Urbano Gomes Pinto de Abreu

Dr. Urbano Gomes Pinto de Abreu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 March 2020 in Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VWVanessa Aparecida de Moraes Weber
Vanessa Aparecida de Moraes Weber
FWFABRICIO De Lima WEBER
FABRICIO De Lima WEBER
RGRodrigo da Costa Gomes
Rodrigo da Costa Gomes
AOAdair da Silva Oliveira
Adair da Silva Oliveira
GMGeazy Vilharva Menezes
Geazy Vilharva Menezes
Hemerson PistoriHemerson Pistori
Hemerson Pistori
The objective with this study was to analyze the body measurements of Girolando cattle, as well as measurements extracted from their images, to generate a model to understand which measures further explain the cattle body weight. Therefore, the experiment physically measured 34 Girolando cattle (two males and 32 females), for the following traits: heart girth (HG P), circumference of the abdomen, body length, occipito-ischial length, wither height, and hip height. In addition, images of the dorsum and the body lateral area of these animals allowed measurements of hip width (HW I), body length, tail distance to the neck, dorsum area (DA I), dorsum perimeter, wither height, hip height, body lateral area, perimeter of the lateral area, and rib height. The measurements extracted from the images were subjected to the stepwise regression method and regression-based machine learning algorithms. The HG p was the physical measure with stronger positive correlation with respect to body weight. In the stepwise method, the final model generated R² of 0.70 and RMSE of 42.52 kg and the equation: WEIGHT (kg) = 6.15421 * HW I (cm) + 0.01929 * DA I (cm 2) + 70.8388. The linear regression and SVM algorithms obtained the best results, followed by discretization regression with random forests. The set of rules presented in this study can be recommended for estimating body weight in Girolando cattle, at a correlation coefficient of 0.71, by measurements of hip width and dorsum area, both extracted from cattle images.

9 April 2020 in Environment Systems and Decisions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DBDeborah Bambil
Deborah Bambil
Hemerson PistoriHemerson Pistori
Hemerson Pistori
FBFrancielli Bao
Francielli Bao
VWVanessa Weber
Vanessa Weber
FAFlávio Alves
Flávio Alves
IBIeda Maria Bortolotto
Ieda Maria Bortolotto

1 January 2019 in Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RGRenato L. Guerreiro
Renato L. Guerreiro
Ivan BergierIvan Bergier
Ivan Bergier
MMMichael M. McGlue
Michael M. McGlue
LWLucas V. Warren
Lucas V. Warren
UAUrbano Gomes Pinto de Abreu
Urbano Gomes Pinto de Abreu
MAMario Luis Assine
Mario Luis Assine

1 August 2017 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSandra Santos
Sandra Santos
HLHelano Póvoas Lima
Helano Póvoas Lima
SMSilvia M.F.S. Massruhá
Silvia M.F.S. Massruhá
UAUrbano Gomes Pinto de Abreu
Urbano Gomes Pinto de Abreu
WTWalfrido M. Tomás
Walfrido M. Tomás
LPLuiz Alberto Pellegrin
Luiz Alberto Pellegrin

14 August 2024 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMariana de Aragao Pereira
Mariana de Aragao Pereira
DBDavi J. Bungenstab
Davi J. Bungenstab
VEValeria P. B. Euclides
Valeria P. B. Euclides
GMGUILHERME CUNHA MALAFAIA
GUILHERME CUNHA MALAFAIA
PBPaulo Henrique Biscola
Paulo Henrique Biscola
VSVanessa Felipe de Souza
Vanessa Felipe de Souza
Brazil is the second largest beef producer and a leading exporter, contributing to some 3000 t CWE in global markets (27.7% of market share). The sector has experienced substantial development, but yields remain far below potential, and there are growing concerns regarding land use change and greenhouse gas emissions. The need for sustainable technologies, such as sound pasture management and integrated farming systems, is evident, but adoption may be low amongst farmers unable to keep up with technological advances. This article describes the historical developments of Brazilian beef farming towards sustainability and discusses possible socioenvironmental outcomes. We combined an extensive literature review, public data, and our own insights as senior researchers to achieve that. The trajectory shown here evidenced the technological intensification of Brazilian beef farming, with strong support of public policies for decarbonizing agriculture. Nonetheless, the pace of this transition may affect small to medium farmers with limited access to information, technologies, and credit. Our recommendations involve a broad program of technical assistance and training on sustainable technologies, including financial and digital literacy. A novel approach to financing farmers is suggested to support a sustainable and inclusive transition in beef farming in Brazil.

1 June 2015 in Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EGEliane Gonçalves Gomes
Eliane Gonçalves Gomes
UAUrbano Gomes Pinto de Abreu
Urbano Gomes Pinto de Abreu
JMJoão Carlos Palazzo de Mello
João Carlos Palazzo de Mello
TCThiago Bernardino de Carvalho
Thiago Bernardino de Carvalho
SZSergio de Zen
Sergio de Zen
This study evaluated the performance of 21 beef cattle modal production systems that conduct only the raising phase. These production systems were developed in 21 municipalities in seven Brazilian states. We used two different DEA BCC models, corresponding to different points of view. Firstly we used an economic model that measured the ability of a production system to generate revenue with the preservation of native forest, using labor, capital, and current spending as inputs. The socio-environmental approach, corresponding to the second BCC model, uses the production factor labor as an output. In that model our interest was to assess whether the capital costs generate economic, environmental, and social benefits. Weight restrictions were imposed on the output variables of each model to explain the proposed viewpoints and to avoid inconsistent results. The results pointed out sources of inefficiency in terms of labor with low qualification, and use of bulls of questionable quality, factors that are common in extensive systems. These are some of the major bottlenecks in animal production systems as a whole.