Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) is a potentially life-threatening pulmonary pathology which results in intra-alveolar hemorrhage secondary to disruption of the alveolar capillary basement membrane. Most commonly, these patients present with hemoptysis, hypoxemia and pulmonary infiltrates. Although rare, sevoflurane, an inhalational anesthetic used as a rapid induction agent for anesthesia may be implicated in the etiology of DAH. We report a case of a 21-year-old otherwise healthy male found to have postoperative diffuse alveolar hemorrhage secondary to sevoflurane inhalation. Thus far, only five documented cases describing sevoflurane induced diffuse alveolar hemorrhage have been described in the literature, with prior cases also showing a clear temporal association between sevoflurane administration and symptom onset. Although uncommon, we must take sevoflurane into consideration as a possible etiology of diffuse alveolar hemorrhage when encountering signs of respiratory distress and hemoptysis in postoperative patients.

Background/Objectives: This retrospective case series analyzed visual outcomes in patients with a prior history of implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation who underwent cataract extraction (CE). A secondary aim was to investigate the relationship between vault height and the rate of cataract development. Methods: Visual acuity and refraction measurements were collected after CE at one week, one month and six months. Vault height measurements were correlated to the time until symptomatic cataracts were removed. Results: A total of 44 eyes were analyzed at six months after CE with efficacy and safety indexes of 1.20 ± 1.11 and 1.50 ± 1.06, respectively. In addition, 70% of eyes had a post-operative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) within one line of pre-operative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Refractive predictability at six months demonstrated that 43% and 69% of eyes were within ±0.25 D and ±0.50 D of SEQ target, respectively. Astigmatism measured by refractive cylinder was ≤0.25 D in 17% and ≤0.50 D in 34% of eyes pre-operatively compared to 40% and 60% of eyes, respectively, at six months post-operatively. Vault heights one week after ICL (p < 0.0081) and one week before CE (p < 0.0154) demonstrated a positive linear regression with the time until CE. Conclusions: This sample population achieved favorable visual outcomes six months after CE, similar to six months after ICL implantation. Patients with a history of ICL implantation will similarly have a good visual prognosis after CE.

Gastrointestinal (GI) involvement in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s Disease (PD) has been widely recognized and supported in recent literature. Prospective and retrospective studies found non-motor symptoms within the GI, specifically constipation, precede cardinal signs and cognitive decline by almost 20 years. In 2002, Braak et al. were the first to propose that PD is a six-stage propagating neuropathological process originating from the GI tract (GIT). Aggregated α-synuclein (α-syn) protein from the GIT is pathognomonic for the development of PD. This article reviews the current literature from the past 10 years as well as original research found in PubMed on the combined effects of enteric glial cells and lectins on the development of Parkinson’s Disease. Studies have found that these aggregated and phosphorylated proteins gain access to the brain via retrograde transport through fast and slow fibers of intestinal neurons. Plant lectins, commonly found within plant-based diets, have been found to induce Leaky Gut Syndrome and can activate enteric glial cells, causing the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Oxidative stress on the enteric neurons, caused by a chronic neuro-inflammatory state, can cause a-syn aggregation and lead to Lewy Body formation, a hallmark finding in PD. Although the current literature provides a connection between the consumption of plant lectins and the pathophysiology of PD, further research is required to evaluate confounding variables such as food antigen mimicry and other harmful substances found in our diets.

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the visual outcomes and prognosis after cataract surgery in patients with prior history of Verisyse phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) implantation. Methods: A retrospective cohort study involving 215 Verisyse pIOL implantations and 17 explantations was conducted. The Verisyse pIOL was disenclaved and removed through a superior scleral tunnel incision. Cataract extraction with phacoemulsification was then performed through a temporal clear corneal incision. Results: An occurrence rate of 7.9% of eyes with cataract formation was found. Both uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected visual acuity (CDVA) three months after cataract surgery were significantly improved (0.24 ± 0.30 vs. 0.73 ± 0.48; p < 0.001 and 0.10 ± 0.14 vs. 0.30 ± 0.31; p = 0.004, respectively). The UDVA was 20/20 or better in 41% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 65% of eyes. The CDVA was 20/20 or better in 53% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 88% of eyes. The safety and efficacy indices were 1.96 ± 1.68 and 1.60 ± 1.36, respectively. Conclusions: Various complications including cataracts may develop in these patients. Verisyse pIOLs have a lower incidence of cataract formation and are more likely to lead to age-related cataracts rather than the anterior subcapsular cataracts commonly seen in implantable collamer lens (ICL) patients. Patients with a prior history of Verisyse pIOL can expect to have a good visual prognosis after cataract extraction.

: To compare large language models (LLMs) and human reviewers in the peer review process of manuscripts submitted to 3 ophthalmology-related journals. This retrospective study comprised 300 randomly selected manuscripts from 3 anonymized journals under 1 editor between June 2023 and July 2024. Comments from 2 LLMs (Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer [ChatGPT] 4o and Gemini) and human reviewers (324 ophthalmologists) were compared. LLMs were prompted to accept, accept with major or minor revisions, or reject each manuscript in addition to providing comments. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess the “favorability” of comments and compare manuscripts that were accepted or rejected by the editor. A 4-category quality assessment was used to compare the number of comments, detail/specificity, critical analysis, and literature support. Human reviewers rejected manuscripts more frequently (73.33% vs 2.00% ChatGPT and 2.00% Gemini; P < .001) and suggested major (22.67% vs 68.00% ChatGPT and 31.33% Gemini; P < .001) or minor revisions (3.33% vs 30.00% ChatGPT and 66.33% Gemini; P < .001) less often. Human reviewers gave more negative feedback for rejected manuscripts (−1.05 vs −0.02 ChatGPT and 0.24 Gemini; P < .015). ChatGPT repeated “novelty,” “sample size,” and “clarity” in 75%, 60%, and 50% of cases, respectively, while Gemini did so in 80%, 70%, and 65% of cases. Both lacked specificity, omitting line numbers and references. Although it is hoped that LLMs will one day be able to augment the role of peer reviewers, in their current state, LLMs should not be used for manuscript revision.