Medium and small-scale high-clearance sprayers are widely applied in medium and small-scale farms. Owing to power and load limitations, it is difficult to manage the complex system for suppressing spray boom vibration. This study was conducted to design a spray boom-air suspension system suitable for medium and small-size high-clearance sprayers by combining spray boom vibration suppression and the characteristics of air spring charging/discharging. Thus, this study aims to address the non-homogeneous distribution of spray triggered by the spray boom vibrations in medium and small high-clearance sprayers. The effects of different elastic elements on the vibration suppression effect of the spray boom were compared. According to the bench test, the dynamic response results of the spray boom under transient and sinusoidal excitations indicate that air spring is more conducive to vibration suppression than coil spring. The results obtained from the field experiments indicate that under the low solid soil condition, the spray boom air suspension should match a small additional air chamber with a volume of approximately 0.6 L, and the damping coefficient of the damper should be approximately 1792 N·s/m. In the case of the high firm soil, the spray boom air suspension should match a large additional air chamber with a volume of approximately 3.6 L, while the damping coefficient of the damper should be set to approximately 1316 N·s/m. The soil with low moisture content and high firmness are unfavorable to the vibration suppression of the spray boom. This study provides a reference for enhancing the vibration suppression of the spray boom-air suspension and improving the spray uniformity of the sprayer.

This study evaluated the properties of a new double air-assisted electrostatic orchard sprayer, focusing particularly on the impact of its electrostatic system on droplet deposition. The sprayer featured 10 nozzles, a centrifugal fan, and an axial fan, with an overall flow rate of 3.5 L/min and nozzle air velocities of 25 m/s (interior) and 12.5 m/s (exterior). Droplet sampling was conducted using paper cards and ponceau solution as a tracer. Field measurements in a Y-tree trained pear orchard assessed the effects of tractor speeds (0.34, 0.52, 0.84, and 1.05 m/s) and sampling positions (exposed and hidden faces). Tractor speed did not significantly affect overall droplet density, but the normalized droplet density on the exposed face increased with speed, while it decreased on the hidden face. The average normalized droplet density at all speeds was approximately 114.6 dot/cm2. The electrostatic system improved droplet deposition on the hidden face of leaves, particularly on the side of the tree near the sprayer. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the exposed face increased with tractor speed, while tractor speed had no impact on the CV of the hidden face. Overall, the electrostatic system reduced the CV. This research offers valuable insights into the use of electrostatic sprayers.

Six different twin boundary interface models were constructed by molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the effect of biaxial load ratio on the fracture behavior of titanium twin boundaries. Analysis of microstructural evolution indicates that twin boundaries exhibit a dual role during crack propagation. On one hand, they serve as preferential sites for void nucleation, promoting crack propagation along the twin boundary; on the other hand, they provide favorable sites for dislocation nucleation, inducing local plastic deformation at the crack tip, altering the crack path, and thereby hindering crack propagation. The crack propagation behavior in the ($\overline{1}0$11) and ($\overline{1}0$13) twin boundary models shows evident asymmetry: the crack on the left side mainly propagates through the void nucleation mechanism and exhibits a faster growth rate, while the right-side twin boundary inhibits crack propagation by favoring dislocation nucleation. In contrast, the crack propagation behavior in the ($\overline{1}0$12), ($\overline{2}1$11), ($\overline{2}1$12) and ($\overline{2}1$14) twin boundary models is largely symmetric on both sides, showing no significant difference in propagation rate. Stress field analysis further reveals that the differences in crack propagation behavior among the various twin boundary models mainly originate from the disparity in dislocation activity on both sides of the crack, resulting in different levels of stress concentration at the crack tip. When void nucleation occurs at the twin boundary interface, the stress concentration between the main crack and the void intensifies, promoting their coalescence and further propagation. Meanwhile, with an increase in biaxial load ratio, the stress concentration at the crack tip becomes more pronounced, further accelerating crack propagation.