Leanne Sijgers

Dr. Leanne Sijgers

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Trends in Hearing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLeanne Sijgers
Leanne Sijgers
FPFlurin Pfiffner
Flurin Pfiffner
JGJulian Grosse
Julian Grosse
NDNorbert Dillier
Norbert Dillier
KKKanthaiah Koka
Kanthaiah Koka
ADAdrian Dalbert
Adrian Dalbert
The use of electrocochleography (ECochG) for providing real-time feedback of cochlear function during cochlear implantation is receiving increased attention for preventing cochlear trauma and preserving residual hearing. Although various studies investigated the relationship between intra-operative ECochG measurements and surgical outcomes in recent years, the limited interpretability of ECochG response changes leads to conflicting study results and prevents the adoption of this method for clinical use. Specifically, the movement of the recording electrode with respect to the different signal generators in intracochlear recordings makes the interpretation of signal changes with respect to cochlear trauma difficult. Here, we demonstrate that comparison of ECochG signals recorded simultaneously from intracochlear locations and from a fixed extracochlear location can potentially allow a differentiation between traumatic and atraumatic signal changes in intracochlear recordings. We measured ECochG responses to 500 Hz tone bursts with alternating starting phases during cochlear implant insertions in six human cochlear implant recipients. Our results show that an amplitude decrease with associated near 180° phase shift and harmonic distortions in the intracochlear difference curve during the first half of insertion was not accompanied by a decrease in the extracochlear difference curve’s amplitude (n = 1), while late amplitude decreases in intracochlear difference curves (near full insertion, n = 2) did correspond to extracochlear amplitude decreases. These findings suggest a role for phase shifts, harmonic distortions, and recording location in interpreting intracochlear ECochG responses.

10 February 2022 in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LSLeanne Sijgers
Leanne Sijgers
AHAlexander Huber
Alexander Huber
STSonia Tabibi
Sonia Tabibi
JGJulian Grosse
Julian Grosse
CRChristof Roosli
Christof Roosli
ADAdrian Dalbert
Adrian Dalbert
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between cochlear implant (CI) electrode distances to the cochlea's inner wall (the modiolus) and electrical impedance measurements made at the CI's electrode contacts. We introduced a protocol for “three-point impedances” in which we recorded bipolar impedances in response to monopolar stimulation at a neighboring electrode. We aimed to assess the usability of three-point impedances and two existing CI impedance measurement methods (monopolar and four-point impedances) for predicting electrode positioning during CI insertion. Methods: Impedances were recorded during stepwise CI electrode array insertions in cadaveric human temporal bones. The positioning of the electrodes with respect to the modiolus was assessed at each step using cone beam computed tomography. Linear mixed regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between the impedances and electrode-modiolar distances. The experimental results were compared to clinical impedance data and to an existing lumped-element model of an implanted CI. Results: Three-point and four-point impedances strongly correlated with electrode-modiolar distance. In contrast, monopolar impedances were only minimally affected by changes in electrode positioning with respect to the modiolus. An overall model specificity of 62% was achieved when incorporating all impedance parameters. This specificity could be increased beyond 73% when prior expectations of electrode positioning were incorporated in the model. Conclusion: Three-point and four-point impedances are promising measures to predict electrode-modiolar distance in real-time during CI insertion. Significance: This work shows how electrical impedance measurements can be used to predict the CI's electrode positioning in a biologically realistic model.

1 January 2023 in Trends in Hearing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LSLeanne Sijgers
Leanne Sijgers
TSTorquil Sorensen
Torquil Sorensen
ASAndrew Soulby
Andrew Soulby
PBPatrick Boyle
Patrick Boyle
ADAdrian Dalbert
Adrian Dalbert
FPFlurin Pfiffner
Flurin Pfiffner
The objective to preserve residual hearing during cochlear implantation has recently led to the use of intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) as an intraoperative monitoring tool. Currently, a decrease in the amplitude of the difference between responses to alternating-polarity stimuli (DIF response), predominantly reflecting the hair cell response, is used for providing feedback. Including other ECochG response components, such as phase changes and harmonic distortions, could improve the accuracy of surgical feedback. The objectives of the present study were (1) to compare simultaneously recorded stepwise intracochlear and extracochlear ECochG responses to 500 Hz tone bursts, (2) to explore patterns in features extracted from the intracochlear ECochG recordings relating to hearing preservation or hearing loss, and (3) to design support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) classifiers of acoustic hearing preservation that treat each subject as a sample and use all intracochlear ECochG recordings made during electrode array insertion for classification. Forty subjects undergoing cochlear implant (CI) surgery at the Oslo University Hospital, St. Thomas’ Hearing Implant Centre, or the University Hospital of Zurich were prospectively enrolled. In this cohort, DIF response amplitude decreases did not relate to postoperative acoustic hearing preservation. Exploratory analysis of the feature set extracted from the ECochG responses and preoperative audiogram showed that the features were not discriminative between outcome classes. The SVM and RF classifiers that were trained on these features could not distinguish cases with hearing loss and hearing preservation. These findings suggest that hearing loss following CI surgery is not always reflected in intraoperative ECochG recordings.

