Extensive habitat loss and degradation have transformed the grasslands of North America into one of the continent’s most vulnerable ecosystems and have greatly imperiled the plants and animals that depend on them. Small mammal communities play a pivotal role in maintaining the health and function of grasslands, and managing small mammal populations is an important, though overlooked, part of grassland restoration and management. We identified habitat variables in restored tallgrass prairie patches that were most strongly associated with variation in small mammal abundance and community composition, with the goal of aiding management efforts to manipulate small mammal populations. We found that small mammal abundance at the local vegetation scale was negatively related both to litter depth and plant diversity. At the landscape scale, small mammal abundance was positively associated with the amount of water surrounding a patch, and negatively associated with the amount of grassland surrounding a patch. Variation in small mammal community composition largely was governed by differences in habitat structure at the landscape scale, rather than differences in vegetation structure at the local scale. We suggested that managers interested in influencing small mammal abundance in grasslands employ tools such as prescribed fire to decrease litter depth if increased small mammal abundance is desired, or increase plant diversity by sowing a high diversity of seeds to depress small mammal abundance.

Snakes are an integral component of grassland ecosystems, though their occurrence in high densities is often discouraged because of their role as nest predators of declining grassland birds. The effects of habitat structure on snake communities in grasslands remains poorly understood, hindering management efforts. We used 3 years of data from a series of restored grasslands in southern Illinois to examine how habitat structure across 3 spatial scales (local, patch, landscape) affected snake relative abundance, diversity, and species‐specific occupancy in grasslands. We found that snake community metrics were strongly and positively related to an increase in woody plant cover at the local (within‐patch) scale. Snake relative abundance was also positively related to an increase in grass cover and a decrease in forb cover, though our occupancy results suggest that this was primarily driven by an increase in black kingsnakes ( Lampropeltis nigra ). At the patch scale, relative abundance and diversity of snakes were both positively related to the proportion of patch edge composed of roads. Habitat structure at the landscape scale had the smallest impact on snakes in this study, though the proportion of trees in the landscape was positively related to snake diversity. We suggest that managers and conservationists interested in manipulating snake abundance in grasslands focus on within‐patch vegetation structure and composition. Decreasing woody cover in grasslands, or increasing the ratio of forbs to grasses, may reduce the presence of snakes, while maintaining a woody component could encourage both snake abundance and diversity.

Among the most rapidly declining birds in continental North America, grassland birds evolved with American bison (Bison bison) until bison nearly became extinct due to overhunting. Bison populations have subsequently rebounded due to reintroductions on conservation lands, but the impacts of bison on grassland nesting birds remain largely unknown. We investigated how bison reintroduction, together with other land management and climate factors, affected breeding populations of a grassland bird species of conservation concern, the Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus). We quantified population changes in Bobolinks over an 18-year period in conservation grasslands where bison were reintroduced, compared with adjacent grasslands grazed by cattle and where hay was harvested after the bird breeding season. Four years after bison reintroduction, the bison population in the study area had doubled, while Bobolink abundance declined 62% and productivity declined 84%. Our findings suggest that bison reintroduction as a conservation strategy may be counterproductive in grassland fragments where overgrazing, trampling, and other negative impacts drive declines in grassland breeding birds. Where bird conservation is an objective, small grassland reserves may therefore be inappropriate sites for bison reintroduction. To maximize conservation benefits to birds, land managers should prioritize protecting grassland birds from disturbance during the bird breeding season.

As tropical forests are frequently impacted by human disturbance, forests in various stages of disturbance recovery are increasingly important for maintaining biodiversity. However, much remains unclear regarding the impacts of prior disturbance intensity on wildlife in regenerating forests. Here, we used mist net capture data to compare bird communities in three tropical forest habitats representing various disturbance intensities: undisturbed primary forest, selectively logged forest (low disturbance), and secondary forest regenerating on abandoned agricultural fields (high disturbance). We found that after a 19-year recovery period, low-disturbance sites contained similar bird communities to undisturbed sites. High-disturbance sites, however, had lower species richness and distinct bird communities, with fewer insectivores and more nectarivores than other sites. Structural equation models revealed that the impacts of disturbance intensity on bird communities were partially explained by changes in vegetation structure: ant-following insectivore abundance declined with disturbance intensity as ground cover vegetation increased, and nectarivore abundance increased with disturbance intensity as tree density decreased. Our results suggest that selectively logged forests can regain pre-disturbance bird diversity and vegetation structure within two decades, provided that they are protected from further disturbance and located near source species pools. Increasing tree density and decreasing ground-level vegetation in secondary forests may improve these areas as habitats for forest-interior birds.

Grassland birds are the most rapidly declining bird guild in North America, largely due to extensive habitat loss and fragmentation. Because many grassland bird species have different habitat preferences, managing grasslands to provide habitat for a range of species can be a challenge. We used four years of data from southern Illinois, USA grasslands to estimate the influence of prescribed fire and habitat structure on nest survival, nest density, and abundance of three grassland bird species with different habitat preferences: Dickcissel (Spiza americana), Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla), and Common Yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas). We found that Dickcissels exhibited the strongest response to prescribed fire, as nest density and nest survival both increased after previously undisturbed grasslands were burned. Fire may have also benefitted Common Yellowthroats and Field Sparrows by reducing woody cover and increasing bare ground, both of which were characteristics associated with nest survival for these birds. Dickcissel abundance was positively related to plant diversity within a grassland and agriculture in the surrounding landscape (within 400 m of a grassland patch), and negatively related to edge-interior ratio. Field Sparrows demonstrated a positive association with woody cover and proximity to forests. Common Yellowthroats were associated with tall vegetation and agriculture in the surrounding landscape. Both Field Sparrows and Common Yellowthroats associated positively with habitat characteristics that reduced nest survival, suggesting potential adaptive mismatches. Our results suggest that periodic prescribed fire, increased plant diversity, and larger patch size may simultaneously benefit a broad variety of grassland bird species with different habitat preferences.