Background: The adoption of robotic bariatric surgery has increased dramatically over the last decade. While outcomes comparing bariatric and laparoscopic approaches are debated, little is known about patient factors responsible for the growing delivery of robotic surgery. A better understanding of these factors will help guide the planning of bariatric delivery and resource allocation. Methods: Data were extracted from the MBSAQIP registry from 2020 to 2021. The patient population was organized into primary robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus those who underwent laparoscopic procedures. Bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression modeling were conducted to characterize cohort differences and identify independent patient predictors of robotic selection. Results: Of 318,151, 65,951 (20.7%) underwent robot-assisted surgery. Patients undergoing robotic procedures were older (43.4 ± 11.8 vs. 43.1 ± 11.8; p < 0.001) and had higher body mass index (BMI; 45.4 ± 7.9 vs. 45.0 ± 7.6; p < 0.001). Robotic cases had higher rates of medical comorbidities, including sleep apnea, hyperlipidemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and diabetes mellitus. Robotic cases were more likely to undergo RYGB (27.4% vs. 26.4%; p < 0.001). Robotic patients had higher rates of numerous complications, including bleed, reoperation, and reintervention, resulting in higher serious complication rates on multivariate analysis. Independent predictors of robotic selection included increased BMI (aOR 1.02), female sex (aOR 1.04), GERD (aOR 1.12), metabolic dysfunction, RYGB (aOR 1.08), black racial status (aOR 1.11), and lower albumin (aOR 0.84). Conclusions: After adjusting for comorbidities, patients with greater metabolic comorbidities, black racial status, and those undergoing RYGB were more likely to receive robotic surgery. A more comprehensive understanding of patient factors fueling the adoption of robotic delivery, as well as those expected to benefit most, is needed to better guide healthcare resources as the landscape of bariatric surgery continues to evolve.

Background/Objectives: Efforts to preoperatively risk stratify and optimize patients before liver resection allow for improvements in postoperative outcomes, with hypoalbuminemia being increasingly researched as a surrogate for nutrition, overall health and functional status. Given the paucity of studies examining the relationship between hypoalbuminemia and liver resection, this study aims to determine the impact of hypoalbuminemia on outcomes following liver resections using a large multicenter database. Methods: The American College of Surgeons–National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2017–2021) database was used to extract the data of patients who underwent a hepatic resection. Two cohorts were defined; those with hypoalbuminemia (HA; <3.0 g/L) and those with normal albumin levels (≥3.0 g/L). Both baseline characteristics and 30-day postoperative complication rates were compared between the two cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the independent effect of HA on various outcomes. Area under curve–receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) curves were used to identify optimal albumin thresholds for both serious complications and mortality. Results: We evaluated 26,394 patients who underwent liver resections, with 1347 (5.1%) having preoperative HA. The HA patients were older (62.3 vs. 59.8; p < 0.001) and more likely to be of an ASA class ≥ 4 (13.0% vs. 6.5%; p < 0.001). The patients with HA had significantly more complications such as an increased length of stay, readmission, reoperation, sepsis, surgical site infection, bile leak, and need for transfusion. After controlling for demographics and comorbidities, HA remained a significant independent predictor associated with both 30-day serious complication rates (aOR 2.93 [CI 95% 2.36–3.65, p < 0.001]) and mortality (aOR 2.15 [CI 95% 1.38–3.36, p = 0.001]). The optimal cut-off for albumin with respect to predicting serious complications was 4.0 g/dL (sensitivity 59.1%, specificity 56.8%, AUC-ROC 0.61) and 3.8 g/dL (sensitivity 56.6%, specificity 68.3%, AUC-ROC 0.67) for mortality. Conclusions: In this large, retrospective database analysis, preoperative HA was significantly associated with 30-day morbidity and mortality rates following hepatic resection. Preoperative albumin may serve as a useful marker for risk stratification in conjunction with pre-existing calculators. Future studies evaluating the risk mitigation impact of nutrition and exercise prehabilitation in these patients and its capacity to modify hypoalbuminemia would be beneficial.

The benefits of MIS in older adults are conflicting. This study evaluates demographics and early outcomes, for older patients (≥75) undergoing minimally invasive (MIS) versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). We categorized elderly patients who underwent PD from 2017 to 2021 NSQIP databases by surgical approach (open vs MIS). Baseline characteristics were examined with bivariate analysis, and multivariate logistic regression assessed the independent effect of minimally invasive surgery on 30-day serious complications and mortality. Amongst 4137 patients, 150 (3.63 %) underwent MIS PD. Patients demographics were similar. Open cohorts were older (79.1 vs 78.4 years; p = 0.011) with greater tumor invasion (36.6 % vs. 27.0 %; p = 0.018). MIS had longer operations (133.1 vs 119.6 min; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that MIS approach was associated with increased serious complications (OR 2.21; p < 0.001), but not mortality (OR 2.11; p = 0.173). Post hoc analysis excluding cases converted to open demonstrated no difference in serious complications (OR 1.94; p = 0.070) or mortality (OR 3.58; p = 0.094). PSM analysis estimated a 14.7 % higher rate of serious complications in MIS but similar mortality (p = 0.291). MIS PD uptake in elderly patients remains limited, with early findings indicating longer operations and higher complications. Further research on patient selection differences, technique modifications, and center expertise is required.