The rapid and disordered expansion of artificial marine aquaculture areas has caused severe ecological and environmental problems. Accurate monitoring of offshore aquaculture areas is urgent and significant in order to support the scientific and sustainable management and protection of coastal marine resources. Artificial intelligence provides a valuable tool to improve marine resource monitoring. Deep learning methods have been widely used for marine object detection, but You Only Look Once (YOLO) models have not been employed for offshore aquaculture area monitoring. This study therefore evaluated the capacity of two well-known YOLO models, YOLOv5 and YOLOv7, to detect offshore aquaculture areas based on different high-resolution optical remote sensing imagery. Compared with YOLOv7 based on a satellite dataset, YOLOv5 increased the Precision value by approximately 3.29% (to 95.33%), Recall value by 3.02% (to 93.02%), mAP_0.5 by 2.03% (to 96.22%), and F1 score by 2.65% (to 94.16%). Based on the Google Earth dataset, YOLOv5 and YOLOv7 showed similar results. We found that the spatial resolution could affect the deep learning models’ performances. We used the Real-ESRGAN method to enhance the spatial resolution of satellite dataset and investigated whether super-resolution (SR) methods improved the detection accuracy of the YOLO models. The results indicated that despite improving the image clarity and resolution, the SR methods negatively affected the performance of the YOLO models for offshore aquaculture object detection. This suggests that attention should be paid to the use of SR methods before the application of deep learning models for object detection using remote sensing imagery.

Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) constitute a core data source for Archeological Predictive Modeling. However, how quality differences among multi-source DEM propagate through complex models and subsequently affect predictive accuracy and geographic interpretation remains insufficiently understood. This study aims to develop an integrated evaluation framework that combines machine learning with SHAP-based interpretability analysis to systematically compare the suitability of mainstream open access DEM products for archeological site prediction. The results indicate that (1) in terms of vertical accuracy, Copernicus DEM and TanDEM-X achieved the best performance, with RMSE values of 2.19 m and 2.31 m, respectively, whereas ASTER exhibited the lowest accuracy (RMSE = 6.44 m) and exaggerated terrain. (2) Regarding model performance, Copernicus DEM-driven models demonstrated the highest robustness, achieving an AUC of 0.966 under the XGBoost algorithm. (3) Interpretability analysis revealed that different DEM products significantly reallocate the importance of key variables such as slope and the Topographic Wetness Index, potentially distorting scientific interpretations of ancient military defensive site-selection patterns. Copernicus DEM is recommended as a priority data source. Moreover, while pursuing higher spatial resolution, equal attention must be paid to vertical accuracy and consistency with geomorphological logic.