Most studies on microplastic pollution in aquatic ecosystems have focused on the quantitative and qualitative assessment of particles in surface waters. However, the highest concentrations and accumulation of microplastic particles are observed in bottom sediments. The aim of this study was to determine the concentrations of microplastic particles of different morphology in sediments in the beach and littoral zones of Lake Baikal. This study is the first in relation to Lake Baikal to focus specifically on the analysis of microplastic particles in bottom sediments. The results of the study showed that the registered values of concentration of microplastic particles do not exceed the average values for lakes around the world. The predominant type of particles in both the littoral zone and the beach is microplastic fibers. An exception is observed only for one of the locations. This exception is related to the permanent mooring of vessels in this place. Analysis of the types of artificial polymers showed that the microplastic fibers were represented by polyester, and the fragments were represented by alkyd resin (66%), polyvinyl alcohol (32%) and polyvinyl chloride (2%). Shown for the first time in this study, the presence of large numbers of microplastic particles with rare types of artificial polymers suggests that these particles may be under-reported in other studies. The underestimation of particles may be due either to the selection of sampling locations located far from heavily contaminated areas, or to the fragility of these polymers. Although the harm of these types of polymers has not yet been confirmed, the large number of these particles in local areas of lakes should be taken into account. This is due to the large number of organisms, which is usually characteristic of littoral areas, including Lake Baikal, with its diversity of fauna and flora.

Light pollution can affect various groups of aquatic organisms. This effect will vary depending on the color temperature of the artificial lighting. However, at the moment, the issue of adaptation of organisms to light pollution and the influence of different color temperatures on them has not been well-studied. In this study, we decided to conduct a series of experiments with individuals of the amphipod Gmelinoides fasciatus from two populations and find out how individuals adapted to light pollution. The first group of individuals is from the population in Lake Baikal (Bolshie Koty Bay), and the second group is from the population in the Angara River (within the city of Irkutsk). The second population is significantly affected by light pollution. Since the middle of the last century, there has been an artificial barrier between these populations in the form of a hydroelectric power station. The experiments showed that G. fasciatus individuals developed different behavioral strategies in relation to artificial lighting with different color temperatures. In warm light, individuals tend to move to a shaded area, while in cold light, individuals may be attracted to artificial lighting, but only in small groups. These identified patterns may likely find practical use.

Light pollution can have a variety of effects on aquatic organisms. Despite the fact that amphipods are one of the model organisms for studying the effects of light among macroinvertebrates, data on the reaction of Baikal amphipods to artificial lighting are limited and contradictory. In this study, we examine the response of Baikal littoral and sublittoral amphipod species to artificial lighting of varying intensity and spectral composition. In the experiments, amphipods were exposed to warm and white light at three different intensity ranges (5–15, 20–35, and 80–100 lx), as well as blue and red light. As a result, it was found that the reaction of Baikal amphipods to different lighting conditions was species-specific and dependent on the spectral composition of the light more so than the intensity of the light. In particular, white LED light generally repulsed E. cyaneus, but tended to attract A. godlevskii. P. cancelloides, and G. fasciatus, suggesting that white LED light may have a greater negative impact on wildlife than warm LED light. Generally, artificial light influences the behavior of Baikal amphipods, and an increase in light pollution on Lake Baikal may lead to changes in the littoral community in certain areas of the lake subject to pollution.

Light pollution is becoming more widespread every year, accompanied by the active use of LED lighting. Currently, the ability of organisms to adapt to this pollution and the potential impact of LED lighting of different color temperatures and intensities on organisms remains poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to find out how long-term light pollution affects the behavior of amphipods Gammarus lacustris, and to compare their locomotor activity under different lighting conditions, taking into account the factor of shelter from light. The response of individuals was compared in group and individual experiments under daylight, without light, warm and cold LED light up to 30 lx. The individuals were from two populations: the first is not exposed to light pollution (lake No. 14), while the second is affected (the Angara River within the city of Irkutsk). The locomotor activity of amphipods was assessed in daylight, without light, warm and cold light of 2–2.5 lx and 10–11 lx in the presence and absence of shelters from light. As a result of the experiments, adaptive changes in the reaction of G. lacustris to warm light were identified in individuals from the Angara River. The importance of LED light color temperature and warm light intensity in determining amphipod response to light was also confirmed. It was found that warm and cold light have different effects on the behavior of G. lacustris, and the presence of shelters from light can reduce the negative impact of light pollution in natural conditions.