The rapid expansion of the scale of wind power has led to a wave of efforts to decommission wind turbine blades. The pyrolysis of decommissioned wind turbine blades (DWTBs) is a promising technological solution. Microwave pyrolysis offers the benefits of fast heating rates and uniform heat transfer, making it a widely used method in various heating applications. However, there are few studies on the microwave pyrolysis of DWTBs, and pyrolysis characteristics under different boundary conditions remain unclear. In this paper, we investigate the pyrolysis characteristics of DWTBs by utilizing silicon carbide (SiC) particles as a microwave absorbent. The results demonstrated that, when the microwave heating power increased from 400 W to 600 W, the heating rate and pyrolysis final temperature of the material increased, resulting in a reduction in pyrolysis residual solid yield from 88.30% to 84.40%. At 600 W, pyrolysis gas components included C₂H₄, CH₄, and CO, while the tar components included phenol and toluene. The highest degree of pyrolysis was achieved under the condition of an SiC particle size of 0.85 mm, with better heating performance, and the calorific value of the pyrolysis gas generated was 36.95 MJ/Nm³. The DWTBs did not undergo pyrolysis when SiC was not added. However, when the mass ratio of SiC to DWTBs was 4, the tar yield was 4.7% and the pyrolysis gas yield was 17.0%, resulting in a faster heating rate and the highest degree of pyrolysis. Based on this, an optimal process for the microwave pyrolysis of DWTBs was proposed, providing a reference for its industrial application.

The development of wind power has brought about increasing challenges in decommissioning, among which DWTBs (decommissioned wind turbine blades) are the most difficult component to deal with. To enable the cost-effective, energy-efficient, and environmentally friendly large-scale utilization of DWTBs, an experimental study on thermogravimetric and pyrolysis characteristics of DWTBs was carried out. A new process involving recycling glass fiber with pyrolysis gas re-combustion and flue gas recirculation as the pyrolysis medium was innovatively proposed, and the simulation calculation was carried out. Thermogravimetric experiments indicated that glass fiber reinforced composite (GFRC) was the main heat-generating part in the heat utilization process of blades, and the blade material could basically complete pyrolysis at 600 °C. As the heating rate increased, the formation temperature, peak concentration, and proportion of combustible gas in the pyrolysis gas also increased. The highest peak concentration of CO gas was observed, with CO₂ and C₃H₆ reaching their peaks at 700 °C. The solid product obtained from pyrolysis at 600 °C could be oxidized at 550 °C for 40 min to obtain clean glass fiber. And the pyrolysis temperature increased with the increase in the proportion of recirculation flue gas. When the proportion of recirculation flue gas was 66%, the pyrolysis temperature could reach 600 °C, meeting the necessary pyrolysis temperature for wind turbine blade materials. The above research provided fundamental data support for further exploration on high-value-added recycling of DWTBs.

A mathematical model of biomass ash deposition based on inertial impaction, thermophoresis deposition, and condensation was established to predict the ash deposition on the heating surface in a biomass boiler. Compared with the conventional numerical simulation methods, the mathematical models established are more focused on important design parameters in industry and can quickly calculate changes in parameters such as ash and heat flux density of heating area, and the simulated values were in good agreement with the measured results of the actual boiler. The growth of ash deposition on the heating surface of the boiler under different operating conditions was calculated by MATLAB program. The results show that the deposition caused by inertial impaction is dominant among the three deposition mechanisms. While the deposition caused by condensation is the least, accounting for only about 1%. The heat flux is only 1/2 of the initial stage when the ash deposition reaches a steady state. The ash deposition degree increases with the increasing of flue gas velocity, flue gas temperature, and particle size. When the flue gas temperature increases from 923 K to 1123 K, the ash deposition thickness increases from 7.6 mm to 14.2 mm. When the particle size increases from 12 μm to 20 μm, the thickness of ash deposition increases from 5.3 mm to 10.7 mm; when the gas velocity increased from 6 m/s to 15 m/s, the thickness of ash deposition increased from 6.5 mm to 10.6 mm. The ash depositions in two corn stalk-fired pure-combustion circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boilers were calculated, and the predicted results of the model were consistent with the actual ash deposition level.

In the context of the growing share of renewable energy and the impending decommission of a large number of coal-fired units, nuclear energy is the only green energy that can replace coal power for a stable, clean, efficient, and large-scale power supply. This article compares the differences between coal power and nuclear power in terms of thermal system, thermal cycle, turbine parameters, and safety. It discusses the possibility of replacing the boiler of a coal power plant with nuclear power, that is, replacing the boiler of a coal power plant with a nuclear reactor for generation/heating/cogeneration. For coal-fired units with similar capacity that do not use a reheat cycle (at or below high pressure) and nuclear power units (such as a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor), as well as coal-fired units with a reheat cycle (ultra-high pressure and above) and nuclear power units (such as pressurized water reactors), there are great differences in steam parameters. In terms of steam turbines, the size of nuclear power units is relatively larger, requiring additional dehumidification measures. In addition, the safety factors and management methods considered in the site selection, construction, and operation of nuclear power plants are more stringent and complex, and comprehensive analysis and evaluation are needed in aspects such as waste treatment and accident emergency response. Except for the relevant provisions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers code for pressure vessels, nuclear power units are not compatible with coal-fired units in terms of safety standards. Therefore, considering comprehensively, it is believed that the scheme of nuclear power replacing coal-fired units for power generation/heating/cogeneration program is not feasible at present.