construction practices, offering insights for future research endeavors focused on expanding these methodologies to a wider range of resources.

This study delves into the dynamics of 'Variations' and 'Claims' within construction projects, specifically under the FIDIC-Red Book 1999 framework. The study aims to identify, categorize, and devise mitigation strategies for key types of variations and claims aligning with the FIDIC conditions of contract. The research is drawing on inputs from construction industry professionals including contract administrators and project managers, focusing on the MENA region. This choice is driven by the region's extensive adoption of FIDIC standards and its rapidly growing construction sector. Data collection encompassed a questionnaire distributed to 80 industry experts predominantly through interviews that focused on countries like Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, and Egypt. These locations were chosen to reflect diverse construction practices and the involvement of international firms. Utilizing SPSS-V.25 for statistical analysis, the study uncovers the most prevalent and impactful causes of variations and claims, highlighting the critical need for managerial intervention. A key feature is the integration of scientometric analysis for a quantitative finding. A significant addition to the methodology is the implementation of a k-means clustering analysis. The survey had high internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.97, and respondents reported frequent and significant claims like delayed drawings, ambiguous documents, and client changes. The results showed that effective claims management requires clear communication and balanced contracts, while poor design and contract documentation cause variations and claims. Spearman's correlation showed strong positive relationships between certain claim types and causes, emphasizing the importance of dealing with these factors to reduce claims. Most respondents said the survey could predict and reduce claims.