Background: After two decades from its introduction in the lateral skull base paraganglioma surgery, the indications and results of preoperative internal carotid artery stenting should be critically assessed. Materials and Methods: Monocentric retrospective study on 26 patients affected by head and neck paragangliomas (19 tympanojugular paragangliomas, 4 carotid body paragangliomas, 3 vagal paragangliomas) preoperatively treated with internal carotid artery stents between 2008 and 2023. The preoperative findings, the intraoperative complications and the final surgical results were analyzed. Results: The stent complication rate was less than 3.1%. Self-expanding highly flexible intracranial nitinol stents were applied. In all cases, it was possible to completely mobilize the internal carotid artery and perform a vascular dissection of the tumor. Gross total tumor resection was possible in 85% of cases. The median follow up was 7.83 y (SD +/− 3.93 y). No local recurrence was observed. Conclusions: The preoperative vascular stent facilitates tumor dissection from the internal carotid artery without risk of vascular damage, helping the surgeon to achieve surgical radicality. The vascular stent is indicated in the case of revision surgeries, circumferential involvement of the vessel and in cases with non-insufficient intracerebral crossflow. Procedural complications, temporary antiplatelet therapy and delay of surgery are the limitations of the procedure.

Objectives: The aim was to analyze the long‐term hearing results after simultaneous microsurgical extirpation via enlarged cochleostomy and cochlear implantation in intracochlear schwannoma as compared with non‐tumor single‐side deafness patients.Methods: Microsurgical extirpation via enlarged cochleostomy with simultaneous cochlear implantation was performed in 15 cases of intracochlear schwannoma between 2014 and 2021. Speech recognition tests in German language and impedance performances were collected over 36 months of observation and compared with an internal cohort of 52 age matched non‐tumor single‐side deafness patients. Retrospective cohort study in a tertiary referral center.Results: The surgery proved feasible and uneventful in all cases. In the case of intracochlear schwannoma, the hearing rehabilitation results were highly satisfactory and comparable to those of the non‐tumor single‐side deafness cohort. The speech recognition performance improved steadily in the first 12 months; afterward, it remained stable, providing indirect evidence against tumor recurrence during the follow‐up. One patient required implant revision surgery related to device failure, but no recurrence was registered in the 36 months of observation.Conclusions: Cochlear implantation is the strategy of choice for hearing rehabilitation in case of intracochlear schwannomas in the long term. In particular, the combination of tumor extirpation via cochleostomy with a cochlear implantation in the same surgical time offers a viable therapy for intracochlear schwannoma, granting a sufficient degree of radicality without compromising the cochlear integrity. This technique allows for revision surgery if required.Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:1854–1860, 2024

Background/Objectives: The diagnosis of vestibular migraine (VM) and Meniere’s disease (MD) is based mainly on clinical criteria. The aim of this study is to systematically review and investigate the potential role of the video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) in the differential diagnosis between VM and MD. Methods: A systematic review of the English-language literature was conducted, including studies from database inception to November 2023, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane Database and Scopus were reviewed. The review included studies involving adult patients diagnosed with VM, MD, or healthy control individuals who underwent vHIT and reported data on vHIT abnormalities, gain, and refixation saccades. The AXIS tool was applied for risk of bias assessment in all cross-sectional studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to compare vHIT gains between individuals with VM and those with MD. Results: Eleven cross-sectional observational studies with a case–control comparison design were included, comprising a total of 362 patients with VM, 307 patients with MD, and 135 healthy control subjects. All studies applied the same diagnostic criteria for VM; however, varying criteria were used for the diagnosis of MD. Four studies evaluated the duration of vestibular symptoms, two assessed migraine duration, and six provided a rationale for excluding individuals with overlapping VM and MD diagnoses. Criteria for defining an abnormal vHIT result were specified in six studies. Seven studies reported vHIT gain values for the lateral semicircular canal, while eight presented data on saccade incidence and characteristics. Additionally, four studies were included in the meta-analysis, which yielded a mean difference in the vHIT gain of −0.0203 (95% CI: −0.0789 to 0.0383; p = 0.4968), indicating no statistically significant difference between patients with VM and those with MD. Conclusions: In this review, vHIT gain did not differ significantly between VM and MD groups, suggesting that vHIT gain alone has limited utility in their differential diagnosis. Combined saccade patterns may still prove clinically useful as more robust and consistent data become available.

Nice narrative review, clear-cut, with The author is unbiased towards conservative treatments and surgical ones, giving a clear-cut overview of the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. The conclusion section is solid and offers worthy rec...