Using hourly rain gauge data at more than 30,000 automatic weather stations in China, in conjunction with the Climate Precipitation Center Morphing (CMORPH) precipitation product for the 2008–2010 warm seasons (from May through September), we assess the capability of the probability density function–optimal interpolation (PDF-OI) methods in generating the daily, 0.25° × 0.25° and hourly, 0.1° × 0.1° merged precipitation products between gauge observations and the CMORPH product. We find that error correlation, error variances of gauge and satellite data, and matching strategy in the PDF-OI method are dependent on the spatial and temporal resolutions of the used data. Efforts to improve the parameters and matching strategy for the hourly and 0.1° × 0.1° product have been conducted. These improvements are not only suitable to a high-frequency depiction of no-rain events, but accurately describe the error structures of hourly gauge and satellite fields. The successive merged precipitation algorithm or product is called the original PDF-OI (Orig_PDF-OI) and the improved PDF-OI, respectively. The cross-validation results show that the improved method reduces systematic bias and random errors effectively compared with both the CMORPH precipitation and the Orig_PDF-OI. The improved merged precipitation product over China at hourly, 0.1° resolution is generated from 2008 to 2010. Compared with the Orig_PDF-OI, the improved product reduces the underestimation greatly and has smaller bias and root-mean-square error, and higher spatial correlation. The improved product can better capture some varying features of hourly precipitation in heavy weather events.

Through optimizing the daily precipitation climatology, a new high-resolution (0.25° × 0.25° lat./lon.) gridded daily precipitation analysis over Mainland China was developed based on the optimal interpolation (OI) method. This product, based on about 2400 gauge stations over Mainland China from 1955 to the present, is called the China Gauge-based Daily Precipitation Analysis (CGDPA). In this study, using independent precipitation observations as the benchmark, CGDPA and the Climate Prediction Center Unified gauge dataset (CPC_UNI) from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) are validated from May to September of 2008–2010 on a 0.5° × 0.5° lat./lon. grid. The CGDPA has smaller bias and root mean square error, and higher spatial correlation with the validation data than CPC_UNI. Further investigation indicates that this improvement is mainly owing to the larger number of gauges used in the CGDPA. The East Asia gauge analysis (EA_Gauge) is also introduced to comparatively evaluate the capabilities of monitoring precipitation events with different rainfall rates over Mainland China. CGDPA can capture more strong rainfall events while CPC_UNI and EA_Gauge tend to smooth the precipitation structure and miss more local strong rainfall events with precipitation larger than 25 mm day⁻¹ over Mainland China. The long-term precipitation time series described by the CGDPA and EA_Gauge agree very well while CPC_UNI substantially underestimates precipitation especially over the sparse-gauged regions and after 1982. CGDPA is thus suggested as a readily available input to applications over Mainland China, whenever possible.

Benefiting from the high spatiotemporal resolution and near-global coverage, satellite-based precipitation products are applied in many research fields. However, the applications of these products may be limited due to lack of information on the uncertainties. To facilitate applications of these products, it is crucial to quantify and document their error characteristics. In this study, four satellite-based precipitation products (TRMM-3B42, TRMM-3B42RT, CMORPH, GSMaP) were evaluated using gauge-based rainfall analysis based on a high-density gauge network throughout the Chinese Mainland during 2003–2006. To quantitatively evaluate satellite-based precipitation products, continuous (e.g., ME, RMSE, CC) and categorical (e.g., POD, FAR) verification statistics were used in this study. The results are as follows: (1) GSMaP and CMORPH underestimated precipitation (about −0.53 and −0.14 mm/day, respectively); TRMM-3B42RT overestimated precipitation (about 0.73 mm/day); TRMM-3B42, which is the only dataset corrected by gauges, had the best estimation of precipitation amongst all four products; (2) GSMaP, CMORPH and TRMM-3B42RT overestimated the frequency of low-intensity rainfall events; TRMM-3B42 underestimated the frequency of low-intensity rainfall events; GSMaP underestimated the frequency of high-intensity rainfall events; TRMM-3B42RT tended to overestimate the frequency of high-intensity rainfall events; TRMM-3B42 and CMORPH produced estimations of high-intensity rainfall frequency that best aligned with observations; (3) All four satellite-based precipitation products performed better in summer than in winter. They also had better performance over wet southern region than dry northern or high altitude regions. Overall, this study documented error characteristics of four satellite-based precipitation products over the Chinese Mainland. The results help to understand features of these datasets for users and improve algorithms for algorithm developers in the future.

Based on high-density gauge precipitation observations, high-resolution weather radar quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) and seamless satellite-based precipitation estimates, a 1-km experimental gauge-radar-satellite merged precipitation dataset has been developed using the proposed local gauge correction (LGC) and optimal interpolation (OI) merging strategies. First, hourly precipitation analyses from approximately 40,000 automatic weather stations at 0.01° resolution were used to correct bias in the radar QPE Group System (QPEGS), developed by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA) and the Climate Prediction Center Morphing (CMORPH) precipitation products. As precipitation events tend to have a more localized distribution at the hourly and 0.01° resolutions, three core parameters were improved using the OI method. (a) The spatial dependence of the error variance for radar QPE was accounted for over six sub-regions in China and is shown as a non-linear function of the gauge precipitation analysis. (b) The spatial dependence of error correlation for the radar QPE decreased exponentially with distance. (c) The error of the hourly gauge-based precipitation analysis was quantified as a function of the precipitation amount and the gauge network density, using the Monte Carlo method to randomly sample the gauge observations over the dense gauge network. The performance of the 1-km experimental gauge-radar-satellite merged precipitation dataset (named as China Merged Precipitation Analysis: CMPA_1km) was assessed at 6 h-temporal resolutions and 0.03° × 0.03° spatial resolution using precipitation observations from 208 independent hydrological stations as a reference. Compared with radar QPE and CMORPH, the CMPA-1km showed obviously better accuracy in all sub-regions and during all seasons. In contrast, gauge analysis and CMPA-1km shared similar accuracy, but the latter could estimate heavy precipitation more accurately than the former, as well as the latter has the advantage of seamless spatial coverage. However, the CMPA-1km exhibits larger uncertainty during the cold season compared to the warm season, which will need further improvement in future work. The downscaled bias-corrected 0.01° resolution CMORPH was employed to fill the gaps in regions, mainly in Western China and the Tibetan Plateau, where gauge and radar measurements are limited.