This study aimed to evaluate the influence of denture cleansers on the color, stability, and surface roughness of three-dimensional (3D)-printed denture base resins modified with zirconium dioxide nanoparticles (nano-ZrO₂). A total of 440 specimens were fabricated using one heat-polymerized resin, and two 3D-printed resins (NextDent and ASIGA). According to the nano-ZrO₂ content, the specimens for each resin were divided into five groups (0%, 0.5%wt, 1%wt, 3%wt, and 5%wt). Each concentration was divided into four subgroups (n = 10) based on the immersion solution (distilled water, sodium hypochlorite, Corega, and Fittydent) and immersion duration (360 and 720 days). The color changes (∆E₀₀) and surface roughness (Ra, µm) of each specimen were measured at different time intervals (base line, 360 days, 720 days) using a spectrophotometer and a non-contact profilometer, respectively. The results were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and a post hoc Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). Sodium hypochlorite showed the highest significant color change of all the denture base resins (p < 0.001). The average value of ΔE₀₀ for sodium hypochlorite was significantly higher than the values for the other solutions (Fittydent, Corega, and water) (p < 0.001). Color stability was significantly affected by immersion time for all types of solutions except Corega (p < 0.001). All of the tested immersion solutions (distilled water, sodium hypochlorite, Corega, and Fittydent) showed a significant increase in the surface roughness of all the denture base resins (p < 0.05). Surface roughness was substantially increased by immersion time for all types of solution except Fittydent (p < 0.001). Denture cleansers can result in substantial color change and affect the surface roughness of unmodified and nanoparticle-modified denture base resins. Therefore, the selection of denture cleanser and appropriate types of material is critical for denture longevity.

Background: Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology is becoming a more significant means of providing prosthodontic treatment due to its impact on clinical performance and patient outcomes. It has been integrated into dental education to allow students to experience digital work-flows. Despite these advancements, many dental students still lack sufficient knowledge of CAD-CAM technologies. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. Based on previous studies, a validated questionnaire was distributed to undergraduate dental students and interns. The questionnaire assessed their knowledge and attitudes toward CAD-CAM technology in prosthetic dentistry. Statistical analysis software utilized in the study was the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Results: The responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and a chi-square test was used to study the association between knowledge and practice and the study year level. A total of 170 students participated in the study, with a mean age of 22.2 (±2.5) years. The proportion of female participants was 65.9% and the proportion of males was 34.1%. Knowledge varied across academic levels, with fourth- and fifth-year students demonstrating greater theoretical knowledge, while sixth-year students and interns showed more practical experience. Only 3 of the 18 knowledge-related questions received a correct response rate above 70%. Most participants (86%) reported acquiring knowledge from undergraduate courses, and 88% expressed interest in further training. Conclusions: CAD-CAM technology was most commonly practiced for fixed prostheses, and intraoral scanning was the most frequently used digital work-flow. The study highlights the need to improve CAD-CAM education. While lower-level students displayed solid theoretical knowledge, advanced students benefitted from more practical exposure. Increasing hands-on experience and access to digital equipment is essential for preparing students to meet the demands of modern digitalized dentistry.

Background: Shade selection is a critical procedure of any esthetic prosthodontic treatment process. Despite its importance, there is a concern regarding the awareness and knowledge of shade selection among dental students and practitioners. Purpose: To evaluate the knowledge of dental students and practitioners regarding shade selection principles and investigate the differences in aesthetic prioritization between fixed and removable prostheses. Additionally, to investigate the emphasis placed on aesthetics in removable prosthetic cases compared to fixed prostheses, and to examine how this emphasis differs between dental students and experienced practitioners. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted involving students and dental practitioners. The questionnaire consisted of multiple-choice questions designed to evaluate participants’ knowledge of shade selection principles and methods used in contemporary dental clinical practice and the perceived impact on treatment outcomes in Saudi Arabia. This study involved 554 participants, divided into three groups: 117 who treated fixed cases, 51 who treated removable cases, and 398 who treated both fixed and removable cases. The collected data was tabulated for data analysis using the Mann–Whitney U test and the Kruskal–Wallis test to generate the significance per category. Results: The study revealed no significant differences in knowledge and practice scores across the demographic factors for participants who exclusively treated either fixed or removable cases, suggesting a uniformity in expertise and application. However, among participants who managed both fixed and removable cases, significant variations emerged based on gender, age, and educational or professional level. Notably, a statistically significant disparity (p < 0.05) was observed in the comprehension of digital shade-matching technology, with practicing dentists exhibiting a higher level of awareness compared to dental students. Conclusions: The study concluded that age, gender, and education level significantly impact the knowledge and practice of shade selection. The findings highlighted a concerning gap in the awareness and knowledge regarding shade selection by dental students compared to practitioners, which emphasizes the need for enhanced educational training programs focusing on shade selection techniques and their implications for prosthodontic outcomes.

Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology is growing in significance for prosthodontic treatment due to its impact on clinical performance and patient outcomes. It has been integrated into dental education to allow students to experience digital workflows. Despite these advancements, many dental students still lack sufficient knowledge of CAD-CAM technologies. A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. Based on previous studies, a validated questionnaire was distributed to undergraduate dental students and interns. The questionnaire assessed their knowledge and attitudes toward CAD-CAM technology in prosthetic dentistry. The responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and a chi-square test was used to study the association between knowledge and practice and the study year level. A total of 170 students participated in the study, with a mean age of 22.2 (±2.5) years. The proportion of female participants was 65.9%, and 34.1% for males. Knowledge varied across academic levels, with 4th- and 5th-year students demonstrating greater theoretical knowledge, while 6th-year students and interns showed more practical experience. Only three of the 18 knowledge-related questions received a correct response rate above 70%. Most participants (86%) reported acquiring knowledge from undergraduate courses, and 88% expressed interest in further training. CAD-CAM technology was most commonly practiced for fixed prostheses, and intraoral scanning was the most frequently used digital workflow. The study highlights the need to improve CAD-CAM education. While lower-level students displayed solid theoretical knowledge, advanced students benefitted from more practical exposure. Increasing hands-on experience and access to digital equipment is essential for preparing students to meet the demands of modern digitalized dentistry.