Light pollution can have a variety of effects on aquatic organisms. Despite the fact that amphipods are one of the model organisms for studying the effects of light among macroinvertebrates, data on the reaction of Baikal amphipods to artificial lighting are limited and contradictory. In this study, we examine the response of Baikal littoral and sublittoral amphipod species to artificial lighting of varying intensity and spectral composition. In the experiments, amphipods were exposed to warm and white light at three different intensity ranges (5–15, 20–35, and 80–100 lx), as well as blue and red light. As a result, it was found that the reaction of Baikal amphipods to different lighting conditions was species-specific and dependent on the spectral composition of the light more so than the intensity of the light. In particular, white LED light generally repulsed E. cyaneus, but tended to attract A. godlevskii. P. cancelloides, and G. fasciatus, suggesting that white LED light may have a greater negative impact on wildlife than warm LED light. Generally, artificial light influences the behavior of Baikal amphipods, and an increase in light pollution on Lake Baikal may lead to changes in the littoral community in certain areas of the lake subject to pollution.

Light pollution can affect various groups of aquatic organisms. This effect will vary depending on the color temperature of the artificial lighting. However, at the moment, the issue of adaptation of organisms to light pollution and the influence of different color temperatures on them has not been well-studied. In this study, we decided to conduct a series of experiments with individuals of the amphipod Gmelinoides fasciatus from two populations and find out how individuals adapted to light pollution. The first group of individuals is from the population in Lake Baikal (Bolshie Koty Bay), and the second group is from the population in the Angara River (within the city of Irkutsk). The second population is significantly affected by light pollution. Since the middle of the last century, there has been an artificial barrier between these populations in the form of a hydroelectric power station. The experiments showed that G. fasciatus individuals developed different behavioral strategies in relation to artificial lighting with different color temperatures. In warm light, individuals tend to move to a shaded area, while in cold light, individuals may be attracted to artificial lighting, but only in small groups. These identified patterns may likely find practical use.

In this study, we present a list of crustaceans traced in plankton of the southern basin Lake Baikal in addition to some details regarding ecological peculiarities of the only known freshwater pelagic amphipod Macrohectopus branickii. The amphipod is an active predator among major parts of the Lake Baikal food chain. Its role in the lake’s ecosystem is similar to that of Antarctic krill and mysids in Europe and North America water bodies. As an active swimmer, M. branickii performs daily vertical migrations. Besides, the species also has horizontal migrations and migrating swarms, including time during breeding period, that hamper species studies. We were interested in clarify some features of the species ecology. As a material we used samples obtained in the 0 to 250 m water layer with a plankton Juday net every 7 to 10 days from 2013 until 2018 as a part of long-term ecological monitoring project of Lake Baikal pelagial. Sampling was conducted in the southern part of the lake off the shore of Bolshie Koty Village. The results showed the presence of one peak of young during breeding period, which is at its maximum in May. The maximum of the 1 to 6 mm group containing young individuals and males occurs in July, and during the same period, a slight increase in immature females in comparison with the first group can also be seen. This finding might be directly linked to the warming trend in Lake Baikal.

Light pollution is becoming more widespread every year, accompanied by the active use of LED lighting. Currently, the ability of organisms to adapt to this pollution and the potential impact of LED lighting of different color temperatures and intensities on organisms remains poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to find out how long-term light pollution affects the behavior of amphipods Gammarus lacustris, and to compare their locomotor activity under different lighting conditions, taking into account the factor of shelter from light. The response of individuals was compared in group and individual experiments under daylight, without light, warm and cold LED light up to 30 lx. The individuals were from two populations: the first is not exposed to light pollution (lake No. 14), while the second is affected (the Angara River within the city of Irkutsk). The locomotor activity of amphipods was assessed in daylight, without light, warm and cold light of 2–2.5 lx and 10–11 lx in the presence and absence of shelters from light. As a result of the experiments, adaptive changes in the reaction of G. lacustris to warm light were identified in individuals from the Angara River. The importance of LED light color temperature and warm light intensity in determining amphipod response to light was also confirmed. It was found that warm and cold light have different effects on the behavior of G. lacustris, and the presence of shelters from light can reduce the negative impact of light pollution in natural conditions.

Microplastic pollution of ecosystems is considered a modern problem. Freshwater ecosystems, despite the interest shown in their study, remain poorly understood. Lake Baikal (Russia) is one of the least studied freshwater ecosystems in this regard. This large lake is distinguished from others by its high level of biodiversity and clean drinking water. The aim of this study is a multi-matrix investigation of microplastic pollution in one of the lake’s bay. The following matrices are used: surface water, water column, sediment, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates, and fish, as well as ice and snow during the winter. The results show that certain locations exhibit high concentrations of microplastic particles. In some cases, this was due to the properties or characteristics of these locations (littoral zones near the water’s edge, macrophytes with mucus sheaths, ice and snow (potentially, the near-surface water layer after ice melt)), while in others, it was due to localized pollution (pier and ship mooring areas). An analysis of the polymer types of the detected microplastic particles reveals the presence of both common (polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, polystyrene, polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride) and rare (polyvinyl alcohol and alkyd resin). Moreover, in some locations, the latter two polymers predominate, a phenomenon rarely observed in other studies. Further research was recommended to focus on the chronic effects of microplastic particles on organisms associated with areas of elevated particle concentrations.