Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) constitute a core data source for Archeological Predictive Modeling. However, how quality differences among multi-source DEM propagate through complex models and subsequently affect predictive accuracy and geographic interpretation remains insufficiently understood. This study aims to develop an integrated evaluation framework that combines machine learning with SHAP-based interpretability analysis to systematically compare the suitability of mainstream open access DEM products for archeological site prediction. The results indicate that (1) in terms of vertical accuracy, Copernicus DEM and TanDEM-X achieved the best performance, with RMSE values of 2.19 m and 2.31 m, respectively, whereas ASTER exhibited the lowest accuracy (RMSE = 6.44 m) and exaggerated terrain. (2) Regarding model performance, Copernicus DEM-driven models demonstrated the highest robustness, achieving an AUC of 0.966 under the XGBoost algorithm. (3) Interpretability analysis revealed that different DEM products significantly reallocate the importance of key variables such as slope and the Topographic Wetness Index, potentially distorting scientific interpretations of ancient military defensive site-selection patterns. Copernicus DEM is recommended as a priority data source. Moreover, while pursuing higher spatial resolution, equal attention must be paid to vertical accuracy and consistency with geomorphological logic.