Emily Senerth

Ms. Emily Senerth

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 April 2023 in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RCRachel E. Christensen
Rachel E. Christensen
MYMichael D. Yi
Michael D. Yi
BKBianca Y. Kang
Bianca Y. Kang
SISarah A. Ibrahim
Sarah A. Ibrahim
NANoor Anvery
Noor Anvery
MAMurad Alam
Murad Alam

14 February 2020 in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMolly Szerlip
Molly Szerlip
DFDmitriy N. Feldman
Dmitriy N. Feldman
HAHerbert D. Aronow
Herbert D. Aronow
JBJames C Blankenship
James C Blankenship
JCJames W. Choi
James W. Choi
DCDavid Cox
David Cox
Evidence‐based recommendations for clinical practice are intended to help health care providers and patients make decisions, minimize inappropriate practice variation, promote effective resource use, improve clinical outcomes, and direct future research. The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) has been engaged in the creation and dissemination of clinical guidance documents since the 1990s. These documents are a cornerstone of the society's education, advocacy, and quality improvement initiatives. The publications committee is charged with oversight of SCAI's clinical documents program and has created this manual of standard operating procedures to ensure consistency, methodological rigor, and transparency in the development and endorsement of the society's documents. The manual is intended for use by the publications committee, document writing groups, external collaborators, SCAI representatives, peer reviewers, and anyone seeking information about the SCAI documents program.

ESEmily Senerth
Emily Senerth
TPTejanth Pasumarthi
Tejanth Pasumarthi
NTNeha Tangri
Neha Tangri
BABhavya Abbi
Bhavya Abbi
SBSkye Bickett
Skye Bickett
RMRebecca L. Morgan
Rebecca L. Morgan
This systematic review investigates the certainty of evidence (CoE) regarding noise annoyance as a determinant of biological changes known to contribute to disease development. We searched PubMed MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and CINAHL for English-language comparative studies conducted on humans of any age from 1 January 1940, to 28 August 2023. Further, studies that provided quantitative data on the relationship between noise annoyance and biomarkers of interest were included. Where possible, random-effects meta-analyses were used to calculate the odds ratios of noise annoyance on biomarkers and biological conditions considered to be risk factors for developing health effects. The risk of bias of individual studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias of Non-randomized Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E) instrument. The CoE for each outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The search identified 23 primary studies reporting on relevant biomarkers. Although some studies and pooled estimates suggest a possible association between noise annoyance and biological measures, the CoE overall is very low due to concerns with the risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision in the estimates of effects. In the context of environmental impact assessment, where guidelines aim to mitigate the prevalence of populations experiencing a high level of noise annoyance, our results suggest that such practices should be grounded in the understanding that annoyance is health-relevant because it reflects an undesirable reaction to noise, rather than a precursor to chronic physical health conditions.

31 December 2024 in Evidence-Based Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ESEmily Senerth
Emily Senerth
NTNeha Tangri
Neha Tangri
LKLori Krammer
Lori Krammer
VGVolf Gaby
Volf Gaby
PWPaul Whaley
Paul Whaley
RMRebecca L. Morgan
Rebecca L. Morgan

1 June 2026 in Annals of Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TPThomas Piggott
Thomas Piggott
PSPakeezah Saadat
Pakeezah Saadat
Alina HerrmannAlina Herrmann
Alina Herrmann
ASAirton Tetelbom Stein
Airton Tetelbom Stein
ADAndrea J. Darzi
Andrea J. Darzi
HSHolger Schünemann
Holger Schünemann
Transgression of planetary boundaries, such as biosphere integrity, climate change, and the introduction of new entities like microplastics, may have detrimental effects on human health. Health sys... Human health and natural systems are intrinsically linked—stable natural systems enable healthy human life. Health systems aim to promote, restore, and maintain health. Health systems may promote h...

15 April 2026 in Clinical and Public Health Guidelines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PSPakeezah Saadat
Pakeezah Saadat
Alina HerrmannAlina Herrmann
Alina Herrmann
BSBernardo Sousa-Pinto
Bernardo Sousa-Pinto
CMCharlotte T. J. Michels
Charlotte T. J. Michels
DTDenise Thomson
Denise Thomson
TPThomas Piggott
Thomas Piggott
Health systems contribute to environmental degradation while simultaneously being affected by its consequences. Yet, planetary health considerations are largely absent from health guidelines. On November 6–7, 2024, the Planetary Health Expert Workshop convened over 50 experts from the GRADE Planetary Health Project Group at Humanitas University, Italy, to explore methods for embedding planetary health into health guideline development. Through presentations, case studies, and group discussions, participants identified key methodological gaps and proposed processes and tools to advance the integration of planetary health in health guidelines. Case studies highlighted the need to balance clinical effectiveness with long‐term planetary impacts. This workshop demonstrates a strong interest in integrating planetary health considerations into health guidelines, ensuring evidence‐based health recommendations are not only effective for individuals but also reduce planetary boundary transgressions, restoring Earth's natural systems.