Takotsubo syndrome (TTS), also known as the broken-heart syndrome, is a reversible condition typically observed in female patients presenting for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Despite its increasing incidence, TTS often remains undiagnosed due to its overlap with ACS. The pathophysiology of TTS is complex and involves factors such as coronary vasospasm, microcirculatory dysfunction, increased catecholamine levels, and overactivity of the sympathetic nervous system. Diagnosing TTS requires a comprehensive approach, starting with clinical suspicion and progressing to both non-invasive and invasive multimodal tests guided by a specific diagnostic algorithm. Management of TTS should be personalized, considering potential complications, the presence or absence of coronary artery disease (CAD), diagnostic test results, and the patient’s clinical course. The current data primarily derive from case series, retrospective analyses, prospective registries, and expert opinions. In recent years, there has been growing recognition of gender differences in the pathophysiology, presentation, and outcomes of TTS. This review provides an updated overview of gender disparities, highlighting the importance of tailored diagnostic and management strategies.

The pandemic changed the type of patients. The concept of “patient at the center” became concrete. The execution of simple consultancy was overcome to create effective collaboration and fruitful exchanges between specialists. The “Heart Team” model is on increasing affirmation. The TEAM-BASED approach in the cardiology field is successfully used in patients suffering from ischemic heart disease and valvulopathies for the choice of possible treatments. Degenerative type Sao is the most frequent valvulopathy among the valvulopathies in Western countries and its incidence is correlated with age. In high-risk patients, percutaneous valve replacement (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) is the most valid therapeutic option. The implantation of biological prostheses raises the problem of both degeneration and dysfunction of the prosthesis itself over time in subjects of advanced age and with comorbidities. In this scenario, valve-in-valve (VinV) is a valid therapeutic alternative in high-risk patients. A clinical case of aortic prosthetic degeneration, as an outcome of endocarditis, treated with VinV is presented. The therapeutic decision was made by an “Electronic Heart Team” which represents a further evolution of the treatment pathways and reduces the distance between the specialists in “Hub” Centers and the “Spoke” center. Summary: The advent of the pandemic caused active collaboration and fruitful discussions among medical specialists. As a matter of fact, a shift from a simple consultation to the establishment of a proper “Heart Team” model occurred and the concept of “patient at the center” arose. TEAM-BASED approaches in cardiology are being successfully used as possible treatments in patients suffering from ischemic heart disease and valvulopathies. Degenerative type Sao is the most frequent valvulopathy in Western countries and its incidence is correlated with age. In high-risk patients, percutaneous valve replacement (TAVI) is the most viable treatment option. However, in subjects of advanced age, with comorbidities, the implantation of biological prostheses is associated with the degeneration and dysfunction of the prosthesis itself over time. In this scenario, Valve-in-valve (VinV) is a viable therapeutic alternative in high-risk patients. A clinical case of aortic prosthetic degeneration, as an outcome of endocarditis, that was treated with VinV is presented. The decision on VinV was made by an “Electronic Heart Team” which represents a further evolution of care pathways to reduce the distance between the “Hub” Centers and the specialist at the “Spoke” center.

Background/Objectives: Heart failure (HF) is associated with substantial morbidity, impaired quality of life (QOL), and reduced functional capacity. In selected patients with symptomatic HF despite Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT), Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) may be a therapeutic option. Identifying patients most likely to benefit from CCM remains an unmet need. The Predict-CCM study aims to evaluate long-term clinical and objective outcomes after CCM therapy and to assess the predictive value of pre-implant low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (LDDSE). Methods and Results: Predict-CCM is an independent, non-profit, multicenter, observational cohort study conducted in Italy, with both retrospective and prospective enrollment. The primary endpoint is the proportion of subjects with a clinical response to CCM at 12 months, defined as a ≥1-class reduction in NYHA class. Secondary clinical endpoints include reductions in HF-related hospitalizations, changes in QOL assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), and changes in NT-proBNP levels from baseline to follow-up. Outcomes will be evaluated in the overall cohort and in two subcohorts stratified by pre-implant LDDSE response: (1) reduction in left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) ≥ 15% (DeltaLVESV ≥ 15%); and (2) reduction in LVESV < 15% (DeltaLVESV < 15%). Assuming a 70% clinical response rate at 12 months, the estimated sample size is 120 patients. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee in March 2025. Enrollment will continue for 2 years, with a 12-month follow-up period after implant for each subject. Conclusions: This study may provide new criteria for patient selection and outcome assessment in CCM therapy. Left ventricular contractile reserve assessed by stress echocardiography may be a promising predictor of response.