Zheng Liu

Zheng Liu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 October 2023 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TYTengxiang Yang
Tengxiang Yang
CJChengqian Jin
Chengqian Jin
YNYouliang Ni
Youliang Ni
ZLZheng Liu
Zheng Liu
MCMan Chen
Man Chen
Aiming at the demand by unmanned farms for unmanned operation in the entire process of field management, an unmanned plant protection robot for field management was developed based on a platform comprising a traditional high-clearance spray rod sprayer, integrated unmanned driving technology, image recognition technology, intelligent control technology, and precision operation technology. According to the agricultural machinery operation mode, agricultural machinery path planning, linear path tracking, and header path tracking algorithms were developed. Based on the overall structure and working principle of the chassis, the robot control system, steering control system, and operation control system were set. Based on the YOLOv5 image recognition algorithm, the crop–weed recognition model was developed. After 6000 rounds of training, the accuracy, recall, and mean average precision of the model were 87.7%, 84.5%, and 79.3%, respectively. Finally, a field experiment was carried out with the unmanned plant protection robot equipped with a complete system. Results show that the average lateral error of the robot is 0.036 m, the maximum lateral error is 0.2 m, the average root mean square error is 0.053 m, the average velocity error is 0.034 m/s, and the average root mean square error of velocity is 0.045 m/s when the robot works in a straight line. In weeding operations, the area ratio of weedy zones to field is 25%, which saves 75% of the herbicide compared to that dispensed in full spraying mode. The unmanned plant protection robot designed in this study effectively achieves machinery’s autonomous operation, providing valuable insights for research in unmanned farming and autonomous agricultural machinery.

12 February 2025 in Journal of Biosystems Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JWJn Wang
Jn Wang
CSChunli Shan
Chunli Shan
FGFuqiang Gou
Fuqiang Gou
ZQZhenjie Qian
Zhenjie Qian
YNYouliang Ni
Youliang Ni
CJChengqian Jin
Chengqian Jin

13 July 2024 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZLZheng Liu
Zheng Liu
TYTengxiang Yang
Tengxiang Yang
PLPanpan Li
Panpan Li
JWJn Wang
Jn Wang
JXJinshan Xu
Jinshan Xu
CJChengqian Jin
Chengqian Jin
To conveniently implement the online detection of grain moisture in combined harvesters and the address the influence of the no-load measurement baseline, thereby enhancing detection accuracy and measurement continuity, this study developed a differential grain moisture detection device. For its convenient installation and integration on combined harvesters, a single-pole plate measurement element with a 1.6 mm thick epoxy resin coated with a 2-ounce copper film was designed, and a grain moisture detection device was constructed based on the STM32F103 microprocessor (STMicroelectronics International NV, Geneva, Switzerland). To enhance the device’s interference resistance, a differential amplification measurement circuit integrated with high-frequency excitation was designed using a reference capacitance. To improve the resolution of the measurement circuit, Malab simulations were conducted at different excitation frequencies, ultimately selecting 30 kHz as the system’s excitation signal frequency. To validate the effectiveness of the measurement circuit, validity tests were performed on the constructed sensor, which showed that the sensor’s measurement voltage could effectively distinguish the moisture levels in grains, with a determination coefficient (R²) reaching 0.9978. To address the errors in moisture measurement caused by changes in grain temperature, an interaction experiment of the effect of moisture content and temperature on the measurement voltage was conducted using an integrated temperature sensor, resulting in the construction of a moisture content calculation model. Both the indoor static detection and field testing of the moisture detection device were conducted, indicating that the maximum average error in static measurements was 0.3%, with a maximum relative error of 0.47%, and the average relative error in field tests was ≤0.4%.

19 August 2025 in Journal of Biosystems Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JWJn Wang
Jn Wang
YNYouliang Ni
Youliang Ni
ZLZheng Liu
Zheng Liu
FGFuqiang Gou
Fuqiang Gou
ZQZhenjie Qian
Zhenjie Qian
CJChengqian Jin
Chengqian Jin