Background: Feedback is a pivotal instrument for learning and performance enhancement in medical and surgical training. Its established importance for resident development, aiming for highly qualified patient care, faces delivery and utilisation challenges, shifting focus to active learner reception. A critical gap exists in understanding surgical residents' perceptions of this essential process. Objective: This study aims to systematically identify and map available data regarding surgical residents' feedback perceptions during training, thoroughly analysing findings and delineating existing knowledge gaps. Methods: Following the Arksey and O'Malley and JBI methodology, a comprehensive search across Medline, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources (ROAD), Academic Search Premier (ASP), BioMed Central Open Access (BMC) and Wiley–Blackwell (Wiley) included studies on surgical residents' feedback perceptions (attitudes, experiences, values, beliefs, satisfaction and reported impact). Data charting involved both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Results: Twelve articles (2017–2024), predominantly United States‐based, were included. Residents consistently valued feedback for development and confidence, preferring immediate, verbal and face‐to‐face delivery, ideally during or directly following a procedure. Common concerns included low frequency, lack of specificity or explicit labelling and delayed provision leading to perceived irrelevance. Influential factors encompassed timing, the learning environment, source credibility (senior residents often preferred) and preceptor personal traits. Critically, the direct impact on learning progress and skill development was often underexamined. Conclusion: The current evidence based on surgical residents' feedback perceptions is limited by methodological heterogeneity, reliance on retrospective designs and insufficient direct measurement of its actual impact. Resident–preceptor perception discrepancies persist, alongside inadequate detail on feedback characteristics. Thus, standardised, comprehensive and impact‐focused research is critically needed to enhance surgical training feedback practices, ultimately contributing to improved patient care. Trial Registration: Not applicable

Background: Learning style is a biologically and developmentally imposed configuration of personal characteristics that makes the same teaching method effective for some and ineffective for others. Studies support a relationship between learning style and career choice, resulting in learning style patterns observed in distinct types of residency programs, which can also be applied to general surgery, from medical school to the latest stages of training. The methodologies, populations, and contexts of the few studies pertinent to the matter are very different from one another, and a scoping review on this theme will unequivocally enhance and organize what is already known. Objective: The goal of this study is to identify and map out data from studies that report on learning styles in medical students, surgical residents, medical staff, and surgical teachers. Methods: The search strategy was performed on September 25, 2023, by a librarian and digital search strategy expert, through the descriptors “learning, style” and “surgery.” The databases consulted were Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and PubMed through descriptors and their synonyms, according to MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Of the 213 articles found, 135 articles remained after the exclusion of duplicates. The remaining 78 articles were analyzed by 3 of the researchers independently. A total of 27 articles were selected, and 2 articles were excluded because the full article was not found. Results: A total of 25 articles were included in the review. A total of 96% (n=24) of the articles used cognitive theories as their theoretical basis. Regarding learning style instruments, 36% (n=9) articles used the visual, aural, read, and kinesthetic learning method instrument, and 40% (n=10) articles chose Kolb’s learning style inventory. The papers concentrate especially on the 2010s, and most of them are from North America (16/25, 64%) or Europe (6/25, 24%). The smallest study had 15 participants and the biggest had 1549 participants. The included studies primarily focused on surgical residents (21/25, 84%), with fewer targeting faculty and staff (9/25, 36%). The primary objectives of the studies were to investigate the relationship between learning styles and performance (15/25, 60%), gender differences (7/25, 28%), changes over time (4/25, 16%), and motivation (3/25, 12%). Conclusions: This scoping review reveals a limited and geographically concentrated body of research on learning styles in surgery education, primarily focusing on surgical residents and using Kolb’s learning style inventory and visual, aural, read, and kinesthetic learning method instruments. Considerable gaps exist regarding geographical diversity and the study of medical staff and faculty. These findings underscore the need for future research with a broader scope to better inform educational strategies in surgery.

Background: Nursing students face unique challenges during their university education, making them vulnerable to mental health problems. Psychological resilience has been identified as a protective factor against these issues. However, previous reviews have identified gaps in the literature on resilience and mental health among nursing students. Objectives: This scoping review aims to identify and map studies on psychological resilience and mental health in undergraduate nursing students, synthesize current evidence on their relationship, identify interventions for enhancing resilience, and highlight gaps in the existing literature. Eligibility criteria: Studies published between January 2019 and April 2024 in English, Portuguese, and Spanish addressing resilience and mental health in undergraduate nursing students will be included. Primary studies, secondary studies, clinical guidelines, and grey literature will be considered. Sources of evidence: Searches will be conducted in multiple databases including EMBASE, ERIC, PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, DOAJ, ELSEVIER, EMERALD, and WILEY ONLINE LIBRARY. Grey literature sources will also be searched. Charting methods: Data will be extracted using a standardized form and synthesized narratively. Thematic analysis will be conducted using MAXQDA software ((Verbi GmbH, 24 version, 2023). Quantitative summaries, visual mapping, subgroup analyses, and trend analyses will be performed where appropriate. Results: As this is a protocol, results are not yet available. The review will present a comprehensive map of the current literature on psychological resilience and mental health in nursing students, including identified interventions and research gaps. Conclusions: This scoping review will provide valuable insights to guide curriculum development, support services, and policy-making in nursing education. The findings may support actions to strengthen resilience and prevent mental health problems among future nursing professionals.