26 July 2024 in Ear & Hearing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LSLeanne Sijgers
Leanne Sijgers
CRChristof Röösli
Christof Röösli
RBRahel Bertschinger
Rahel Bertschinger
LELorenz Epprecht
Lorenz Epprecht
DVDorothe Veraguth
Dorothe Veraguth
FPFlurin Pfiffner
Flurin Pfiffner
Objectives: The inter-phase gap (IPG) offset effect is defined as the dB offset between the linear parts of electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) amplitude growth functions for two stimuli differing only in IPG. The method was recently suggested to represent neural health in cochlear implant (CI) users while being unaffected by CI electrode impedances. Hereby, a larger IPG offset effect should reflect better neural health. The aims of the present study were to (1) examine whether the IPG offset effect negatively correlates with the ECAP threshold and the preoperative pure-tone average (PTA) in CI recipients with residual acoustic hearing and (2) investigate the dependency of the IPG offset effect on hair cell survival and intracochlear electrode impedances. Design: Seventeen adult study participants with residual acoustic hearing at 500 Hz undergoing CI surgery at the University Hospital of Zurich were prospectively enrolled. ECAP thresholds, IPG offset effects, electrocochleography (ECochG) responses to 500 Hz tone bursts, and monopolar electrical impedances were obtained at an apical, middle, and basal electrode set during and between 4 and 12 weeks after CI surgery. Pure-tone audiometry was conducted within 3 weeks before surgery and approximately 6 weeks after surgery. Linear mixed regression analyses and t tests were performed to assess relationships between (changes in) ECAP threshold, IPG offset, impedance, PTA, and ECochG amplitude. Results: The IPG offset effect positively correlated with the ECAP threshold in intraoperative recordings (p < 0.001) and did not significantly correlate with the preoperative PTA (p = 0.999). The IPG offset showed a postoperative decrease for electrode sets that showed an ECochG amplitude drop. This IPG offset decrease was significantly larger than for electrode sets that showed no ECochG amplitude decrease, t(17) = 2.76, p = 0.014. Linear mixed regression analysis showed no systematic effect of electrode impedance changes on the IPG offset effect (p = 0.263) but suggested a participant-dependent effect of electrode impedance on IPG offset. Conclusions: The present study results did not reveal the expected relationships between the IPG offset effect and ECAP threshold values or between the IPG offset effect and preoperative acoustic hearing. Changes in electrode impedance did not exhibit a direct impact on the IPG offset effect, although this impact might be individualized among CI recipients. Overall, our findings suggest that the interpretation and application of the IPG offset effect in clinical settings should be approached with caution considering its complex relationships with other cochlear and neural health metrics.

27 November 2024 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLeanne Sijgers
Leanne Sijgers
MGMarlies Geys
Marlies Geys
GGGunnar Geissler
Gunnar Geissler
PBPatrick Joseph Boyle
Patrick Joseph Boyle
AHAlexander Huber
Alexander Huber
FPFlurin Pfiffner
Flurin Pfiffner
Background: This study examined electrical bioimpedance as a biomarker for intracochlear tissue changes after cochlear implant surgery, comparing monopolar, three-point, and four-point impedance measurements over time and evaluating different measurement systems and approaches. Methods: Impedance measurements were obtained from 21 participants during surgery and at four postoperative stages. Monopolar impedances were recorded using the Bionic Ear Data Collection System (BEDCS) and the Active Insertion Monitoring (AIM) system. Three- and four-point impedances were recorded directly using BEDCS, and indirect three-point impedances were additionally derived from Electrical Field Imaging matrices recorded using BEDCS or AIM. Results: There was an 11% relative error between monopolar measurements from BEDCS and AIM and a 25% discrepancy between direct and indirect three-point measurements. Despite this, direct and indirect measurements from both systems were useful for tracking postoperative impedance shifts. Three- and four-point measurements showed a strong relationship both during and after surgery. Our results suggest that three- and four-point measurements are more specific than monopolar impedances in capturing localized tissue changes. Conclusions: Three- and four-point impedance measurements are potential markers of intracochlear tissue changes over time. While direct three-point impedance measurements offer higher accuracy, indirect measurements provide a feasible alternative for monitoring intracochlear changes in clinical settings lacking the option of direct measurements.

19 June 2025 in Audiology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDavid Bächinger
David Bächinger
MSMerlin Schaer
Merlin Schaer
AKAhmet Kunut
Ahmet Kunut
RBRahel Bertschinger
Rahel Bertschinger
IDIvo Dobrev
Ivo Dobrev
ADAdrian Dalbert
Adrian Dalbert
Background/Objectives: Electrocochleography (ECochG) is a promising tool to monitor preservation of cochlear structures and function during cochlear implant (CI) surgery. However, the interpretation of ECochG signal changes during insertion of the CI electrode array remains controversial. This study investigates the influence of the degree and localization of cochlear trauma on ECochG signal changes using a mouse model. Methods: C57BL/6J-Crl1 mice underwent intracochlear ECochG recordings during the insertion of a platinum–iridium electrode. Results: In case of grade 1 and 2 cochlear trauma, as determined by post-mortem histological analysis, we found that a reduction in intracochlear cochlear microphonic (CM) amplitude correlates more significantly with the location of the trauma than with its severity. The more basally a trauma is located, the larger the CM amplitude drop. Furthermore, the results revealed that grade 1 or 2 trauma was detectable through ECochG before more severe trauma developed. Conclusions: These findings suggest that intracochlear ECochG can serve as a reliable intraoperative tool for detecting early and possibly reversible cochlear trauma, preventing more severe damage and aiding hearing preservation. The results emphasize the need for a nuanced interpretation of CM signal drops, considering trauma location and cochlear structure integrity at the site of trauma and apical to it.