Background: Feedback is an essential tool for learning and improving performance in any sphere of education, including training of resident physicians. The learner’s perception of the feedback they receive is extremely relevant to their learning progress, which must aim at providing qualified care for patients. Studies pertinent to the matter differ substantially with respect to methodology, population, context, and objective, which makes it even more difficult to achieve a clear understanding of the topic. A scoping review on this theme will unequivocally enhance and organize what is already known. Objective: The aim of this study is to identify and map out data from studies that report surgical residents’ perception of the feedback received during their education. Methods: The review will consider studies on the feedback perception of resident physicians of any surgical specialty and age group, attending any year of residency, regardless of the type of feedback given and the way the perceptions were measured. Primary studies published in English, Spanish, and Portuguese since 2017 will be considered. The search will be carried out in 6 databases and reference lists will also be searched for additional studies. Duplicates will be removed, and 2 independent reviewers will screen the selected studies’ titles, abstracts, and full texts. Data extraction will be performed through a tool developed by the researchers. Descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis (content analysis) will be used to analyze the data. A summary of the results will be presented in the form of diagrams, narratives, and tables. Results: The findings of this scoping review were submitted to an indexed journal in July 2024, currently awaiting reviewer approval. The search was executed on March 15, 2024, and resulted in 588 articles. After the exclusion of the duplicate articles and those that did not meet the eligibility criteria as well as the inclusion of articles through a manual search, 13 articles were included in the review. Conclusions: Conducting a scoping review is the best way to map what is known about a subject. By focusing on the feedback perception more than the feedback itself, the results of this study will surely contribute to gaining a deeper understanding of how to proceed to enhance internal feedback and surgical residents’ learning progress. Trial Registration: Open Science Framework yexb; https://osf.io/yexkb. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/56727

Background: Learning styles are biological and developmental configurations of personal characteristics that make the same teaching method effective for some and ineffective for others. Studies support a relationship between learning style and career choices in medicine, resulting in learning style patterns being observed in different residency programs, including in general surgery, from medical school to the last stages of training. The methodologies, populations, and contexts of the few studies pertinent to the matter are very different from one another, and a scoping review on this theme will enhance and organize what is already known. Objective: The goal of this study is to identify and map out data from studies on the learning styles of medical students, surgical residents, medical staff, and surgical teachers. Methods: The review will consider studies on the learning styles of medical students in a clinical cycle or internship, surgical residents with no restriction on year of residency, medical staff in general surgery, or general surgery’s medical faculty. Primary studies published in English, with no specific time frame, will be considered. The search will be carried out in four databases, and reference lists will be searched for additional studies. Duplicates will be removed, and two independent reviewers will screen the titles, abstracts, and full texts of the selected studies. Data collection will be performed using a tool developed by the researchers. A results summary will be presented with figures, narratives, and tables. A quantitative and qualitative analysis will be carried out and further results will be shared. Results: The search was funded on September 25, 2023. Data collection was performed in the two following months. Of the 213 articles found, 135 were excluded due to duplication. The remaining 78 articles will have their titles and abstracts analyzed by three of the researchers independently to select those that meet the eligibility criteria. This data is expected to be published in the first semester of 2025. Conclusions: Conducting a scoping review is the best way to map what is known about a subject. Understanding how students, residents, staff, and even teachers prefer to learn surgery is key to staying up to date and knowing how to best educate those pursuing a surgical career. Trial Registration: Open Science Framework 75ku4; https://osf.io/75ku4 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/57229

Background: Studies confirm a relationship between learning style and medical career choice in the learning style patterns observed in distinct types of residency programs. Such patterns can also be applied to general surgery, from medical school to the latest stages of training. Aligning teaching strategies with the predominant learning styles in surgical residency programs has the potential to make training more effective. Objective: This study aimed to determine the learning styles of general surgery residents and professors in a Brazilian teaching hospital and compare the results with the existing literature. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in a teaching hospital of a public university in Brazil. Thirty-four general surgery residents of any year of training and 30 professors participated in the study. Participants completed a sociodemographic survey and David Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory. This was used to classify participants into one of four distinct types of learners: accommodating, diverging, assimilating, and converging. The relationship between sociodemographic data and learning styles was analyzed using the Fisher test, adjusted using the Bonferroni method, and the effect size was measured using the Cramer V test. Results: The learning style distribution was similar in both groups, with 43,75% diverging, 42,18% accommodating, 10.93% assimilating, and 3.12% converging styles. A significant relationship was found between sex and learning style (P=.049) and between age and learning style for professors (P=.029). The effect sizes were strong (0.46) and very strong (0.506). Conclusions: The prevalence of learning styles among general surgery residents and professors at this Brazilian hospital differs from that observed in previous studies, with more diverging and accommodating learners and fewer converging learners, suggesting a shift in learning styles. Understanding learning styles is important for effective surgical training programs. Further research with larger and more diverse populations is needed to confirm these results and explore the factors contributing to the observed differences in learning styles.